Jump to content

User talk:Materialscientist

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Makibeki (talk | contribs) at 15:05, 2 November 2021 (On overwriting the Bahaghari page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


A barnstar for you!

The Purple Barnstar
Hi Materialscientist, I find you often get flooded with talk page messages, some of which may not be the most constructive. You seem to be extremely busy all the time. Yet, you still remain steadfast and continue to contribute greatly to many areas of Wikipedia as a revered administrator and CheckUser. Thanks for your services! Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 09:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page deletion request, my redirect error

Hi. Can you please delete Raceforce Media and Talk:Raceforce Media. I accidentally moved Pacific Star Network to "Raceforce Media" and now Raceforce Media is a redirect to Sports Entertainment Group in error. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DaHuzyBru (talk) 15:08, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Did you get a chance to see my post before it was archived? (and if so, any thoughts?) Thanks - wolf 05:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

S

But I included that happened only i dont know how to cite the source so pls help me Sridhar sr3 (talk) 16:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chulek/Chulek (Village)

The synthesizer guy did not take the hint. Can't move it back myself, so if you'd be so kind, i'd much appreciate it. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 13:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've just reverted an IP editor at Sunil_Dutt who changed his date of birth to 1929. I've just followed the two references offered for his date of birth, which are obituaries, and both appear to support the IP editor's date, not the date to which you've reverted. I'm not reverting back, seems like an edit-war, and I don't trust my maths, but would you mind checking if your reversion was in fact correct? Many thanks! Elemimele (talk) 17:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

philip k dick

obviously you haven't read the book ubik. 68.199.58.244 (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I do not think you are a vandal! --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
For blocking a vandal, and then unblocking a fine administrator, I award you the Admin's Barnstar. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 21:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the self-blocks?

I count five so far in the past 1.5 years. Softlavender (talk) 23:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you do this every time a troll calls you a vandal? Softlavender (talk) 23:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan hospitals

Hi, can you please keep an eye on this user Sufeanveih as he seems disruptive. He has redirected quite a few articles about large Pakistani hospitals while creating mini-stub articles about much smaller hospitals that all seem to be run by christian charities so he seems to be following a biased agenda. I've reverted the redirects and left a message on his talkpage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, I missed the hijacking, they are probably coi or upe, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Serial Passage article

the current link in this article leads to Thomas Weller, a German football player, instead of Thomas Huckle Weller, the nobel prize winner. Why did you revert my edit? 2A02:908:1081:32A0:A068:263A:9CD4:CF2C (talk) 13:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Materialscientist

Sir.

Please explain why you removed entry for Canadian-born actor John Drainie with reference to Order of Canada.

He was a personal friend of myself and my parents and should be able to have updated correct information added to his page, however where does one go for any ' reference ' when the instance in question occurred, in this case, 54 years ago and all involved at that time in 1966 are now amongst the departed ?

Same exact thing happened on removal of original straight facts concerning Canadian champion athlete Donovan Bailey ?

Additionally, a person named Hockett removes far too many entries and really should be spoken to as he has no idea about sports so is not an appropriate person to be doing these wrongful removals.

You must know and be well aware there are thousands of entries on Wikipedia with no reference (#) attached so these new changes seem to be wrong, not correct, not at all sensible, mostly totally arbitrary at best and are not at all appreciated by the many having items removed in which every one of them are only doing so in order to help to make all of this better for Wikipedia viewers who wish to know as much data / facts as possible when seeing any page.


Try to look at the big picture in all of this as it would be very easy to see your contributor numbers begin to drastically drop as many are not happy with seeing their individual entries removed for what seem to be no proper reason(s).

Thank You. 70.27.20.229 (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist - just for context, I suspect that there is block evasion across several 70.27 IPs, so I might seem a little impatient with this IP's grammatical oddities. See this blocked user: User talk:COLONEL77. There are common editing themes (geography and subjects), similarities in writing style, and unique grammatical constructs (such as the indiscriminate substitution of "however" for "but"). I don't know if I have enough for an SPI yet - an SPI was filed (on a different IP) by another editor last year and judged inconclusive - but I am quite familiar with this editing pattern. I'm curious what the IP has to say about it. When I have brought up block evasion on previous edits, the user has not addressed it. Larry Hockett (Talk) 00:54, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that Anand Kayralath (temporarily blocked by you) and GuardedEdits belong to this farm? Although there are differences and recent checks have not uncovered either user, it seems like there are enough similarities to warrant a direct check.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked Anand Kayralath via AIV and did not think about any socking on that account, thus no comments in this regard. Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

USCGC Daniel Tarr citation

Hello, I tried to add content to the Daniel Tarr page, the nickname of the main gun of the ship. It was removed due to not being cited, but I'm not aware of anything to cite for this information. How would I go about citing it? StopMedusa (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Economy of Toulouse

Hi Materialscientist. Sorry to contact you. The IP vandal user has again reverted what you did : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Economy_of_Toulouse&type=revision&diff=1049894922&oldid=1049894336 ; Can you please help. Thanks a lot in advance.--RutoSu (talk) 13:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, Materialscientist reverted my nomination of the article for speedy deletion. You, on the other hand, have been repeatedly removing maintenance templates while logged out. You warned about this in February by User:Ponyo. Please stop. 2A01:4C8:61:4F01:18E7:9FF7:5AD1:8E06 (talk) 13:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop vandalism and having fun on Wikipedia. This is not allowed. Thank you very much.--RutoSu (talk) 14:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for your help : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A2A01%3A4C8%3A61%3A4F01%3A18E7%3A9FF7%3A5AD1%3A8E06&type=revision&diff=1049895711&oldid=1049802289 I hope vandalism will stop. Thanks again. --RutoSu (talk) 14:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop it, RutoSu. I have warned you on your page. 2A01:4C8:61:4F01:18E7:9FF7:5AD1:8E06 is definitely not a vandal. See for example this excellent edit. Bishonen | tålk 14:07, 14 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]
I have left you a message on your talk page. This ip user just want to have conflict and play. It is tiring. I hope you will realize. --RutoSu (talk) 14:10, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bishonen and Materialscientist, wouldn't you agree that the article is currently both poorly sourced and written in a highly promotional tone? I don't want to breach 3RR again, and would appreciate the maintenance templates being restored. 2A01:4C8:61:4F01:18E7:9FF7:5AD1:8E06 (talk) 14:13, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Janna munoz

Going to report shortly, but FYI, user is definitely a sock, WP:DUCK. Magitroopa (talk) 14:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And there. Magitroopa (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleted my edits

Why do you call it Hindu religion it's not religion its culture. It's sanatana dharma. Sharma Jayesh (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And why mythology, it's not a myth it's reality. (Jesus christ is mythology, Allah is mythology?) Sharma Jayesh (talk) 18:00, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

important

The user suneye1 is using loop holes in wikipidea policies to edit based on his ideology. He is reverting all edits with reliable citations using some fake things. It is clear example of misuisng the previleges.

Ip Block/re-create account

I saw you've blocked 112.141.29.240 for vandalized at Evan Berger for 31 hours only, but if look at previous history you'll find that 27.111.71.203 (after I gave final warning) & Jjmcgungho2 (creates new account from same ip) doing same thing, vandalized Evan Berger. Can you check it once time? and block them for long time. Thanks ~ Limited Idea4me (talk) 09:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.

Singer k.s Chitra has a lot of titles without evidence for them Indhira Priyadarshini (talk) 15:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

I don't have a direct citation, but you can hear Busy Bee say "Bawithaba" in the song which came out well before Kid Rock's song. Wikipedia won't accept YouTube links as citations, and I can't even link it here as wikipedia has blacklisted YouTube entirely.

Copy/paste this link and remove the space I added to bypass the blacklist filter. https://yo utu.be/LSjX8GQ4QJQ

Gamilaraay

Hi there - I'm not sure what's wrong with this edit. I'm happy to take your word for it. On the other hand, I'm curious as to why. thanks :) --Merbabu (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked IP

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that whomever is using the IP that you blocked is back using another IP (same geolocation and ISP as the blocked one). M.Bitton (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock requests

Can you have a look at the unblock requests at User talk:ZayulRasco & User talk:Zayul? They both relate to a CU block by you. JBW (talk) 20:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please look at User:Pixfinderstudio, a likely sock of the above account you blocked. Thanks! MT TrainTalk 08:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

169.244.199.229 block

Just wanted to let you know that the IP 169.244.199.229 that you blocked for 10 years some time ago is a shared IP address belonging to Hebron Academy. You may want to tell the school about this, considering the length of the block in question. (I'm no admin, though, it's just what I'd do) wizzito | say hello! 10:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Going off the policy in WP:IPB, by the way: "Some organizations have an Incident Response Team that has demonstrated willingness and ability to be responsive to reports of abuse at the source (the user). In those cases, it is preferable to contact their response team through the provided contact information rather than blocking all or part of their IP ranges – although it remains appropriate to place short blocks to interrupt ongoing vandalism or disruption ... Organizations should be encouraged to be involved in managing disruption caused by their users to avoid the inconvenience to their other users. When placing a long block on an IP or IP range, a politely worded email to the organization's IT suggesting that they participate this way would be a good idea, and it is important to be liberal in unblocking ranges of organizations that collaborate." wizzito | say hello! 10:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dhammadinnā, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance Party edits

Thank you for allowing me to comment on my edits. The source is the website itself. The article listed a state party not listed on the website as well as an elected official that is not an AP official. There was a section removed that did not pertain- in fact it was about events that occurred before the party was formed. The positions listed and the Manifesto on the website lists progressive left positions as well as social media posts.To tell people that it is centrist is misleading. There is also new branding and messaging a new website. I was unable to change the logo. cf https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2021/05/alliance-party-may-2021-newsletter/

Faraday

Regarding my post about Faraday disproving modern theories about electrochemistry: I read it in his experimental research. Just don't remember where. Can I plead the 5th? I am innocent until proven guilty. Faraday stated in his research many things including that he did not think his "Law of Induction" was mathematical either. I am going to make another edit. Tell me what you think. My source is Faraday's experimental research...

K00la1dx (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Egyptian Cuisine

I did put a reference there to several cookbooks, however since I am myself Egyptian and am speaking with first hand knowledge it seemed silly. I did use the REF button it insert it. How do I make it so that it sticks.

when I put this in it has all these link things below it...….i dont know what that is....

Hi MS. An IP with a brief recent history of vandalism recently made edits to this article that I'm not confident in reverting as it's not as obvious as the others. Could you please take it over. Doug butler (talk) 06:04, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and Out. Doug butler (talk) 12:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion on Updater852

Why are you doing this? Updater852 (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) WP:NOTPROMO seems quite a good reason... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:21, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I created this External Link several months ago and have come back to edit it for brevity. Why are you reverting? Since it was my annotation to begin with, well... Updater852 (talk) 16:27, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't WP:OWN it. The annotation was long and clearly promoting a single work, so I've trimmed it. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 16:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weather pages on Brampton, Carlisle

Hi- I just updated the weather pages on Brampton, Carlisle to find them all now deleted !! - I own and operate the Met Office site, its all my own data and 100% correct, please contact me on pacrabtree@gmail to discuss please, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulACrabtree (talkcontribs) 19:13, October 19, 2021 (UTC)

Could you

remove talke page access for Special:Contributions/Sandra_Walsh193 as well (and perhaps delete the list)? Thanks and best wishes -- Johannnes89 (talk) 11:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Orchard Wikipedia

Because Andy Orchard is the subject of an AlJazeera broadcast, which has been posted to Wikipedia ( but who posted it?) and because his family are the subject of press harassment, I thought it appropriate to delete details of his family, whomI know personally, from the entry. Unless you know that he wants those details in this entry, may I suggest that it is a kindness to his wife and children, one of whom is autistic, to keep them out of the entry? With my best wishes,

Update for Peterborough Phantoms

I added up to date info on the club with link to page to prove it! Lukerees1988 (talk) 17:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

/* Arecibo answer */

Further links provided. http://proofofalien.com/decode-the-chilbolton-crop-circles-alien-messages/ https://www.alienhub.com/threads/alien-dna-molecule-in-cropcircle-2001.31009/

edit Nurdin Halid

hello, i am edit it page as it oridginal page in indonesian language you can look it in https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurdin_Halid thanks.

G5 and categories

Hi Materialscientist, you recently deleted Category:Trainspotting and Category:Turner & Hooch (franchise) by speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G5. However, the criterion states that G5 should not be applied to categories that may be useful, which I think is the case here. plicit 14:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, thanks, forgot about that. Materialscientist (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Typhoon Olga

Are you gonna finish moving the draft? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wind power

Wind power has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A

No why? Regina Gillies (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

H Agia Sophia corrections

Agia Sophia is not Hagia Sophia. H / O designate gender in Greek. So in English when translating Greek, it it is either O Agios / Agios or H Agia / Agia. This isn't simply disregarded as insignificant by the Greek speaking public. This is an extremely important notation, especially considering the relationship between these two civilizations / cultures. To dismiss this is reeks of something not becoming someone professing to hold a PhD. I'm not Greek, but have lived in both cultures - Greek & Turkish. My home country maintains alliances with the Turks and even I understand the significance of something like this and you dismiss it as " Not Constructive" - SERIOUSLY!? Looking forward to your reasoning. 139.138.210.165 (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

Please see this report Venkat TL (talk) 12:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock confirmation

Hi MS,

Since you don't see pings (I don't think @RickinBaltimore: is aware of that), just point you towards this unblock check Nosebagbear (talk) 13:19, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am NOW! :) Thanks for that and thank you MS for the comment on the page. I've unblocked the user RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Named accounts

Wondering why the two named accounts in this list weren't blocked? The one I reported is blatant, and the other one is still making unreferenced changes to articles despite about fourteen warnings not to do so. Seasider53 (talk) 15:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diamond

@Materialscientist: Greetings! I suggest that you kindly take a quick peek at your brilliant FA Diamond, as there have been quite a lot of edits such as this one: [1]. Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 20:56, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Akhil Bharatiya Poorva Sainik Seva Parishad. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walker Hayes

I added the Director of his latest music video after watching it on YouTube. Its basically in the credits of the video. Since you removed my edit, please feel free to re-add it yourself. I am not bothered to do it again.

Hello, see Guide to citing to learn how to cite, as your edit violates No Original Research MoonlightVectorTalk page 17:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about an editor

Hello and sorry to bother you. I stumbled across this new editor because they made a dubious-value change to a page I watch. I then looked at their other stuff and am left with a slight sense of unease. They might be a completely innocent editor who just isn't yet that skilled, of course; but I also worry that they may be gaming the system in some way ... it just doesn't quite add up for me but then I am not Sherlock Holmes. If you had a moment to have a look, please, I would be most grateful. But maybe there is nothing to worry about? Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: well OK not that new, but the current orgy of strange minor edits dates from only a few days ago. Also, if they are not up to something bad, are they in a speed-editing competition or something? It's an amazing rate of minor-edit output – they are going faster than I can read them! Oh well, ho hum, thanks DBaK (talk) 20:51, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I hadn't seen that coming! Thanks, and best wishes DBaK (talk) 18:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist. The IP range did the same pattern as a blocked user Lunga de Bacurau (talk · contribs). Can you please range block the IP range. 183.171.114.88 (talk) 02:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

183.171.114.88, Regarding 191.37.217.0/22 Range I'm 100% Certain that Ip's (191.37.217.0/22 Range) cannot be blocked indefinitely, block length depends on the admin and regarding 191.37.217.0/22 take it to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism board and report the ip range, that is the only way the ip can be blocked. Chip3004 (talk) 03:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block modification request

Thank you for blocking 37.19.51.201, the IP address that kept removing the sandbox heading and adding nobots template. But, can you please revoke their talk page access too? They are trying to remove warnings. RainbowLover334148 (talk) 03:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @RainbowLover334148: Users are allowed to remove most warnings from their own talk page. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not find any reliable reference on Derivative and Commodity Exchange Nepal Ltd., thus i had tagged it for deletion. Perhaps, you may have some offline resources that may have caused to remove the tag. Meanwhile, I have tagged it for AfD. Would you wish, please take part in the discussion. Regards! nirmal (talk) 08:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Your Question

I Make Change in Shamb because i Read it in Mahabharata that Sambh Chief Consert was Laxmana Duryodhana daughter So First you check it Benrgoyal3107 (talk) 10:00, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Piano Quintet

I was only trying to restructure the article since it is in its present form a p*** in the a*** to work with. Sort the works by composers, alphabetically, instead of first by centuries, than by composers. (The century thing is not a great idea because people can live and write music in two centuries, and the part for after 1900 is extremely long and unpractical, not to mention that you end up scrolling in the wrong century when looking for a work.) Sorry for not explaining every single step on the way, if you had given me half an hour, I had finished the whole thing.

I feel like that block was way too hasty and quick. The user made 1 (one!!) vandalism edit, and has two (2!!) filter log hits. That's hardly sufficient to justify an indefinite block IMHO, especially since they had only been given one warning (by me, via {{welcomevandal}}). Taking Out The Trash (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) – I felt that this was a perfectly appropriate block. The user had made it abundantly clear that they were WP:NOTHERE. To be honest, I quite often wish we were quicker blocking vandals. We don't have to be too nice. Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 18:45, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hand-to-hand combat and martial artist

Thanks for your revert on Ronan - that same IP added that to many different articles and I didn't know if I should do a mass revert. 98.32.219.40 (talk) 01:51, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A pie for you!

Just because! Bobherry Talk Edits 17:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of the CSD request, but the intention was to have User:User:Ahecht/Sandbox5 deleted, not just the talk page. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 15:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

María Fernanda Espinosa

Assertions regarding alleged controversies surrounding María Fernanda Espinosa's PhD studies have a political origin of attack and persecution that are neither acceptable nor compatible in Wikipedia as an open and public encyclopedia. Ms. Espinosa's experience as an international public figure is not exposed in its magnitude and is intentionally affected with a disproportionate section on the deleted topic.

Mrs. Espinosa always stated in her professional life that she had completed doctoral studies or that she was a PhD candidate. Due to the multiple functions inherent to her public positions, on two occasions, when she was appointed Minister of Defense and then Permanent Representative of Ecuador to the United Nations in New York, it was made the mistake of stating that she had a PhD from Rutgers University in official press releases, under the responsibility of communication and protocol teams. At no time is there a proven attitude that Espinosa promoted an academic fraud or that she pretended to attribute a degree without obtaining it. There has never been any controversy or scandal surrounding the issue and its publication can only be a deliberate act to affect her image and reputation which is not acceptable and which we will appeal legally. When Ms. Espinosa was elected as president of the UN General Assembly, attacks, and political persecution against her increased in Ecuador, since it was considered that she intended to be a candidate for the presidency of the republic in that country. The attacks were directed by former president Rafael Correa and by other political groups in Ecuador with the intention of neutralizing her politically, and the purpose of affecting and tarnishing her reputation and international performance.

Smiljanic family

Smiljanic family was a ortodox family in dalmatia in 17 century, all Smiljanic was a serb entity. https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%A1%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%99%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%9B

Please help

How i see,the Croation propaganda, try to change and destroy all Serb indetity from Dalmatia and all today Croatia( Dalmatia never was a Croatia to 1939, you can check that... Smiljanic, Jankovic, Mitrovic ,all Morlach and Wlach are only Serbs in all history books from 16,17,18.century....

[1] [2]

Identity Politics Lack of NPOV

It was not a mistake, and I explained my reasons why in the talk page, the definition of Identity Politics was not sourced from an academic journal, but articles on socialist websites and the website of Berkeley University. Furthermore, the tone of the article was as if Wikipedia itself was stating these to be true, and not from a neutral tone, describing the sources and their viewpoint. Chantern15 (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

I believe we have come to an understanding on the talk page. Thank you.Chantern15 (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]
I'm not sure who added the links about serbs, maybe it carried over from below, which is surprising since reflist is here.Chantern15 (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)chantern15[reply]

[3]

Bizarre block duration

What the heck is this block duration? That's really bizarre. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do I add a source?

You said I have to add a source when I added myself on my husbands page. Hakeem Oluseyi. How do i do that!? Jeasicarutter (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contest speedy deletion of Frame.io

This article was deleted before I had a chance to respond to the speedy deletion nomination for Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7, which I believe is incorrect and meets several criteria for Wikipedia:Notability.

-Shivertimbers433 (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bryophyte

Hi! Would you be able to restore Talk:Bryophyte? Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 23:58, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I wish you actually read the edits I worked on for the Bahaghari page before reverting everything and just tagging it as vandalism within seconds. I worked for several hours straight for it.

Makibeki (talk) 15:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC) Makibeki[reply]

On overwriting the Bahaghari page

Thank you for getting back to me. I actually sent for review a separate article for the Bahaghari film, as the page itself is an unsourced one-line stub and I believe it doesn't merit hogging the more popular use of the word.