Jump to content

User:HyBn51702/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HyBn51702 (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 10 November 2021 (→‎mv). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

AF and removal

In 1926, acting on a judgment made a decade earlier by Benedict XV, Pius XI condemned Action Française, the monarchist movement that viewed Catholicism as the bulwark of a restored pre-industrial French state.

WHY?

The Pope judged that it was folly for the French Church to continue to tie its fortunes to the unlikely dream of a monarchist restoration, and distrusted the movement's tendency to defend the Catholic religion in merely utilitarian and nationalistic terms. Action Française never recovered.[1][2]

In 1927, Pope Pius XI instructed Archbishop Louis Le Hunsec, superior general of the Holy Ghost Fathers, to remove Le Floch from his position as rector. After Gasparri intervened, Le Floch was allowed to resign. He left the Seminary on 18 July 1927.[3] The ostensible rationale was the fact that his political views, especially his support for the right-wing political group Action Française and its founder Charles Maurras, were at odds with the Vatican's attempt at rapprochement with the French government. French government officials had also sought his removal and unsympathetic clerics both in France and Rome sought his removal.[4][5]

refs
  1. ^ Latourette, Christianity in a Revolutionary Age pp 37–38
  2. ^ Eugen Weber (1962). Action Française: Royalism and Reaction in Twentieth-Century France. Stanford U.P. p. 249. ISBN 9780804701341.
  3. ^ Cleary, William (2018). Spiritan Life and Mission Since Vatican II. Wipf & Stock. p. 50n56. Retrieved 28 October 2021.
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference airiau was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Koren, Henry J. (1958). "Chapter 11: The Generalate of Archbishop Louis Le Hunsec, 1926-1950". The Spiritans: A History of the Congregation of the Holy Ghost. Duquesne Studies, Spritan Series vol. 1. Duquesne University. pp. 284–8. Retrieved 27 October 2021.

Henri Le Floch writing

more

  • A bit more in Spiritan Life and Mission
  • Koren, to the ends of the earth c p 400
  • Jacques Prévotat, La Condemnation

Nails it

Notes

References

Joseph Lécuyer

Note on Marcel Lefebvre


  • June 1968 just before the HGF convention he is spokesman on changes in ordination formula

here: https://www.nytimes.com/1968/06/19/archives/pope-alters-ordination-and-consecration-rites-spokesman-says.html


Later (1970) conductor to the Congrrgation on the Clergy and occasional spokesman see https://www.nytimes.com/1970/02/10/archives/vatican-asking-all-priests-to-affirm-celibacy-yearly-move-appears.html

apology

2007 commission on interreligious relations, social cohesion, etc

l On 21 November 2007, in a letter published in Quebec French-language newspapers,[a]

Admission of failings

I recognize that the narrow attitudes of certain Catholics, prior to 1960, favoured anti-Semitism, racism, indifference toward First Nations and discrimination against women and homosexuals. The behaviour of Catholics and certain episcopal authorities with regards to the right to vote, access to work and promotion of women, hasn’t always been up to par with society’s needs or conformed to the social doctrine of the church.

I also recognize that abuses of power and cover-ups have, for many, tarnished the image of the clergy and its moral authority: mothers have been rebuffed by priests without concern for their family obligations; youngsters were subject to sexual aggression by priests and religious figures, causing great injury and traumatism which have broken their lives! These scandals have shaken popular confidence toward religious authorities and we understand this! orry for all this sin!

Call:

As pastor of a mainly Catholic people, you will understand that the handing down of our cultural and religious heritage is close to my heart. That is why I reiterate my support to parents who have the right to receive a religious instruction at school true to their convictions. I therefore join them in asking the State to respect the Quebec tradition of handing down religious teachings at school, not necessarily BY the school, and allow churches and recognised religious groups to teach confessional courses, conceived and paid for by them. And in the name of everyone’s religious liberty, state ethics and religious culture courses should be optional.


Ouellet apologized for what he described as past "errors" of the Roman Catholic Church in Quebec. Among the errors he wrote about were attitudes, prior to 1960, which promoted "anti-Semitism, racism, indifference to First Nations and discrimination against women and homosexuals."[3][4][5]

[6]

[7]


N
  1. ^ The text of Ouellet's letter is available in the original French[1] and in an English translation.[2]
R
  1. ^ Ouellet, Marc (21 November 2007). "Lettre ouverte aux catholiques du Québec - «Pardon pour tout ce mal!»". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved 6 August 2021.
  2. ^ Ouellet, Marc (29 August 2008). "Cardinal Ouellet's issues mea culpa to Quebec". The Catholic Register. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008.
  3. ^ "Quebecers reluctantly accept archbishop's apology". CBC News. 21 November 2007. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  4. ^ "Surprised by reactions, cardinal insists apology was an 'act of peace'". CBC News. 22 November 2007. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  5. ^ Bourgault-Côté, Guillaume (21 November 2007). "Le cardinal Ouellet confesse certaines fautes de l'Église". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved 6 August 2021.
  6. ^ Bourgault-Côté, Guillaume (22 November 2007). "La confession de Mgr Ouellet suscite le scepticisme". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved 6 August 2021.
  7. ^ Leclerc, Jean-Claude (26 November 2007). "La lettre de Mgr Ouellet aux catholiques - L'archevêque de Québec se trompe d'époque". Le Devoir (in French). Retrieved 6 August 2021.

appts

the Pontifical Committee for International Eucharistic Congresses

abortion

Ouellet campaigned in Ottawa on 13 May for Canada's federal government action on abortion[a] While attending a rally against abortion in Quebec City on 15 May 2010, Ouellet responded to a journalist's question that abortion is a "moral crime [as serious as murder]" and never justified.

Is this when he asks must there be another one?

Met with "a firestorm of criticism from politicians and women's groups" like who hear a call for criminalization in Ouellet's use of the word "crime"; condemned him for reopening a sensitive debate that Canadian court had settled in 1988.[1]

Spokesman stands by substance but says no call for recriminalization.


saying "But there is already a victim. Must there be another one?" xxxxx condemned him for reopening a sensitive debate that Canadian court had settled in 1988, he protested he was not called for a return to the criminalization of abortion. While not withdrawing his earlier remarks, he called for the government to take an better balanced approach and provide support to women who wanted to see their pregnancies through.

[1]

He urged the federal government to help pregnant women keep their child. He said that "Governments are funding clinics for abortion. I would like equity for organizations that are defending also life."

Speaking for Canada federal government, Harper Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Josée Verner said: "To suggest that we could reopen the debate on abortion is unacceptable."[1]

Having earlier applauded prime minister Stephen Harper's government for its stance against funding abortions in the developing world, he added: "If they do not want to fund abortion abroad and they do not bring at home more help to women to keep their child, I think they are incoherent".[2]

N
  1. ^ not clear what Ouellet was asking for, rally participants on the 13th "where activists and some MPs urged the federal government to reopen the debate on abortion in Canada".[1]
R
  1. ^ a b c d "Cardinal's abortion remarks anger politicians". CBC News. 17 May 2010. Retrieved 8 October 2018.
  2. ^ "Quebec archbishop defends comments on abortion". CTV News. 27 May 2010. Retrieved 12 March 2013.

Marx

Marx and other German bishops as well have been widely criticized, including from other bishops,[who?] about a 'synodal' path for reform of the church that they are alleged to be conducting within the church in Germany. Attempts by Marx and the German bishops to try to have synods that make decisions for church issues within Germany are seen by such critics as being on a path to 'schism' and 'heresy'. Others, however, have given support for this path, including Brisbane Archbishop Mark Coleridge who dismissed the criticism and said in May 2021 "I have great confidence in the Germans, in Cardinal Marx."[1]

  1. ^ Mickens, Robert (11 May 2021). "Australian archbishop says there's no stopping pope's push for synodality". Catholic Outlook. Retrieved 8 June 2021. Originally published as: Mickens, Robert (7 May 2021). "Australian archbishop says there's no stopping pope's push for synodality". La Croix International. Retrieved 8 June 2021.

code

 [[Wikipedia:SPS|{{sup|[''self-published'']}}]]