Jump to content

User talk:Caspian blue/4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Caspian blue

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sennen goroshi (talk | contribs) at 04:57, 4 December 2008 (→ANI report: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If your comment here is once removed, please do not restore or revert this page.
Since this page is my talk page, I clean up any of irrelevant, inappropriate, unhelpful, or especially uncivil comments. Regards--Caspian blue (talk) 11:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
blue sea
File:Saphiri the cat by zenera-02.jpg

Meatpuppet?

Bouncehoper: What the crap is a meatpuppet?

Baegis: A marionette that subsists on a diet solely of meat and its derivatives.

Bouncehoper: ...How is that different than a sockpuppet? (also, makes me hungry....)

Baegis: Sockpuppets, of course, eat cotton products, which are severely lacking in nutrition and deliciousness.

Bouncehoper: How....strange....lol. thanks!

from Baegis's talk page

The 25 DYK Medal

The 25 DYK Medal
For your continuous WP:DYK contributions on various topics related to Korea, such as clothing, food, events, places, biographies, etc., I, RyanCross (talk · contribs), hereby award Caspian blue (talk · contribs) The 25 DYK Medal! Great work, and keep up your contributions to DYK! I bet you can get everything that is Korean on the Main Page, you just have to keep at it like you're doing now. Take care, and enjoy this medal from me. :-) – RyanCross (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Caspian. Perhaps you could expand Heo Nanseolheon I just started and make it no.26? The Bald One White cat 15:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Came across it on my travels, I also have proposed a {{Korea-writer-stub}} as amazingly it didn't exist yet, (I mean how many notable writers could we write about on wikipedia through the entirety of history the mind boggles). Its a shame we can't clone you hundreds of times given the content missing or that needs developing for korea!. Worse even is the coverage of Vietnam and Burma we have on here. I was watching By Any Means (which I am writing week by week on here) last night and he went though Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand which as you know is a part of the world that inspires me and it was just amazing. He rode in a rocket boat down the Mekong for some part which was probably one of the coolest modes of transport I;ve seen. Even the articles on the largest cities in Vietnam are barely beyond stubs. If only we could cover it all in detail like America and the UK and have rleiable and abundant sources to boot. I'm currently stubbing Japanese dams in the hope that they will be translated from Japanese wiki. Hope you are well friend The Bald One White cat 16:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. 95% of the articles we have related to Vietnam above a start class are Vietnam War and likely to be written from an American point of view, however neutral it strives to be. Thats why I use wikipedia to explore places and culture which I don't know about or will never get to see. Sure writing articles about films and local places and that which you are familiar with can be fun, but my overall goal and purpose on wikipedia is to branch out in the "grey areas" of the world from a "western" viewpoint. Given the extreme bias and the ignorance of many to "foreign" places, this is practically anything from Tijuana down to Tierra del Fuego, from Cairo to Walvis Bay, from Ankara eastwards to Tokyo etc. IN places the coverage seems unbelievably developed but browse through most of the categories on locations in Latin America, Africa and Asia and very few of articles on even major towns and cities are of a good standard, let alone 95% of the rest of the country which is "ignored" as of now. The strength of wikipedia really is from the people who live or are aquainted with cultures or places in "other" parts of the world and are able to develop it from their world viewpoint. Given time, I anticipate that people learning English in the developing world who increasingly have access to to computers and the web will begin to appear on increasingly on here. The unfortunate thing is that most people who visit wikipedia use us rather than nurture us, so the bulk of the work is done by a few thousand people. If we could maximise our potential, we'd see things start to change very fast and wikipedia would start growing at a rate which would seem more in keeping with its global reach The Bald One White cat 17:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hong Nan-pa

Updated DYK query On 6 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hong Nan-pa, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 22:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kkachi durumagi

Updated DYK query On 7 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kkachi durumagi, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Good work on 최진실. Her suicide was really shocking, wasn't it. --BorgQueen (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it still needs major revamping. The death was very tragic....--Caspian blue (talk) 18:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got a thank you card!

Chinese shoes

A complicated subject to be sure. This is what I can dig up without too much trouble:

  • 履 lǚ: cloth low-top shoes
  • 屐 bǐng: wood sole shoes, "clogs"
  • 靴 xuē: ankle to knee high boots
  • 屣 xǐ: crappy straw flip-flops
  • 屨 or 屦: straw or vine shoe-like sandals

jianlian (金蓮) is a euphemism for bound-feet the shoes for those feet are call 金蓮履 I'll do something with the hats when there is time. Sjschen (talk) 18:42, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks

Caspian blue, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C 02:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Empress Myeongseong

I don't really care about our issues on the article in question, I honestly believe that while we might each have different perspectives on the incident, that neither of us are trying to deceive anyone, we just want to emphasize different aspects of the article in different ways.

However, this new edit seems to be very different from anything I have read in the past - is it anywhere near the truth?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Empress_Myeongseong&diff=prev&oldid=243863203

Sennen goroshi (talk) 13:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your message. I deleted the articles you regarded my OR by Administrator. and I deleted the citation from Annals of Gojong, too. I didn't know UNESCO didn't designate it as the master piece unlike other annals. I'm sorry and thank you,Caspian blue.--Bukubku (talk) 03:28, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Choi Jin-sil

Updated DYK query On 9 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Choi Jin-sil, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 01:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Chinese New Year

Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at Chinese New Year. Thank you. VeryGoodBoy (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Big Thank You

Thank you very much for the barnstar - it's nice to be appreciated. I'll keep slugging away at that article. Waygugin (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hello

is operating two accounts called sockpuppeting? Btzkillerv (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have occasionally voted oppose, but I try not to vote too often (where I don't nominate) unless there's a point of order to bring up, e.g. where I feel policy is being misapplied, or in order to speed on things that seem fairly obviously to meet criteria, but which haven't made the quorum after 14 days. As a check, User:MZMcBride - wh I suppose would count as the deputy FSC director if we had proper titles - has agreed to make all judgements on whether things that I have been involved with get promoted or not.

More to the point - I think it's useful to keep standards a bit lower for the moment in order that we can achieve the critical mass that allows us to attract people who are able to raise standards higher. I've looked into the history of other featured content procedures, and it seems that standards will self-correct in time, but all successful Featured content projects had much lower standards at the start than they do now, and I suspect that holding featured sounds to similar levels before we get the talented people we need will only serve to keep featured sounds as a minority featured content process. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 14:06, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for the support in my recent RfA which just passed. Kindest, Lazulilasher (talk) 23:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Krugman image

My argument overall for images taken from the Princeton Communications Office (see also) is that on the office's site, under a section saying "Policies and restrictions", the only restriction relevant to these images is "Credit must be provided to..." I don't presume that there are double secret restrictions that aren't listed there. In contrast, it does include additional restrictions for certain classes of images: certain buildings and the University symbols. It also indicates a separate section of photos (not the one the Krugman photo et al come from) stated to be "for news media". It also goes on to say that there are other images available (i.e. not online) that do have additional/other restrictions on purpose of use and that do cost money.

I've emailed the PCO a couple of times for the brain-dead sure-fire absoposidefinite answer that a few people have been desirous of, and they have not given me one. - Keith D. Tyler 19:15, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of vandal warnings

Do not accuse editors of vandalism simply because you disagree with their edits. This was a totally unacceptable use of a warning template. Please attempt to resolve your differences with other editors in a more constructive manner in future. WJBscribe (talk) 23:08, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal section

Who vandalised this talk page shamelessly.

--Caspian blue (talk) 12:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quaternionenadler

Thank you for the message you left on my talk page. I would personally love to support the Quaternionenadler to become a FP. I first made the vector image as a 'key' to refer to the picture and the original, and I would hope eventually I could make an imagemap so if you clicked on the shield it would take you to the article for the state. As for the article, I would love to move it into the mainspace; however at the moment it is very Work In Progress, as all the shields need to be identified. If you could help, it would be much appreciated, however if not I would see if I could put a link on the nomination page, and then transfer it in a few days. Some more history of the eagle may be best, as currently the page seems only to glorify my image, but I shall begin researching that soon, I am a bit bogged down at the moment!--23230 talk 16:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Balloonman: Making it official

and others

  • Finally this one from Ballooman like below.

If you continue with your badgering, I will take this to ANI and ask that they block you. You've been advised by at least three 'crats, 3 admins, and 2 other editors that your behavior is verging on disruption and harassment. Please drop it, or I will take this to ANI.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 20:24, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[2][reply]

Hmm, badger, Bullying, WP:Harassment, and WP:Administrators would be good references. Enough is enough. I consider, Wisdom78's advice is worthy to listen to along with Rlevse. Please move on and don't ever come to me for this any more. --Caspian blue (talk) 21:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Sea of Japan naming dispute

Hello Caspian blue, could you please explain your revert here more clearly and deeply? Thank you. --Valentim (talk) 22:15, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is very simple. The two pictures represents both claims as evidence, and you deleted only one side.--Caspian blue (talk) 22:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank your for your response. --Valentim (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I'm sorry if I disappointed you. I simply do not understand your claim about the map. I took Kusunose was trying to be neutral by exclude the domestic map made by Korean. If the map should be included in the article, then a domestic map made by Japanese should be included too. I think what is rational is to add a map showing East Sea made by a non-Korean/non-Japanese person. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 05:35, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) I basically think the old domestic Korean/Japanese maps are not needed in the article. But if you do not agree. Then revert my edit when possible. You have a right to revert any other editor's edit as I have. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 06:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nihonjoe's abuse of the admin tools: False charge for "3RR on The Sea of Japan naming dispute"

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I don't exceed 3RR and rather have used discussion pages for my edits. I opened up discussion by myself twice. I only reverted twice for the article in question in 24 hours. However, Nihonjoe falsely accused me for violating 3RR but also blocked me for his mistake. When my edit was reverted, I used relevant talk pages and talked to the users in dispute, but why should I be blocked by the admin? Kusunose (talk · contribs) reverted 3 times in a row, but admin Nihonjoe who has charged for WP:WikiProject Japan and has some multiple issues with me in the past, only blocked for the false charge. My last revert was 6 hours ago, when my last edit (second revert in this 24 hours) was contested, I did not even try to revert the edit by Oda Mari (talk · contribs). I rather waited for her response for her revert. I think Nihonjoe has sought to block me at this time for his issue, so I request for unblock. I don't believe the admin is impartial for Japan-Korea disputes as well as toward me. The admin has falsely accused me of being a somebody's sock without any evidences, so I have protested him for it and everything of our dispute stems from his initial refusal to apologize his accusation made in public and continued insults against me. I have tried to have good faith toward him but he now blocked for the false charge. Please see the diffs and relevant pages provided below. Thank you.--Caspian blue 05:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)}}[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I have reviewed the edits more closely and determined that I was mistaken in seeing the same image being placed and removed four times. I apologize for misreading the edits. I have removed the block.

Request handled by: ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So where is a 3RR violation? The 3rd edit was not even a revert since there is no similar edit for it. Moreover, Nihonjoe falsely accuses my last edit occurred past in 1 day and one hour for my first edit as gaming the system. I don't edit Wikipedia 24 hours a day and examine the time. If the blocking admin wants to block me for edit warring and blatant disregard for consensus, there should be evidences provided by him. Kusunose (talk · contribs) is not blocked by Nihonjoe, so the rationale is not fit to the situation.--Caspian blue 06:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't flatter yourself, Caspian blue. I'm not out to get you. I came upon this article while investigating something different by another user. You reverted the removal/movement of the same content four times within slightly more than 24 hours (a little less than 26 hours to be exact). I think you're a fine editor, and you generally do a lot of good here. However, gaming the system by waiting slightly more than 24 hours to do the fourth edit is not acceptable. As you and Kusunose seem to have a disagreement over the inclusion of (or placement of) this information, you need to work out your differences on the talk page first and then make edits once you come to a consensus. Please note that Kusunose was warned for coming close to violating 3RR in the same article (he only made 3 edits), so I was fair in applying this policy. If this continues on this article, it will likely be protected to prevent anyone from edit warring. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not insult me as you have done a lot to me like these[3][4][5][6] I made 4 edits in total, and one edit is not even a revert. Moreover, my reverts only constitutes twice in 24 hours. Gaming the system? You falsely said that my last edit was past a day and one hour after my first edit. Your bad faith is toxic. I want you to at least take it to the ANI if you have some conscience. I've sought for consensus, and you blocked me for your issue.--Caspian blue 06:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've posted a note on ANI. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed the edits more closely ad determined that I was mistaken in seeing the same image being placed and removed four times. I apologize for misreading the edits. I have removed the block. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Quaternion Eagle from c. 1510
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Quaterionenadler David de Negker.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 08:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caspian. I don't have any experience with featured pictures but what do you think of this image? Its probably against criteria or a lousy photograph in the mind of photograph specialists but I thought it was an excellent image. Any thoughts?Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 20:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note, thats what I thought. It is scenery wise a superb picture but I didn't think it was sharp enough for FA. Just imagine how it would look if taken by a professional photographer with a high quality camera! Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 10:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Mofongo

Thank you. That's a good edit, and helpful. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 00:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, I'm also a member of WP:FOOD. Regards.--Caspian blue 00:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like the cat pics on your page. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:25, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you like the cat. She seems to have many fans at Flickrs.--Caspian blue 03:08, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hey CB. If you notice any other Korean editors with a poor knowledge of image copyright policies uploading a rash of likely copyright violations, please give me a heads-up. Thanks, Deiz talk 10:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I appreciate the reasons why they are uploading images, and I don't want to "hurt their feelings". However, copyright is serious, and ignorance of this is not a defence. Thanks for passing on coaching tips. Deiz talk 03:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, Byeonggwan (talk · contribs) has encountered further serious problems today and incurred a further block. Deiz talk 03:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
After re-reading your last post on my talk, I wonder what you mean by "I was afraid about the result"? A new editor who is uploading a number of probable or clear copyright violating images in a short time can be blocked for a short time - usually between 15 minutes and 3 hours depending on the circumstances - in order to get an initial message across and find out if the editor is communicative. This is nothing to be afraid of, and protects WP. An editor who is serious about learning proper editing protocols should not be put off by this. Deiz talk 06:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny sockpuppeter: Michael Friedrich and his offspring D10 Spada

According to Michael Friedrich (talk · contribs)'s own introduction, he is a young Japanese-Australian.[16] But he wrote somewhere he has lived in Japan more than 20 years. After pointed out on this along with his "intermediate" level of English, he said he just lived 5 years in Australia, but his heart is still there.(lol) He excused that his sockpuppet, Robert Houdini (talk · contribs) is his younger brother whose behaviors and agendas are identical to MF. After his graduation from University of Tokyo, the most prestigious university in Japan, he said the alleged brother went to U.S to study, but the last time stamp on August 31 does not make any sense. Robert Houdini claims he is a half Korean living in Japan. But Michael excused that he has Korean grandfather, so is automatically a descendant of Zainichi Korean based on Nagoya. But he had uploaded many bashing copyrighted images of 2002 Worldcup against Korea as well as his very negative edits on the subject. He said that's why he can read Korean language due to his home environment, and learned it to know more about Korean culture. However, he alleged that kimchi, Korean soul food was introduced to the West by Japanese first just like ramen.(lol) To sum up, he is a Korean-Japanese-Australian with poor Korean and English ability as well as with having a strong anti-Korean sentiment. Nevertheless, two checkusers confirmed the mentioned two are the same sock. Extremely rude D10 Spada (talk · contribs) (of course, sock of Michael) shouted that "I'm no interest in you", but his edit contracts his claim.(lol) It is so sad to see that possibly a elite young man of Japan blatantly disregard rules here and becomes a troll.-Caspian blue 11:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Japan-Korea articles

I strongly encourage all editors on Japan-Korea articles to discuss issues calmly on talk pages not edit war. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go to Mediation

I don't like worthless edition war. Administrators recommend us going to Wikipedia:Mediation. Many Administrators are watching us. We have to resolve this problem and recover the order. Let's go to Wikipedia:Mediation about Woo Jang-choon. I call for Sennen goroshi, too.--Bukubku (talk) 00:35, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, send me back your reply.--Bukubku (talk) 00:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yamashita's gold

Greetings...are you even reading the discussion on the talk page before making changes? The lawsuit is not being debated, but the huge amounts of false and dubious statements. As well as the fabricated statements. It would probably be more helpful for you to make your comments on the talk page than “drive-by” reverts. Jim (talk) 00:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. Your stated: "The article has caught my attention because you have been reported to ANI numerous times". If you take the time to read those reports, you would see they are from the same person (other than my recent 3R). They just happen to be an Admin who was resentful to me for removing his false and dubious statements from this same article. Jim (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the support. Jim is an internet bully. He is intellectually dishonest. I honestly believe that he knows that the material that I have provided is true, reliable and verifiable. I have been painstakingly explaining it to him since August. He has some undisclosed interest in the subject. I suspect a conflict of interest. Why else would someone be so fanatical about distorting the truth abut such an obscure subject? 98.151.55.160 (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You said: "Then, I would say I agree with the IP users (not one person as you allege) The IP Editor is using a dynamic IP and the address has changed three times over the past few months. You claim they are all three different users? Jim (talk) 02:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, if you cannot tell by the similarities in writting, claims and context presented they are the same user, then I will gracefully bid you a good day and go about my business. Jim (talk) 02:43, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Naksansa

Thank you so much for your kind comments about my Naksansa submission. I did spent quite a bit of time and effort on it, hoping to do well, given my experience. The fact that someone with your depth of knowledge, experience and accomplishments here takes the time to send me these favorable comments is greatly appreciated. I am also pleased to find that you feel this effort worthy of some recognition, although I am not familiar with this feature. I did read the WP:DYK entry (is this the "guide line" to which you refer?) but felt somewhat overwhelmed by all the rules and regulations therein. May I assume since you have nominated the Naksansa article that it meets these requirements? I understand that "Wikipedia:CITE#Inline_reference" needs to be embedded within the article but do not know where; beginning, end, or any place specefic. You will need to advise me please. With sincere appreciation Steve46814 (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanations on how to use the inline reference tags. I will do my best to properly incorporate these structures in my future endeavors. I have a question about one word you added into the Naksansa "Revision as of 20:15, October 30, 2008' [17] in the ==History== section; "Naksansa was founded in 671 CE, by the Buddhist monk, Uisang Daesa (Grand Mater Uisang) . . ." I suspect that "Grand Mater Uisang" should read "Grand Master Uisang". I can find references to "Grand Master" but none relating to Buddhism or the title/ranking of Buddhist hierarchy. The only references to "Mater" found are exclusive of the term "Grand". Thank you again for all your gracious assistance and instruction.Steve46814 (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread

Hello, Caspian blue. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding "anti-Japanese racial attacking". The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User: Caspian blue. Thank you. --Kralizec! (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Otello

Actually, I vaguely recall looking at an Otello recording the other day. Let me see if I can find it again.

Is there any rush on it? Just that I prefer to do them over two days. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, having checked, the short answer is "Which aria(s)?" - There's tons of stuff from it. I'm happy to do a lot of work on it - I was thinking Verdi, Wagner or Donizetti would be a good followup to the Puccini project - but if you want something quickly, it would herlp if you could make some suggestions.

Possibilities include:

  • any and all of these (we cannot use the restored mp3s from there, but most of those should clean up fine)


If you want to get that record and make a transfer of it, I will clean it up for you. I'm afraid it doesn't appear to be on the archives I've checked. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 02:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the poster's actually for the play, by the way, but, hey, we need some Verdi. How about this one [18] (I think I can clean it up decently). It's just piano and voice, but it's by the creator of the role. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This recording is incredible. Wait until you hear the cleaned version! Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Niun mi tema
Francesco Tamagno, the original Otello, sings "Niun mi tema" (Morte d'Otello) from Giuseppe Verdi's Otello. This 1903 recording dates from just two years before Tamagno's death.
Problems playing this file? See media help.

Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


And now I'm having second thoughts. Is that an improvement on:

or am I just adding more flaws? This one doesn't edit very well. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Korean

--Seoul 04:19, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Naksansa

Updated DYK query On 1 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Naksansa, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


About "North Korea"

Hello! I’m from Mainland China. And I want to talk about the article “North Korea” with you.

If the relational things in my memory are not error, the Wikipedia has a rule, such as if a word is translated from X language, it should be written with its original word in X language, such as the word “China” in English Wikipedia should be written with “中國”, because “China” is translated from “中國” in Chinese Language.

As everyone knows, the English word “North Korea” is translated from the Korean word “북한”. So it should be written with its Korean original word based on the relational rule in Wikipedia.

You could leave words in there if you want to write back.

————自由华夏 (talk) 01:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked all three of you for edit-warring on Comfort women. I know you've had a lot of trouble with stalkers and abusive socks on that article, but in this case you do seem to be also quite stubbornly edit-warring, I hope you'll find ways of dealing with the dispute differently. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Caspian blue (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So there is no 3RR on the article nor even 2RR, but WP:V, WP:CONSENSUS are requested core principals to maintain the highly sensitive article. I have tried to keep the principles but the two users have constantly blanked out massive information cited by reliable sources and altered contents with deceptive edit summaries (POV, unreliable sources, unrelated, etc). A discussion with one person who returns from his long-term break had no fruitful result (his rationale is "I only reverted to Sennen goroshi's version" etc). The other, Sennen goroshi has kept blanking the article to near vandalism because I edit the article per his usual habit of "follwing me". Therefore, I contest this block. Uninvolved admin's review would be appreciated. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests limited to complaints against others are inadequate; see WP:GAB. You must address the block reason and your conduct. —  Sandstein  21:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
• If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy •
·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 21:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-11-06 Woo Jang-choon Here's hoping it helps your dispute. Best wishes, DurovaCharge! 01:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Magoja

Hello! I have reviewed your submission of Magoja at the Did You Know nominations page. I noticed some issues that need to be clarified, and have left comments for you underneath your nomination's entry. Please respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer talk/contribs 16:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded an image of an old gentleman I spotted in Seoul wearing traditional Korean dress. This appears to be a vest rather than the Magoja in your article. I see what looks like five jade buttons so I'm sure this is not a Magoja. I did not assign a Category as I don't know how to define this type of dress or if it would have any value to you in any of your articles. Anyway, here it is; Image:Korea-Seoul 0589-06 traditional dress.JPG for your consideration.Steve46814 (talk) 06:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

care to join in?

might be nice if we both contributed here, it is certainly better resolved on a talk page, than with another 48 hour block

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Comfort_women#Proposed_changes

Sennen goroshi (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Later, I gotta do something right now in my real life.--Caspian blue 16:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dream Cinema

I'm currently writing an article for Dream Cinema, a movie theatre in Seoul. My sources say that it was due to be torn down this year, but I can't find anything (in English) that says if this actually happened or not. As I am unable to read Korean, is there any chance you could take a quick look for any Korean-language sources? Thanks in advance. PC78 (talk) 18:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! PC78 (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have now created the article (Dream Cinema) using one of the sources you gave me. If you have a moment, could you please check ref #3 and make sure I have understood the source correctly? PC78 (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for magoja

Updated DYK query On 8 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article magoja, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Victuallers (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello, Caspian blue. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Tan | 39 05:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab

Hi. A MedCab case has been opened here, regarding Woo Jang-choon. You have been named as a participant. Please visit the case page and indicate whether or not you will participate. Thank you. [roux » x] 23:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I redacted your comment because large parts of it were incivil and assumed bad faith, which doesn't help mediation. I have asked Durova to come and clarify what is going on. Can you trust me to help make sure that both of you get a chance to speak, and help you both come to an understanding? [roux » x] 20:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most MedCab cases are handled by non-admins, actually. I understand that you're not calm right now--but don't you see that you accusing him of being a liar is just as bad as him calling you a liar? It doesn't matter if you're right, it matters that saying it doesn't help. Please trust me, okay? We will get to the truth, and we will settle whatever problems you two are having with each other. I just need you to be polite while we do it, even if you are right, okay? [roux » x] 21:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You can ask the question. It is the way you asked the question that is the problem. Please remove all the personal attacks, and please direct the question at me. You can, for example, ask: "I don't understand what the dispute is. Can Bukubku please explain?" [roux » x] 21:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:You've got

Thanks Caspian-- I suppose I'm just recognizing my actual "semi-" status, since I'm still poking around here now & then. I've just added a little on Song Il-gon's latest, and noticed that we don't seem to have an article on the actor Moon Seong-geun... I noticed that the film article, Virgin Stripped Bare by Her Bachelors, spells his name as Mun Seong-kun, Green Fish spells it Moon Sung-keun... so maybe we have an article started on him somewhere, but under a different spelling? Not sure which one to use... Anyway, this news article might help with such an article-- it says he was Vice-chairman of the Korean Film Council in 1999. Dekkappai (talk) 20:15, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Caspian. You mean Reverend Moon Sun-myung? Yes, he and his "Moonies" are very well-known in the U.S. Or do you mean Moon Ik-hwan? His name rings a bell... I've heard it somewhere... but no, definitely not before I lived in Korea. Dekkappai (talk) 00:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gibang?

Quick question: with regard to Disturbance in Her Barroom, I am wondering if gibang is the same as gyobang? PC78 (talk) 02:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks! PC78 (talk) 02:54, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI#User:Bukubku's harassment

Barnstar

Many thanks, the barnstar is much appreciated! :) PC78 (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback

Thanks for your input at my successful Rfa. I'm already thinking about working on my content creation. Hopefully in a few months, I'll have passed the point where you would've !voted Support. If you have any more equally well-thought-out suggestions on how I can improve myself as an editor, I'd be happy to hear them. I wanted to ask you what you normally look for when you are evaluating an Rfa candidate's prior Afd contributions. I can see why you would look askance at the Arthur M. Dula nom (I wouldn't do one like that again), but I'm curious as to why you think my nom of Unspeakable Vault (of Doom) was so improper. Thanks again for your input!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 20:45, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Irworobongdo

Thanks for you kind invitation to join your group - I am afraid I won't be much use though - and I only occasionally look in and don't know many Korean things. I do think this has a nice potential for a good article. The picture and little and the extra additions you made make the article look much better. Many thanks (Msrasnw (talk) 23:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I think there is quite a lot more in Ms Chapman's article we could use - and there could be quite a lot of nice links coming out of it I think. The picture is very nice but I think a better one showing the whole of the image might be nice. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 23:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Hi - I think the little entry is looking much nicer and I like the addition of some divisions. Do you think some headings like i) description of the image ii) symbolic singificance iii) History - might be better? Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 22:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Caspian Blue - I have added more refs inline as per your suggestion. It looks a bit "over-referenced" to me now but I guess that is want is wanted. Overall it looks a nice article - not as nice as my Youn Shim-deok one though. I can't find anymore information to add. PS: I know they don't belong to me - but it is nice to start article isn't it. PPS: my next Korean one might be to do with a "minor" building. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Caspian Blue, thank you very much - I just saw this article on the frontpage! It made me smile . I don't know why. Well done and best wishes :) (Msrasnw (talk) 14:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Yonsei

I tagged Yonsei with {{db-movedab}}, following the instruction given in Wikipedia:Malplaced disambiguation pages (WP:MDL), so an admin may move Yonsei (disambiguation) to Yonsei. The speedy request includes a message "The page to be moved to this name is Yonsei (disambiguation)." followed by a link through which an admin can perform the desired page move. It is in the form of deletion template because a page have to be deleted in the process. Hope this clarifies my action. --Kusunose 15:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK submission of Irworobongdo

Hello! Your submission of Irworobongdo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer talk/contribs 02:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for those links. Could you add them as much as possible to the article before I verify the hook? The second link (Sun, moon, and five peaks) is still not used in the article at all, and the first (The national palace museum of Korea) only once. There are still several paragraphs in the article with no inline citations at all, so you can go through them and cite one or both of those sources for every single fact presented.
Also, could you add a section (before Features and interpretationn explaining what the Irworobongdo is actually used for? I presume it's used in theater or as just a piece of decoration or something, but the article isn't clear about that. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the update. I'm on my way out the door now so I won't be able to look more closely until later in the evening, but from my first glance, I still don't see a paragraph or so describing what the Irworobongdo was used for? —Politizer talk/contribs 00:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am not meaning to be overly critical to keep your article from making DYK; I only try to make sure that articles are high-quality when they reach the main page—specifically, I try to make sure that the article that reaches the main page won't leave the reader feeling as if something were missing. You can call it "perfectionist" if you like, but notice I haven't been rejecting hooks because they're not perfect; I've just been trying to hurry to improve them while there's still time. —Politizer talk/contribs 15:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

We don't often agree, but thanks for the help with the Palmer problem. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 04:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you had the unfortunate experience wit the SPA who does not want anything beyond his boundary. I think s/he would eventually get some reward for his behavior. Take care.--Caspian blue 04:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Rfa

Caspian blue, thank you very much for participating in my Rfa, which was successful with 80 Support, 5 Oppose, 6 Neutral. The comments were overwhelming, and hopefully I can live up to the expectation of the community.

I would also like to thank my nominator Realist2 and my co-nom Orane (talk), and special mention to Acalamari and Lenticel (talk) for the kindness from the start. Regards, Efe

--Efe (talk) 04:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Korean Cusine & Shennen

Don't let him goad you into an edit war. He is wrong and will receive appropriate punishment as a result because consensus is against him. If he violates 3r again, please let me revert it and ask Chris to file a complaint on the proper Administrator board; because he is involved in this he cannot act in an Administrative manner due to conflict of interest.

--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 19:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jeremy, long time no see. Well, something already seems to happen....--Caspian blue 02:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed Caspian, the wheels of wikipedia are turning on a 24 hour basis. Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new idea

Hey Caspian, would you like to join me on improving this article - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_breakfast ?

There are no controversies regarding it, and it seems to be in need of a little improvement at the moment.

It would be nice to work with you on something not related to Japan, Korea, WW2 or anything else that is likely to cause problems.

Sennen goroshi (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Woo Jang-choon

Hi Caspian, sorry for the slow response; I'm afraid I'm not able to help with this now. I can manage a little bit of copy-editing, but that's about it these days. I hope you can find someone else to check the sources. --Amble (talk) 07:17, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just asked you a favor, so sorry for the trouble.--Caspian blue 15:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Irworobongdo

Updated DYK query On 23 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irworobongdo, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--PFHLai (talk) 18:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna sango15

The Barnstar | My RFA | Design by L'Aquatique


The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,

all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.
—Mizu onna sango15Hello!


Expansion

Hi amigo. Just to let you know Template:Expand Korean has been created. Please add it at the top of articles which have any decent content on Korean wikipedia which needs transwikiying. It is part of a new drive to get missing articles on others wikipedias into english. Thanks Count Blofeld 21:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your oppose at my RfA

Thanks for your candor. I agree, as I have said elsewhere, that the Frank Kaufmann AfD was the worst I've ever behaved on Wikipedia. That behavior didn't come out of nowhere, however, but only after a the issues with Andrew Wilson (academic) and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_Wilson_(theologian). Others have had negative interactions with Hrafn, including an ANI thread which did not involve me at all. My objective at the Kaufmann RfA was to bring out Hrafn's contentious and less than civil nature, without myself violating any guidelines or policies. I essentially set out to "draw a foul" from him that would undermine his credibility; for good or ill, I accomplished that goal in that AfD. When User:S. Dean Jameson told me I was over the line, I left the AfD, and didn't interact with Hrafn thereafter. This incident happened three and a half months and 5,000+ edits ago, and I'd point to my interactions with User:Tautologist as an example that I've improved in my knowledge of how to handle contentious editors since as a result of those interactions with Hrafn. Jclemens (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Guangzhou dialect

Did you want to vote in the poll at the bottom of the page on moving back to Standard Cantonese? kwami (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think the "Standard Cantonese" is a neologism, but the problem is that there is no suitable naming for the page yet.--Caspian blue 00:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

The RfA Barnstar
Caspian blue, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

UAA report

Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. However, your report has been removed due to the username not violating policy, or not being blatant enough for a block. Please remember you should only post infringements on this page if they are so serious that the user needs to be blocked immediately. Others should be discussed with the user in question first, for example using the {{Uw-username}} template. A request for comment can be filed if the user disagrees that their name is against the username policy, or has continued to edit after you have expressed your concern. Thank you. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 09:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jclemens RfA

Jclemens' RfA Thankspam
JClemens' RfA Thanks
Thank you for participating in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 77 supporting and 2 opposing. Regardless of your position, I thank you for the time you took to examine my record and formulate your response. Jclemens (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metaguide

What's this about? Who are you supposed to be biased against? Yours just looks like a list of all the other guides to me. I think it's extremely useful.

Incidentally, I read JayHenry's guide differently than your guide. I think his "unsure" and "unknown" headings are undecided or neutral rather than oppose, but you could ask him to be certain. Cool Hand Luke 19:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The candidates in the first half of the table only seem to get negative comments under "what people say", those further down seem to get both negative and positive comments. Not sure why that is. I don't know if this is what that other guide means but that does seem to come across particularly harshly on Carcharoth - most of the guides that give an opinion seem to be support, but the summary of comments sounds like a litany of damnation. 217.28.13.175 (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the section is being implemented after Lar helped me to increase more space in the table. I have no interaction with Carcharoth and even had never heard of the name until pretty recently. He surely has many supportive comments. Due to once limited space, I only summarized negative comments first. Of course, all candidates have good values (that's why they are the candidates)--Caspian blue 20:57, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't mean to sound hyper-critical, I was just speculating on what that other 'guide guide' might have meant. I think your table is an interesting approach and must have been a fair amount of work. I have pointed out a couple of seeming inaccuracies on your guide's talk pager too though, probably arising from Lar changing his mind. 217.28.13.175 (talk) 21:21, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

If I remember correctly, you have asked me for help on several occasions when you were attacked by sock puppets. How is the situation now? Jehochman Talk 07:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the caring, but I have to be off from Wikipedia now.--Caspian blue 07:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Greetings from WikiProject Korea!

Hello Caspian blue, thank you for the message and it's done: I am just reading that book - let's see more in the future. See you,----Erkan Yilmaz 19:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom vote

Hi there! I noticed you opposed me, and I was wondering what concerns you had about my candidacy and if I might be able to clarify anything? Thanks! --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 01:50, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak in what way? Are there any you would like me to elaborate on or explain further? --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 01:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, thanks anyways! :) --Hemlock Martinis (talk) 02:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yonsei Severance Hospital.

Hi. Hate to drag this on but this question have drowned in the debate of whether or not Yonsei Severance Hospital should be a redirect. Is Yonsei Hospital ever referred to by just Yonsei?

See Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Lists and Wikipedia:MOSDAB#Examples_of_individual_entries_that_should_not_be_created for why this is an issue. Taemyr (talk) 04:10, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Later, I want to take a break from the person whom I consider the worst person even over many harassing sockpuppeters I've encountered in Wikipedia. --Caspian blue 04:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Hiya, regarding your queries on the ArbCom voting pages, it's probably better if you post your queries (and any replies) on the talkpage of the vote. It's not like RfAs where people engage in major discussions right on the voting page itself. If you move your comment though, I'll be happy to reply to it there, or we can talk about it here on your talkpage (or mine), whichever you prefer.  :) --Elonka 05:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the visit and note on a difference between RFA and ArbCom election, but I won't remove my comment there because I think I raise legitimate points. As you see, I don't cast my vote for his candidacy yet, but I found ironies from Durova and your statements which I believe, strongly affect to voters' mind. Honestly, the allegation on a series of harassment is totally uncalled (if so, he would been desysopped already with RFAC cases). I just want to know about IRC admin-shoppoing allegation. Several diffs would suffice. Sorry for brushing up the recall, but as you know I also did not even put my name there. I'm ambivalent about the friction between you and him and his election campain. I don't care any place for the answer. --Caspian blue 06:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I already answered this a bit on my talkpage. See if that helps answer your questions? If not, you can ask there for more info. --Elonka 06:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, "the only thing" about which I want to know from your statement is the IRC allegation. You may have forgotten that I collected every comments from the editors who have their own guides. I of course, read through the Sarah's blame, and COI issues (which I already spotted on ANI at that time), but well I disagree with your assessment on the "two issues". I can't find the IRC thing yet from the user guide (including Jechochman's rebuttal at its talk page) and your page.--Caspian blue 06:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Further information is available at User talk:Elonka/ACE2008. --Elonka 16:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No, you still fail to answer my question and there is no such evidence on the IRC thing.--Caspian blue 17:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What kind of evidence are you looking for? I am not aware of any mechanism to provide diffs for comments made in IRC. --Elonka 18:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not asking you to provide "IRC logs" for your allegation, but there should be at least one pertinent diff either from any noticeboard or from user page.--Caspian blue 18:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What kind of diff are you looking for? --Elonka 19:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-_-;; Diff(s) can prove your allegation on his IRC forum shopping; a third party's claim or witness on Jehochman's conduct via IRC.--Caspian blue 19:09, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, per Jehochman's request I've asked for a neutral clerk to move our threaded discussion to talk. Would be glad to continue dialog with you there. In a nutshell, by the time I weighed in on that recall drive Elonka's standard for recall had already been exceeded. I had stood by my recall pledge and resigned. Having a meaningful recall system is more important IMO than whether either she or I kept the tools. Best regards, DurovaCharge! 16:42, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, it is the candidate's request.--Caspian blue 17:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Caspian blue. You have new messages at KieferFL's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

vote discussion

 Done--Tznkai (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Wrong warning and huggle

Are you referring to the edit I made to Koreans? I don't quite understand. ?:-/ Lazylaces (Talk to me 02:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember admitting to anything. Lazylaces (Talk to me 02:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ANI report

Caspian, I am considering making an ANI report against you for disrupting wikipedia that will request you are indef blocked from editing.

I don't mind if you have content disputes with other editors, that is how wikipedia gains neutrality - however you seem to be constantly wasting everyone's time with useless reports and long drawn out dramas about minor points. If you wish to waste your time that is not my concern, I am concerned about the other editors/admins who are forced to deal with these pointless issues.

Please try to calm down a little and concentrate on your edits, rather than treating wikipedia as your own personal battleground.

thanks

Sennen goroshi (talk) 04:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Caspian_blue/4&oldid=255785920"