User talk:Waterwater212

Dear Gregs

You were banned from wikipedia yesterday for sockpuppetry confirmed via checkuser. As a banned user you are not entitled to edit wikipedia which means coming back with a new account and continuing to battle over your article like you have done here whether you are right are wrong, because of your use of sockpuppetry you clearly lost any right to edit wikipedia and you do not seem to understand WP:BAN and WP:SOCK, another checkuser will be underaway tonight and you will find yourself blocked again...81.129.31.26 (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

???????????????????????????--Waterwater212 (talk) 20:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

don't lie, this is obvious gregs

1) You're only edits are to win the geordie dispute, as what gregs did.

2) Your talkpage arguments are exactly the same as him, in the same manner and style.

3) CU evidence can support this. It is clearly you, good day. 81.129.31.26 (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new and unique editor

"wouldn't go into battling a dispute straight away"

"wouldn't know what a wikipedia citation is"

"wouldn't know what a wikipedia dispute is"

"Would not attempt to win a dispute using the argument and post in the same manner as a banned user straight away"

it is obvious. 81.129.31.26 (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You must be the annoying dynamic IP that has been banned on the history page who is removing the citations???--Waterwater212 (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]