User talk:EverybodyHatesChris

Welcome!

Hello, EverybodyHatesChris, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Isotope23 ^talk 17:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 20:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

EverybodyHatesChris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't think I really NEED to come back to wikipedia because I have made all the edits I felt needed to be made, and was merely going around trying to help out on other television articles because I was bored. However, I would like to note that the indefinite block given here was pretty outrageous by Jpgordon. Number one, It came without a warning. Number two, none of my edits have been unconstructive. Number three, his reason for blocking me wasn't clear, but before he did, he accused me of sockpuppetting here which isn't true [1]. In fact, someone told him that the sockpuppets weren't even abusive like he CLAIMED they were (which is one blatant mistake) and that he shouldn't even have made such a remark. Anyway, as I said, I have made many of the contributions I've wanted to make here anyway but I do not deserve to be blocked. :)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't think I really NEED to come back to wikipedia because  I have made all the edits I felt needed to be made, and was merely going around trying to help out on other television articles because I was bored. However, I would like to note that the indefinite block given here was pretty outrageous by Jpgordon. Number one, It came without a warning. Number two, none of my edits have been unconstructive. Number three, his reason for blocking me wasn't clear, but before he did, he accused me of sockpuppetting here which isn't true [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong]. In fact, someone told him that the sockpuppets weren't even abusive like he CLAIMED they were (which is one blatant mistake) and that he shouldn't even have made such a remark. Anyway, as I said, I have made many of the contributions I've wanted to make here anyway but I do not deserve to be blocked. :) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't think I really NEED to come back to wikipedia because  I have made all the edits I felt needed to be made, and was merely going around trying to help out on other television articles because I was bored. However, I would like to note that the indefinite block given here was pretty outrageous by Jpgordon. Number one, It came without a warning. Number two, none of my edits have been unconstructive. Number three, his reason for blocking me wasn't clear, but before he did, he accused me of sockpuppetting here which isn't true [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong]. In fact, someone told him that the sockpuppets weren't even abusive like he CLAIMED they were (which is one blatant mistake) and that he shouldn't even have made such a remark. Anyway, as I said, I have made many of the contributions I've wanted to make here anyway but I do not deserve to be blocked. :) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't think I really NEED to come back to wikipedia because  I have made all the edits I felt needed to be made, and was merely going around trying to help out on other television articles because I was bored. However, I would like to note that the indefinite block given here was pretty outrageous by Jpgordon. Number one, It came without a warning. Number two, none of my edits have been unconstructive. Number three, his reason for blocking me wasn't clear, but before he did, he accused me of sockpuppetting here which isn't true [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ryulong]. In fact, someone told him that the sockpuppets weren't even abusive like he CLAIMED they were (which is one blatant mistake) and that he shouldn't even have made such a remark. Anyway, as I said, I have made many of the contributions I've wanted to make here anyway but I do not deserve to be blocked. :) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}