User talk:Gdayak

August 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Igbo people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gawaon (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sites are out there, even yours aren’t reliable, it shows you have an agenda Gdayak (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "my" sources, they were in the article for a long time. Unless you do have better ones, you should leave things as they are. Gawaon (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same some one that occasionally comes to put up lies here, your the one changing things, like i said the source is out their, yoruba man. Gdayak (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I'm WikiDan61. Your recent edit(s) to the page Igbo people appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your information is not supported by the cited sources. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Igbo people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ohnoitsjamie I’d say NOTHERE, see [1]. Changing name from title, terrible source l etc. Doug Weller talk 18:13, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yoour funny, I brought a source , tell me which source you have !! Gdayak (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]