Jump to content

Talk:1989 Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus attack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AndreJustAndre (talk | contribs) at 00:50, 10 September 2024 (Requested move 29 August 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Massacre?

Are you really sure that it is NPOV to describe it as "massacre" and "suicide attack" ? --Magabund 14:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Massacre is defined as the mass killing of unarmed people, which this attack qualifies as. Boston Massacre and Wounded Knee Massacre are other examples. Driving a bus off a cliff qualifies as a suicide attack, as long as the attacker has suicidal intent, its a suicide attack, even though he or she may not be ultimately successful in committing suicide.--Exander (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?

Could someone provide reliable, scholarly sources that indicate use of the terms "massacre" or "suicide attack" to describe this incident? Thanks. Tiamuttalk 09:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reviving this discussion because the sources are ... not good. JP and BBC sources are both dead links leaving just Ynet supporting key details by means of trivial coverage – short of the dead sources being restored. Iskandar323 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 August 2024

Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus 405 suicide attackTel Aviv–Jerusalem bus 405 hijacking

or Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus 405 hijacking and attempted suicide.

– He survived.

FourPi (talk) 14:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 17:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose the name is significant because it’s the first example of this kind of attack in the conflict, and his lack of success is not relevant because it’s a category, not a descriptor.
FortunateSons (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't call surviving a crash a lack of success. Is their a source stating that his express intent was suicide? If not, then ... Iskandar323 (talk) 19:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if he intended suicide (or knew his death was the likely result and was willing to do it anyway), that doesn't mean we need to have the word "suicide" in the title. The title should be WP:CONCISE, without including unnecessary extra commentary, speculation or details beyond what is necessary for WP:RECOGNIZABILITY. I think the current title has too much in it. You could remove at least one of "Tel Aviv–Jerusalem" or "405" or "suicide" and it would still be a perfectly recognizable title for the topic. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sourcing here is actually pretty poor at the moment. The JP source is dead and two of the others are just summaries from prisoner exchange coverage. There's little in-depth substance other than in the journal article I've found, which doesn't say it was suicide, and says the motive appeared to be personal. The whole suicide angle therefore appears quite unsubstantiated both descriptively and in quality sourcing. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent point. We definitely shouldn't have "suicide attack" in the title if there isn't a clear consensus in sources that this is what it was (or at least that this is part of a clearly-established WP:COMMONNAME for the incident). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:45, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Bus 405 hijacking attack or sth. similar would do fine. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:39, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or no hijacking, because I do see the point that just grabbing the wheel for a second doesn't really fall into the domain of a standard hijacking. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Or course, that does depend on whether or not the person meant to die or at least accepted their self-inflicted death. If they believed they would survive, then it’s not particularly smart, but not a suicide attack. Assuming there is bad or no sourcing, just attack might be the cleanest solution, because kidnapping and attempted suicide does not convey the significant casualties. FortunateSons (talk) 21:22, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Palestine, WikiProject Military history, and WikiProject Israel have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 17:34, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: Note that the nom is blocked as a sock and can't respond. Instead of closing this, I am relisting to see if any of the suggested titles might win consensus, as it appears there is at least some desire to change the title. ASUKITE 17:36, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose replacement of the word "suicide" with the word "hijacking" because the perpetrator had no intention of holding people hostage nor driving the bus somewhere else. The fact that the perpetrator survived is a mere coincidence. He was lucky that he was not among the 16 who did die. Nonetheless, he did intend to sacrifice himself.
    I do agree with Fnlayson that more notable than the bus number is the year in which the attack took place. I would also add that the location is also more notable than the bus's origin and destination. I would therefore recommend renaming the article Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus 405 suicide attack1989 Kiryat Ye'arim suicide attack. I do see the pitfall of this proposal in that the attack did not take place inside Kiryat Ye'arim, but rather "near Kiryat Ye'arim".
    Bottom Line: the current name is probably the least worst option. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 12:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless there is an interview with the perpetrator attesting his intention to perish by his actions (i.e. established motive), the suicide label is just not really adequately supported. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    There is no need to interview the perpetrator to determine motive. It should be self-evident that trying to kill everybody on the bus, while you are on the bus, is an intention to commit suicide in the process of committing mass-murder. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 14:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Not really. And self-evidence isn't a sourcing standard. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:25, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Should add that not only is it not necessary to interview the perpetrator to determine the motive, in most cases, that's not how motives are established. If the perpetrator dies, then it's impossible to interview them, and perpetrators can, and often times do, lie about their motives. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 15:24, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    All I see is you not providing a source establishing motive. In the absence of this, one could also plausibly deem this suicide allegation a BLP violation. We can't defame an individual by asserting that they attempted to commit suicide without the strongest of sources stating exactly that. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This happened 35 years ago, so it's hard to find references. Those that I found, do not call it a suicide attack because it proceeded all the suicide attacks perpetrated by Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Therefore, we need to judge this historic event from a contemporary point of view, not from the point of view that existed at the time.
    It should be fairly obvious that while the probability for the perpetrator to have survived the attack was higher than 0% (the perpetrator survived), it was certainly much lower than 100% probability of survival. Therefore, the word 'suicide' currently in the title is absolutely justified. The Mountain of Eden (talk) 23:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The journal paper that I've already added as a source comes six years after the incident and supports none of this. It is not the place of editors to assume what thoughts were flashing through the mind of someone grabbing the wheel of a bus. That's what sources are for. Source your position, or don't give it. Iskandar323 (talk) 00:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and close. WP:BANREVERT Andre🚐 22:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That's not really addressing the substance. Regardless of how it was started, an RM has progressed and been taken with seriousness by other editors since - more than the nom himself (who provided little rationale). Iskandar323 (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As far as the substance, WP:COMMONNAME. A cursory review appears to show that while some refer to it as a "terror attack," most seem to call it a "suicide attack" even though the suicide was merely an attempt, it's still a suicide attack. Even if I search for "Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus 405 hijacking" it just comes up with links to suicide bombing. Andre🚐 00:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, for that matter, the exact title here is almost certainly pure Wikipedia invention. There are exactly two news pieces using the exact phrasing of this page title, and they are from 2022 and 2023, so in all likelihood taking their queues from Wikipedia, and not the other way around. Maybe we need a title whose main currency isn't in Wikipedia mirrors, but grounded in sources. Iskandar323 (talk) 00:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    While that's entirely possible, I'm not aware of an exception in COMMONNAME for cases of suspected citogenesis. Andre🚐 00:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    That would only be a concern if two trivial mentions in sources could establish common name, which they absolutely can't, so it's moot. Iskandar323 (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This mention is not a trivial passing mention. The No. 405 bus attack marked the most deadly attack of the intifada to that date. It has been dubbed as the first Palestinian suicide attack, and it's from 2012. Corroborated in this book source, book source, and another one here. Andre🚐 00:38, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I spoke of the only two sources that used the exact page title used here as a phrase. Though incidentally, a source saying something is "dubbed" as something very much isn't confirming in its own voice that it is something; quite the opposite. It shows clear reluctance to use voice. Iskandar323 (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The first source, Oxford University Press Terrorist Suicide Bombings, clearly says carried out the first suicide attack in its own voice, as well. Andre🚐 00:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: 1989 Tel Aviv–Jerusalem bus attack, per BarrelProof and all of the discussion above. Iskandar323 (talk) 00:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]