Jump to content

Secondary forest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pfeifkat000 (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 2 April 2023 (Removed two sentences that were not well supported by literature and lacked notability.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The forest in Stanley Park, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada is generally considered to have second and third growth characteristics. This photo shows regeneration, a tree growing out of the stump of another tree that was felled in 1962 by the remnants of Typhoon Freda.

A secondary forest (or second-growth forest) is a forest or woodland area which has regenerated through largely natural processes after human-caused disturbances, such as timber harvest or agriculture clearing, or equivalently disruptive natural phenomena.[1] It is distinguished from an old-growth forest (primary or primeval forest), which has not recently undergone such disruption, and complex early seral forest, as well as third-growth forests that result from harvest in second growth forests. Secondary forest regrowing after timber harvest differs from forest regrowing after natural disturbances such as fire, insect infestation, or windthrow because the dead trees remain to provide nutrients, structure, and water retention after natural disturbances. Secondary forests are notably different from primary forests in their composition and biodiversity; however, they may still be helpful in providing habitat for native species, preserving watersheds, and restoring connectivity between ecosystems.[2]

Development

Depending on the forest, the development of primary characteristics may take anywhere from a century to several millennia. Hardwood forests of the eastern United States, for example, can develop primary characteristics in one or two generations of trees, or 150–500 years. Often the disruption is the result of human activity, such as logging, but natural phenomena that produce the same effect are often included in the definition. Secondary forests tend to have trees closer spaced than primary forests and contain less undergrowth than primary forests. Secondary forests typically were thought to lack biodiversity compared to primary forests,[3] however this has been challenged in recent years.[citation needed] Usually, secondary forests have only one canopy layer, whereas primary forests have several.

Secondary forestation is common in areas where forests have been lost by the slash-and-burn method, a component of some shifting cultivation systems of agriculture. Secondary forests may also arise from forest that has been harvested heavily or over a long period of time, forest that is naturally regenerating from fire and from abandoned pastures or areas of agriculture. It takes a secondary forest typically forty to 100 years to begin to resemble the original old-growth forest; however, in some cases a secondary forest will not succeed, due to erosion or soil nutrient loss in certain tropical forests.

Secondary forests re-establish by the process of succession. Openings created in the forest canopy allow sunlight to reach the forest floor. An area that has been cleared will first be colonized by pioneer species. Even though some species loss may occur with primary forest removal, a secondary forest can protect the watershed from further erosion and provides habitat. Secondary forests may also buffer edge effects around mature forest fragments and increase connectivity between them. They may also be a source of wood and other forest products.

Today most of the forests of the United States- especially in the eastern part of North America, as well as forests of Europe consist of secondary forest.

Characteristics

Biodiversity

When forests are harvested, they either regenerate naturally or artificially (by planting and seeding select tree species). The result is often a second growth forest which is less biodiverse than the old growth forest.[3]

Low to moderate disturbances have been shown to be extremely beneficial to increase in biodiversity in secondary forests.[4] These secondary disturbances can clear the canopies to encourage lower canopy growth as well as provide habitats for small organisms such as insects, bacteria and fungi which may feed on the decaying plant material.

Climate change mitigation

Biomes

Rainforests

In the case of semi-tropical rainforests, where soil nutrient levels are characteristically low, the soil quality may be significantly diminished following the removal of primary forest. In addition to soil nutrient levels, two areas of concern with tropical secondary forest restoration are plant biodiversity and carbon storage; it has been suggested that it takes longer for a tropical secondary forest to recover its biodiversity levels than its carbon pools.[5] In Panama, growth of new forests from abandoned farmland exceeded loss of primary rainforest in 1990.[6] However, due to the diminished quality of soil, among other factors, the presence of a significant majority of primary forest species fail to recover in these second-growth forests.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Chokkalingam, U.; de Jong, W. (2001-11-12). "Array - CIFOR Knowledge". CIFOR. Retrieved 2023-04-02.
  2. ^ Rozendaal, Danaë M. A.; Bongers, Frans; Aide, T. Mitchell; Alvarez-Dávila, Esteban; Ascarrunz, Nataly; Balvanera, Patricia; Becknell, Justin M.; Bentos, Tony V.; Brancalion, Pedro H. S.; Cabral, George A. L.; Calvo-Rodriguez, Sofia; Chave, Jerome; César, Ricardo G.; Chazdon, Robin L.; Condit, Richard (March 2019). "Biodiversity recovery of Neotropical secondary forests". Science Advances. 5 (3): eaau3114. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau3114. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 6402850. PMID 30854424.
  3. ^ a b Chazdon, Robin L. (2008). "Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands" (PDF). Science. 320 (5882): 1458–1460. Bibcode:2008Sci...320.1458C. doi:10.1126/science.1155365. PMID 18556551. S2CID 206511664.
  4. ^ Martin, Maxence; Morin, Hubert; Fenton, Nicole J. (2019-12-11). "Secondary disturbances of low and moderate severity drive the dynamics of eastern Canadian boreal old-growth forests". Annals of Forest Science. 76 (4): 108. doi:10.1007/s13595-019-0891-2. ISSN 1297-966X.
  5. ^ Martin, Philip A.; Newton, Adrian C.; Bullock, James M. (2013-12-22). "Carbon pools recover more quickly than plant biodiversity in tropical secondary forests". Proceedings. Biological Sciences. 280 (1773): 20132236. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2236. ISSN 1471-2954. PMC 3826225. PMID 24197410.
  6. ^ "New Jungles Prompt a Debate on Rain Forests" article by Elisabeth Rosenthal in The New York Times January 29, 2009

General References