User talk:Fylindfotberserk

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 10 sections are present.

Royal Challengers Bangalore

@Fylindfotberserk,

Thanks for the information. The Bangalore wiki page mentions about the Bengaluru and only the matter of time all the Bangalore will be edited as Bengaluru in the Wiki Pages considering the amount of articles and it will take time to rewrite all the articles.

Happy Holidays

DoebLoggs (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year and thanks for your good wishes

Vambu Sandai - Discussion

Please take part in the discussion. Lakshmi Putrudu, the dubbed version of this film, should not have a wiki page. The discussion is located on the page titled Vambu Sandai. Thank you. --DragoMynaa

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

A Joyous Yuletide to You!

JACKINTHEBOX • ^TALK is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year 2021!

Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Happy New Year, Fylindfotberserk

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Fylindfotberserk! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:51, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

A cookie - Talk:Amitabh Bachchan:

I was about to ‘notdone’ the guy’s semi request under it being gibberish / possible vandalism (Give it ‘possible’ for AGF and BITE’s sake). Thanks for saving me the trouble.

MM (Give me info.) ^(Victories) 11:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Matticusmadness: Most welcome. And thanks for the cookie, I'm literally having some right now

. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date style changes

Hi@Fylindfotberserk, Thanks for regularly update date style fixes on Andhra Pradesh. I use source editor and even though I select from the displayed calendar, the resulting date is always in YYYY-MM-DD order. If I try to use Indian date order, it results in blank. Is there a way to properly get the date in Indian date format? Arjunaraoc (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjunaraoc: Well thanks for asking, I use RefToolbar, which when enabled in our "Preferences" setting, adds a "cite" button to the editing toolbar. So when you use source editing, you can select one of the four common cite options - web, news, book and journal. After you select one, a form appears. You have to put the reference link in the URL dialogue box and click on 'Autofill' button (magnifying glass symbol). It will automatically populate the most of the fields, and would take the default dateformat from your computer for the 'date' dialogue box. You can fill the 'access-date' by clicking on the 'Insert current date' button. Some fields may be left blank or incorrectly filled, for which you have to check it.

For correcting the dateformat already present reference, I use a script. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Hello there! I just want to say thank you about your report on YilevBot's a few hundredth sockpuppet account, your analysis is awesome, even I can't spot it on idwiki (because they avoid it it seems). So here's some delicious JPG'ed chocolate for you.

/ɲə/-lvoskt (bicara) 10:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Nyilvoskt, much needed. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:21, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, nice to meet you also.

/ɲə/-lvoskt (bicara) 12:37, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ranbir Kapoor filmography

Hey, could you take a look at this threat? Thanks. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this user keeps adding information from Sacnik. Please take a look? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to stop infobox edit-warring at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus

I have made a subtle change to the infobox at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus and explained the reasons for it at Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus#The name in the infobox. When considering the edit, please remember that:

If the name field is not used in the infobox template, the article name is displayed just as if it appeared in the infobox template's name field.
The native name field is displayed immediately below the article name in the infobox.

With no name field to change, and the disruptive editor's preferred name appearing high in the infobox, it is possible that the disruptive editor will go away.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toddy1: That's a very good idea actually. Hope that they do not get too creative with the name parameter. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi. Any sources for this statement of yours: Infobox name and article title should match? Keivan.f^Talk 20:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f: Article title / WP:COMMONNAME. It is mentioned in the Template:Infobox person documentation for the said parameter - "Common name of person". Besides, this is how most articles are. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:22, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of the articles though. Priyanka Chopra pops to mind, which to me implies that this is not a policy but rather a guideline that may or may not be followed. Regardless, I won't be challenging your edit. Just wanted to know your rationale. Keivan.f^Talk 20:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keivan.f: I'm not aware of that particular article's history. If it is a recent change, it can be reverte4, or if longstanding then can be discussed in its t/p. The default is the common name. It iterates to the article name if the parameter is left blank even. I don't see a reason why we should not highlight the WP:COMMONNAMEs / article names. The other less known names have specific parameters ('birth_name', 'nickname' and 'other_names') for the pupose. And if necessary, we can have a move request / RfC. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also infobox is the first thing a WP:READER comes across in the mobile version of a Wiki article, hence more logical for the common name to be highlighted. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your email

Thanks for the email, I wasn't aware of the background. I gave the lack of sources as the reason for my revert, but can see that there may be good reasons to exclude the content even if they attempt to source it. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: Most welcome welcome

. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asur (film)

I think my edit [1] I was looking at an old version and totally missed you had reverted it already. Completely my mistake! I've reported them to AIV (and they've been blocked for 24 hours) for the continued unsourced edits, but from the history on Shedin Dekha Hoyechilo, I think they're a sock of Halud Foressa. Ravensfire (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: I was able to guess that

. I only reverted the long-plot and castlist stuff. If necessary, we can restore this version by "GreenC bot". And thanks for the notification, I've watchlisted SPI case page and some of the articles they trawl. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		Copy Editor's Barnstar
		I award you this Copy Editor's Barnstar for insisting on clear, comprehensible, and grammatically correct articles. This for your tireless copyedits. Pachu Kannan (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pachu Kannan: Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

I am having a confusion regarding the Nationality and Citizenship column in Infobox for Indian politicians, should we use these 2 or any one in the BLPs of Indian politicians which are not much popular or are elect for the first time and are not special case regarding their Nationality or Citizenship. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: According to WP:INFOBOXNTLY, both 'nationality' and 'citizen' parameters are not needed if the 'birth_place' is mentioned. However, if 'birth_place' is empty, 'nationality' is enough. 'Citizen' is only important for non-resident Indians. But for politicians in India, they have be an Indian citizen to run for elections. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your guidance TheSlumPanda (talk) 16:07, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Most welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bagpat district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ajay Kumar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock edit

@Fylindfotberserk: please check the user user:(कड़वी मुस्कान), it seems to be the sock of user:I Kadékk Gilang, the account seems to be in interested in the same page Karbi people and have a very similar editing pattern. Thank you! Alaya12345 (talk) 13:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hahaha nice try proof? you loser!

this person is dangerous and spreading false information (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your anti-Hindu statements are not accepted here (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alya, thank you for admitting that you are wordain 🙏🏼🥳 (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 14:47, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now this editor is indulging in personal attacks WP:CIVIL Alaya12345 (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets (Wordain)

Hello please check this user Alya12345 I suspect he is a sockpupet returning from the former account wordain what they have in common is that they are both interested in the tribes of northeastern India and the northeastern states. The latest edit is in the state of Nagaland who again added the map File:Mong_Mao-the_detail_map.svg to the history article (कड़वी मुस्कान) (talk) 13:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

@HistoryofIran, Austronesier, and Gotitbro: Do you guys know who is this. A Gurjar POV pusher for sure, like PakistaniHistorian, but this guy also uses an Indian IP [2]. Definitely a sock. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gotitbro: See this, same Uttakhand relaed POV like this. Also note this revert of your edit. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror. I have filed an SPI here (another one his recent sock networks), comments are welcome.

IPs from this network have ravaged simple and enwiki. If Category:Gurjar clans of India is extensively filled you know the networks active. Gotitbro (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socky edits from IPs outside India (like this) [Pakistan here] perhaps point towards meatpuppetry. Gotitbro (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, don't have a clue right now. If I find anything, I'll let you know. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Creation

Hello @Fylindfotberserk sir, today i checked something randomly that on wikipedia there are accounts of celebrities who are popular only due to reels or TikTok videos. But when i checked scientist names on Wikipedia then i found that are are many highly cited scientists which do not have wikipedia page. For eg. Dipanwita Dutta, she is the most cited author in India as per AD Scientific Index and have more than 2.8 lakh citations. and not only she there are many scientists like this. I want to ask you that should i create wikipedia article on such great scientists. Thanks TheSlumPanda (talk) 06:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Sadly yes. And I'm sure majority were just created by fans, instead of getting drafted first. The latter process would've got majority of them stalled or deleted. You can create them scientist articles based on WP:NPROF. I've created quite a few politician articles based on WP:NPOL, only one got deleted, that too because of vague reasons, like him being a mayor. Ironically, another mayor's article was 'kept' who had less coverage than my one. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance sir , surely i will create articles on such scientists.. TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Most welcome, and happy editing

. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:14, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i have created an article on Dipanwita Dutta, can you suggest me some improvements? TheSlumPanda (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Nice work. Please add a few more WP:Independent sources. That would be good to go as of now IMO. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will cite some more independent sources as soon i will find. TheSlumPanda (talk) 20:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Fylindfotberserk. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. W170924 (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W170924: I've replied. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vansh Sayani

FYI - nominated Vansh Sayani for deletion with the intent of this being a redirect after a bit of an edit-war back and forth. Notifying you as a recent contributor to the article. Ravensfire (talk) 13:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ravensfire: Thanks. Someone linked it in one of my watch-listed pages, so did a little bit of basic maintenance work. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Figured it was something like that. Just hit everyone who's touched the most recent version so there's no canvassing concerns. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 15:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

The IP that is edit warring over at Maratha page likely belongs to this sockmaster , here is their range [3]. Ratnahastin (talk) 16:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch Ratnahastin. I forgot the name, encountered once or twice at 'Gadaria people'. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent changes on T. Raja Singh

diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T._Raja_Singh&curid=43489794&diff=1248954677&oldid=1248921353

You changed all dates to the format DD January, YYYY from YYYY-MM-DD stating MOS:NUM. However, even when it is YYYY-MM-DD, it is rendered and displayed as the format specified there. The intention of making it YYYY-MM-DD is to make it standardized, allowing computers to parse it such as the IA bot which archives links (and also puts the archive date in the format YYYY-MM-DD).

I don't see the point of your change since the end output is the same.

Just wanted to discuss before reverting such a change. Skratata69 (talk) 12:39, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As clearly mentioned on MOS:NUM, it is acceptable to use YYYY-MM-DD for references, which is what I did Skratata69 (talk) 12:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skratata69: Why would you want to revert it when DMY and MDY are standard date formats in most of Wikipedia articles instead of YYYY-MM-DD. The purpose of the script is to maintain the format type of articles pertaining to the country it is related to. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

because of ambiguities in DMY and MDY. YYYY-MM-DD is the ISO format, as well as an accepted format on wiki.

All of this is irrelevant because the end output is still the same. It was displayed as 1 January, 2024 before and after your change so I am asking what was the point of you changing it from simple number format that is better understood by scripts and bots to this. Skratata69 (talk) 12:49, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skratata69: Read at the examples MOS:DATETIES MOS:DATEUNIFY as well as MOS:DATERET. You can't all of a sudden unilaterally change the longstanding formatting style of an article. If you want changes made, you propose it somewhere where YMD is accepted at a global level and thus affects all the articles of Wikipedia. As I said, the formatting is mostly in DMY or MDY format in edit mode in most of the articles. This is an unnecessary discussion. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need protection

Hey Fylindfotberserk, some users are vandalizing Maithili language, Mithila (region), and many more articles related to Maithili, making wrong maps of Mithila region like [[User:Kusinara|Kusinara]] and [[User:Bihar region|Bihar region]] have done! Maithil hoon (talk) 06:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Maithil hoon: As I've explained in your talk page, you should seek WP:CONSENSUS in the respective talk pages with other users per WP:BRD. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of non-Hindi songs recorded by Udit Narayan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhadkan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Help

Hello @Fylindfotberserk Sir, I have some confusion regarding notability of a Surgeon i.e. David S. Feldman, he is a orthopaedic surgeon and have also written some papers on NIH. but i think that there are no any secondry reliable sources which discuss about the subject to establish notability and also he didnt received any prestigious award so i am having confusion that should i nominate it for deletion or not. Thanks again sir TheSlumPanda (talk) 10:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: You may start an AfD IMO, since the article lacks enough secondary sources (there is only one). Let's see. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Most welcome. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Fylindfotberserk i also encountered another page i.e., Dror Paley who runs paley institue in which David S. Feldman also works, his article also dosent have independent reliable sources which discuss in depth about him and also he don’t received any prestigious award. I nominated the previous one for AfD should I nominate this also. TheSlumPanda (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Another resume like article. Nominate it as well. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Fylindfotberserk today I encountered a article which was visited by some experienced editors but no one nominated it for deletion. I am talking about Michael Stein, i think this article does not qualify for WP:GNG or WP:NPROF because there are no independent sources which discuss about the subject in depth and also he is not not a vice chancellor or dean of any university, so i think he is absolutely not notable for having standalone articles. Should i nominate this well ??. And again thanks for your constant help sir TheSlumPanda (talk) 10:11, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSlumPanda: Yes, absolutely. I wonder how so many pages like these are kept. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also wonderd how some experienced editors avoid these things. Nomination Done. TheSlumPanda (talk) 16:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Serious concerns

Hi @Fylindfotberserk, I am not going to comment on the talk page of the Nanda Empire as I have repeated the same things, God knows how many times. But certain points I want to make to you regarding the editor in question:

1.) Relentless pushing of Krishna as a terrorist using a unique unknown source [4]. Funnily enough, these are the same people who label Al Qaeda, Maoists, Naxals, Lashkar, and Hamas as freedom fighters.

2.) The issue of continuous editing using their own inflammatory sources while the discussion is ongoing is an old habit of the editor: [5]. @Jtbobwaysf also noted that on [6]. Also, the editor choses to ignore that 'Brahmanism' is an inflammatory term coined by colonial powers and missionaries, just like 'hinayana' was coined by Mahayana Buddhists for orthodox Buddhists. Also, funny that this editor considers Witzel the ultimate authority but still won’t use Witzel’s dates as authoritative for Buddhism. Huh?

3.) It’s not limited to one Hindu or India-related page— inserting opinions as facts like they did on the Geeta page by adding that Geeta is definitely influenced by Buddhism (when Sāṃkhya is already mentioned). Then, when they found out that Sāṃkhya is known as an orthodox Hindu school that considers the Veda as the source of all knowledge, they went on the Samkhya page, pushed the dates of the Vedas, and inserted Buddhacharita (which was composed extremely late in 200 CE) along with the middle Upanishads and Geeta. They created a whole "proto-classical Sāṃkhya" section, which is not a scholarly term. On the other hand, they remove "classical Hinduism" (which is a scholarly term) wherever they can, replacing it with just "Hinduism." There was not even a fragment of Buddhacharita composed when the Geeta was fully composed and quoted day and night by Buddhists. Also, they push "South Asia" instead of "India" wherever they can while promoting "China" instead of "East Asia," if you have noticed. like her [7]. Look how they got rattled when someone changed Confucius’ place to East Asia from China, accusing them of double standards while firmly adhering to their own.

4.) They themselves changed the lead of the Hinduism page, making it "an umbrella term for various Indian religions and traditions unified by the concept of dharma." By this very definition, they made Buddhism, Vedic religion, so-called Brahmanism, Jainism, etc., part of Hinduism. So if it’s an umbrella term, then what’s the point of asserting "this was not Hinduism," "that was not Hinduism," "only synthesis is Hinduism," etc.? Pushing their views as general consensus is an old habit. I’ve told them a zillion times that common people, in the majority, can never be ascetics, especially at a time when no middle-ground schools of Buddhism had been created. Also, there were much earlier ascetic and Sāṃkhya movements than Buddhism. Still, they continuously crib about "What about common people?" "What about common people?"

5.) When someone is motivated, they don’t care about truth; they only care about POV pushing. But the problem is they are confused about how to properly POV push and on which page to add what to make more sense. Also, check out the Shakti page and the image they chose (which was later removed). I was fine with the image, but just look at the comment when this image was added to the Ātman page: [8]. That at least tells me something about the intent.

6.) Also, look at the Yoga page where they added the Jain part [9], using the Jain traditional date of 900 BC rather than the scholarly date to push their view that Yoga may just be totally non-Vedic. Also, there is no known Jainism before Mahavira (which is also dubious).

7.)Now, I have let it go. Whatever makes them happy and sleep better at night. So, I will not comment on all this nonsense on the respective talk page. I have already fought enough and concluded that I cannot change the inherent nature of anyone. They can have their little little moment of happiness Also, the person seems to get away with whatever they do, so it’s not worth fighting. I am no one and have no connections or influence. I am only letting you know in case you didn’t know, and you are a grandmaster editor who might not be fully aware of all this as people are busy with their lives. Although, I don’t have much hope from anyone to stop the vilification of Hindu and India-related pages, as there are more haters out there. These editors are the exact reason Wiki will one day get blocked in India. Then all their POV-pushing work—who will read? Their main target audience to mislead will disappear. Also, I can’t do this anymore; it’s the responsibility of concerned senior editors and admins, not mine. For some reason i thought you should know. I have given up. Too many of them. DangalOh (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy isn't a scholar of the subject matter. Only notable per WP:NPOL. Also, sources coming from this person is likely to be "non-neutral" considering he is the "the patriarch of the Marxist school of Indian historiography". - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:07, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But who cares? As potato potatoes, tomato tomatoes, POV pushers POV pushates. And I also didn't know scholars can be labeled unreliable based on some of their comments on certain unrelated hypotheses (hypotheses are hypotheses; they are not facts with empirical evidence; that's the very reason they are called hypotheses). Everyone has their own hypotheses. Non-acceptance of a hypothesis in mainstream discourse doesn’t make the person making that hypothesis unreliable as a whole. But anyway, it’s not about selectively using sources where it suits and disregarding those where it doesn’t. This POV-pushing motivation by some editors is much deeper than that. As I said, FYI, I have given up. I am not properly equipped to deal with evil of such a kind. You guys are veterans and may know what to do here better than I do. Maybe in the future, Wikipedia will be better. Right now, it’s crazy. I have fought alone for far too long. I have also messed up my studies for so many days. I have a big career-changing exam coming up in November. I’ll be mostly absent here. But as I said, haters outnumber at least 5 to 1, so I don’t know how even you or others will be able to keep up with this. Well, I am only 27 years old, so I have my whole life to get back at these people properly. For Wikipedia, I don’t care about it intensely anymore. Thanks and have a good day. DangalOh (talk) 13:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]