User:Dgarq
 | This account is a suspected sockpuppet of G.-M. Cupertino (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
The article Publius Helvidius Priscus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Low notability; inherent neutrality problems when the only source is dedicated to using this topic to prove a wider (and rather eccentric) point
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bobrayner (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Gaius Helvidius Priscus (consul suffectus 87) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Low notability; inherent neutrality problems when the only source is dedicated to using this topic to prove a wider (and rather eccentric) point
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bobrayner (talk) 11:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)