Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Fables characters (Thirteenth Floor Fables)
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Fables characters (Thirteenth Floor Fables) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Waste of time AfD due to someone who clearly cannot read. Duplicative content of List of Fables characters that is not a justified split. TTN (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:16, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Duplicative of List of Fables characters#Thirteenth Floor Fables, and no sources whatsoever on this subset of the characters that would justify a needed split into a separate article. As the content is not only unsourced, but exactly the same, merging is not needed, and as this is not a particularly plausible search term, a Redirect would not be helpful. Rorshacma (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- If it were down to me, I would just delete List of Fables characters as a pile of cruft. but that is just my opinion. I am not sure why the there is a slightly uncivil tone to the deletion rationale. The article was still prodded when I looked just now. It is deprodded because I don't think it should have been prodded. We are just having a difference of opinion. When I split the article 7 years ago and created this article then I did it properly and it was not a duplicate. That was done by someone botching a reverse of the split. Being a duplicate is not by itself a reason for deleting the article, it can be solved by editing. If we cannot do my preferred idea of getting rid of List of Fables characters entirely then I think the article should have the deleted sections removed and replaced with redirects to this article like I did in the first place. Op47 (talk) 14:26, 25 April 2021 (UTC)