User talk:Opelogbon

Vandalism of accurate edit by user

Hi editors,

This user Waleewedemi who is a staff of Segun Adebutu keeps removing the edit on his page even when the content is accurate. The new column talked about the detention of Segun Adebutu by the anti-graft agency called Economic and Financial Crimes Commission . He has removed the new column with authentic reference thrice.

Opelogbon (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Segun Adebutu, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Lapablo (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Lapablo, Edit was reviewed by TransporterMan and WP:PUBLICFIGURE was satisfied. Previous editor Waleewedemi was blocked indefinitely for vandalism. Opelogbon (talk) 13:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism accusations

Opelogbon, I'm going to strongly recommend that you stop making accusations of vandalism. Very few things here at Wikipedia are actually considered vandalism, see WP:VANDNOT, and accusing editors of vandalism when what they've done is not vandalism is itself a violation of our conduct policies. (And remember that in adjudging what people have done we are to assume good faith.) In some ways worse than that, however, experienced editors here know when things are vandalism and when they're not and accusing people of vandalism when it's not just makes you look bad. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

TransporterMan Thank you for the enlightenment. My concern is with the way the controversial column is been edited and deleted in spite of the resolution reached on it. I am sure in the next few days, same thing will happen to the page. Perhaps, if it is protected, such intrusion without new reliable sources can be checked. Again, thank you very much. Opelogbon (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't think that the intrusions have yet reached the level that an administrator would be willing to fully protect the article. That's generally only done when the activity becomes so frequent that ordinary editing and watchfulness are strained to handle it. But I'm keeping the idea in mind. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Opelogbon, You are just reverting the changes on page of Segun Adebutu without any proper reference. The new content which has been added is provided by the same News Agency which published this news. Kindly read it first before making any further changes. ThanksKaimano97 (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Opelogbon, title of the controversy section is wrong according to wikipedia policy of criticism. Kindly check WP:Criticism and read when controversy word can be used. Kaimano97 (talk) 10:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Kaimano97, sorry but WP:Criticism is only an essay, not policy (see the box at the top of that page), and is only an opinion. It's not binding on anyone and may not reflect the general practices or consensus in the encyclopedia. So that argument does not work. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peoples gazette (October 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peoples gazette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peoples gazette, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Opelogbon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lapablo (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Peoples gazette

Hello, Opelogbon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peoples gazette, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peoples gazette (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peoples gazette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peoples gazette, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peoples Gazette (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peoples Gazette and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peoples Gazette, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

AngusWOOF Thank you for the review. As shown in the reference, some reliable sources in Nigeria have established the notability of the platform. The Punch Vanguard (Nigeria) P.M. News The Guardian (Nigeria). Platforms such as Premium Times . A notable columnist Farooq Kperogi has written several times in his column on Nigerian Tribune the credibility of the news platform Opelogbon (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

All corrections made and page updated with new content. Thanks Opelogbon (talk) 09:04, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peoples Gazette has been accepted

Peoples Gazette, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:38, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tolulope Ebun for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tolulope Ebun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolulope Ebun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 17:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm Jamiebuba. I noticed that you recently removed content from Flutterwave without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Jamiebuba for the input. I actually explained the reason for the removal. None of the references provided for the content satisfied reliable source. You may wish to check the edit histroy and the talk page as well. Thanks Opelogbon (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

The response on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest does not apply. Just can check my edit history. I have been contributing to issues around Nigeria and Africa. If this content has Wikipedia:Reliable sources this dispute wont arise. If you also go through the edit of the page, you will discover I created the controversy section as well. Opelogbon (talk) 22:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flutterwave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)