User talk:Chid12

Welcome!

WELCOME!! Hello, Chid12! I want to personally welcome you on behalf of the Wikipedia community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you haven't already, you can put yourself in the new user log and the list of users so you can be properly introduced to everyone. Don't forget to be bold, and don't be afraid of hungry Wikipedians...there's a rule about not biting newcomers. Some other good links are the tutorial, how to edit a page, or if you're really stuck, see the help pages. Wikipedia is held up by Five Pillars...I recommend reading about them if you haven't already. Finally, it would be really helpful if you would sign your name on talk pages, so people can get back to you quickly. It's easy to do this by clicking the button (next to the one with the "W" crossed out) one from the end on the left. If that's confusing, or if you have any questions, feel free to drop me a ♪ at my talk page (by clicking the plus sign (+) next to the tab at the top that says "edit this page")...and again, welcome!--ViolinGirl^♪ 01:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Thorpe

Just wanted to check with you. You deleted the LGBT category from my sandbox version of the Jeremy Thorpe article, but didn't make any changes to the bona fide article in Wikipedia. Looks like you may have searched for Mr Thorpe and ended up in my sandbox by mistake. I understand your reasons for deleting the category, presumably because Jeremy Thorpe has never officially come out, and such categorisation is based on conjecture rather than fact. However, you need to make the change to the Wikipedia article itself if you wish this to be reflected officially, as you have only so far succeeded in editing my 'work in progress'. Cheers. Hairybottle 18:22, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Age of consent in Europe

Hi! Your additions to this page have been excellent. Thank you for both the quantity and quality of your work which has moved the Age of consent cleanup project forward. Cheers! --Monotonehell 00:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've removed my material on the Sewel convention from the UK section, on the basis that it is to do with legislative procedure rather than the age of consent. True. But if this is to be the standard, then the references to the Parliament Act 1911 will have to go too.--George Burgess 19:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Linky the lion.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Linky the lion.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Legal writings

Hello there. I'm a fellow English law editor (I recently got Gray's Inn to FA) and I was wondering if you'd like to collaborate on a few things. Current targets include:

Inner Temple
Courts of England and Wales
All articles on English contract law (an aim is GA for all the core topics).

Give me a poke if you'd be interested in any of these things. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 08:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Louca

Hi, I must say it's nice to bump into a fellow English law editor when patrolling new pages! They seem to be a scarce commodity! I just wanted to let you know I've moved the article on the Luca case to Louca v German Judicial Authority since the title seemed overly long and detailed. I've also written a sentence to kick off the lead section. I wonder if you have the date the case was heard and/or the "All ER" number for it. It could do with a little context adding to it and a few references when you get round to it. I'll keep an eye on it and add anything I can to the article. If I can help, or you want to talk, please get in touch. HJMitchell You rang? 16:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases under Lord Phillips

I have nominated List of Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases under Lord Phillips, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Supreme Court of the United Kingdom cases under Lord Phillips. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ajbpearce (talk) 00:39, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marriages (Same Sex Couples)

Hey Chid. Just a quick note to thank you for the changes you're making to that article. Very helpful :) doktorb _words^deeds 12:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC) Whoops, I ballsed up there....doktorb _words^deeds 12:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	A very heartfelt and genuine thank you for the work you have done on Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, turning a bare-bones article into a tiny little masterpiece. doktorb _words^deeds 00:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift - 2013 Eurovision Song Contest

OK, sorry. Handsome128^talk 17:49, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Thornton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chid12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chid12. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chid12. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]