User talk:Tóraí

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Tóraí}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy Eleventh Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Tóraí a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goodness, is it that long? Well done. ww2censor (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:BISE

Template:BISE has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

This is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hiya. Would you have any issues if I nominated the Cork railway tunnel article for a "did you know" entry? Something in the "longest operational rail tunnel in Ireland [..] 2 million bricks [..] etc etc" line? Guliolopez (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great. Go ahead and do it. I was thinking along the sames lines but couldn't think of a hook, but that's a nice one. --Tóraí (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Apologies. I tried to take some time to find additional sources to support the "hook". Including the "2 million bricks" piece. And, while I found and added an additional source, it actually conflicted with the existing. With the clock ticking on the 7-day rule for DYK, I couldn't figure out a new/compromise hook. And that window is now passed. Another time... Guliolopez (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sesame Tree.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sesame Tree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Life in the Republic of Ireland

Template:Life in the Republic of Ireland has been nominated for merging with Template:Ireland topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Celtic nations has been nominated for deletion

Category:Celtic nations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ipn request

Template:Ipn request has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:56, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Old IP indef

Hi, Tóraí. I was looking through old IP indefs and came upon Special:Contribs/76.16.222.162. There's a good chance that that IP address has been reassigned in the 12 years since it was blocked, so would you object to my unblocking it? Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 21:16, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin, that sounds probable. I've looked back at the history and it appears like it was nothing but vandalism from that IP over an extended period. But, yes, it's probable that it has been reassigned since. Happy to let you unblock and we can keep an eye on it. -- Tóraí (talk) 22:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]