Jump to content

User talk:Flemingdon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flemingdon (talk | contribs) at 23:41, 31 December 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please leave messages for mere here or on my reddit account of the same name.

Welcome!

Hello, PvOberstein, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 05:06, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Christopher Steele
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair
The Moscow rules
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Halo Reach

On the halo reach page, you put that Kat and Carter are alive. They actually died in the halo reach game. Carter dies when he suicide bombs the huge scarab with his pelican. Kat dies when she is sniped in the back of the head by a needle rifle. No one on noble team survives except for jun, this is what makes the game so good, noble six sacrificed everything even his life, but they keep the covenant from taking reach. WhiteAndNerdy (talk) 02:59, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kat and Carter

You said "Kat and Carter are the only ones in noble team who survived". Jun was the only one to survive everything that happened. WhiteAndNerdy (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kat and Carter

My bad I I'm new to editing on Wikipedia, I was not able to edit the Halo reach page and I saw that it was last edited by you. So I thought that you were able to edit it because you created it, my apologies. It bugs me that it is not correct and I want to fix it. WhiteAndNerdy (talk) 11:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ezra Cohen-Watnick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Flynn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabzar Bhat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabzar Bhat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabzar Bhat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stephen 00:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:PvOberstein

User:PvOberstein, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:PvOberstein and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:PvOberstein during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Marvellous Spider-Man 17:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marvellous Spider-Man, can you please detail your rationale? PvOberstein (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1108th Signal Brigade

Hello, PvOberstein. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 1108th Signal Brigade, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 08:36, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Just sent you an e-mail. You're welcome. Amyzex (talk) 17:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ghost Fleet: A Novel of the Next World War) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ghost Fleet: A Novel of the Next World War, PvOberstein!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add an infobox per Template:Infobox book

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 09:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Maxwell moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Elizabeth Maxwell, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. — InsertCleverPhraseHere 02:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cruentation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Geographic
Nibelungenlied (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Geographic
Pamiris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Geographic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted on Griffon Ramsey -- privacy of living people

Hi, I've reverted your edit on Griffon Ramsey. Per WP:BLPPRIVACY, Wikipedia does not publish potentially sensitive information such as full names if the information is not already broadly available to the public. If you have to hunt down an obscure decade-old document to find someone's middle name, then their middle name shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 02:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably remove the middle initial then, IagoQnsi. PvOberstein (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PvOberstein. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

Hello,

I noticed that your userpage had an excessive number of external links, which leads me to believe that its primary purpose is to promote yourself. If you wouldn't mind removing some of them per WP:NOTSOCIALMEDIA, that would be fantastic...

Thanks, TJH2018talk 18:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @TJH2018:, I've already been down this road before ( [1].) As per Wikipedia:User_pages#Personal_and_privacy-breaching_material, "Some people add personal information such as contact details (email, instant messaging, etc.)", which is what I was judged to be doing. You can check my contribution log (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PvOberstein) to show that I'm far more interested in editing Wikipedia than social networking.

PvOberstein (talk) 18:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Pruitt

You may want to weigh in at Talk:Scott Pruitt, as there is currently a discussion there regarding content imported from Definers Public Affairs, an article you started. Marquardtika (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And weighed in I have. Those these edit scuffles never end well for me. PvOberstein (talk) 04:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Electronics Technology Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Facial recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nadyr Khachiliev

When you create an article and put alternative names in bold it's supposed to be because they are the target of incoming redirects (or sometimes dab page entries or hatnotes), so that the reader can see why they've arrived. But you didn't provide any redirects from the alternative versions. Redirects from alternative names, spellings etc, are really helpful to the encyclopedia: they help the reader find what they want, and they also make it less likely that an enthusiastic but misguided future editor will accidentally create a duplicate article. Thanks. I've made 3 redirects for this person, using the names you specified. PamD 14:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Yemeni Civil War (2015-present), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ansar Allah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stormy Daniels, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dropbox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Would you mind simplifying your edit summaries? They don't need to describe every tiny edit. "Copy edits" covers most of it, and other short phrases would probably serve the purpose well for others. The long summaries (IOW they aren't true "summaries"...) totally f***up my watchlist because I have a number of those articles on my watchlist. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 04:17, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emmet Flood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colloquium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Star Shadow (UAV) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Star Shadow (UAV), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:22, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arirang Festival, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Applied Research Associates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Applied Research Associates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natureium (talk) 17:26, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adam Koenig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Black lung
Qoryoley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Al-Shabab

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adam Koenig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black lung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blockstack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blockstack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockstack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kamil Ekim Alptekin

Hello, PvOberstein. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kamil Ekim Alptekin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 11:45, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PvOberstein. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Test.

Team_SKGA (January 23, 2019). "Team_SKGA comments on CRWBY S2E12 THUMBNAIL & Description". reddit.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Baledogle Airfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Shabab (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabzar Bhat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabzar Bhat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabzar Bhat (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBigXrayᗙ 07:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 20:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudy Giuliani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Comité international pour la protection des droits de l'homme

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talk:Comité international pour la protection des droits de l'homme, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 05:36, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elizabeth Maxwell

Information icon Hello, PvOberstein. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elizabeth Maxwell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elizabeth Maxwell

Hello, PvOberstein. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elizabeth Maxwell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Flemingdon&oldid=1130785023"