User talk:Minorax
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
?
These images have been there since 22 Jan 2009 - 14.5 years - and have satisfied Wikipedia's requirements for 14.5 years.
- 1) What has changed that suddenly makes them "unacceptable".
- 2) Why, after being there for 14.5 years, do they suddenly need deleting?
Pdfpdf (talk) 13:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- Simply putting "WP" as a source is not helpful for license verification. It might be okay 14 years ago, but it certainly isn't now. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:20, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- So what are you, and/or wikipedia doing to address the problem that something that has been OK for 14.5 years is suddenly not OK now? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
- P.S. Further, I asked you two questions. You have made zero effort to answer either of them. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:47, 4 June 2023 (UTC)