User talk:AbdullahKhaleeji7

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, AbdullahKhaleeji7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! nableezy - 04:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 04:39, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arab people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 04:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 05:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AbdullahKhaleeji7 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not vandalizing or trying to be disruptive in any way, I am simply trying to fix the page and they keep deleting my edits. I have a problem with the pictures they post because I seriously believe they do not represent the people discussed in the article.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not vandalizing or trying to be disruptive in any way, I am simply trying to fix the page and they keep deleting my edits. I have a problem with the pictures they post because I seriously believe they do not represent the people discussed in the article. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not vandalizing or trying to be disruptive in any way, I am simply trying to fix the page and they keep deleting my edits. I have a problem with the pictures they post because I seriously believe they do not represent the people discussed in the article. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not vandalizing or trying to be disruptive in any way, I am simply trying to fix the page and they keep deleting my edits. I have a problem with the pictures they post because I seriously believe they do not represent the people discussed in the article. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hello. Is Arab_people#See_also what you were trying to accomplish? I agree you were editing in good faith and not vandalizing, but I think people were objecting to your edits because they (usually) broke the lead section, and removed other images. Gimmetrow 05:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gimmetrow, that layout is exactly what I wanted but on the front page instead of the one they have. Can you show me how to do it? Or maybe we can reach a compromise somehow by keeping both boxes there somehow... Maybe one on top of the other?