Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SKC Corporation
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) at 18:44, 23 February 2022 (Fix misnested tag lint errors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 18:44, 23 February 2022 by WOSlinkerBot (talk | contribs) (Fix misnested tag lint errors)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 02:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP (not listed in fortune/forbes, no notable press releases found). Also, article is almost indecipherable and my attempted copyedit failed to reveal any rescuable information. Kcordina 11:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Generic, non-notable forum. Kcordina 11:36, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom, WP:CORP. PJM 12:14, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, has major press coverage like [1] [2] [3] Kappa 13:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Kappa. It doesn't mean that an article must be a Fortune 500 company or listed in Forbes magazine to be notable. --Terence Ong 15:39, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. My copy of the Weekend Financial Times saw fit to mention Moody's upping SKC's rating in a front-page briefing. If the FT thinks they're important enough for that, they're most definitely important wnough for an article. --Calton | Talk 04:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Kappa. Ardenn 04:02, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Yet another case of NN presumed from lack of familiarity. A little quick digging showed that SKC is not only listed on the Korean stock market [4], but is in the KOSPI 200 index, the South Korean equivalent of the NASDAQ 100 or S&P 500. Nationally/regionally notable is notable. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 23:18, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above.--Tone 23:19, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.