User talk:Kungfuadam: Difference between revisions

; Archives
	Archive 1; Archive 2; Archive 3; Archive 4; Archive 5; Archive 6; Archive 7; Archive 8; Archive 9; Archive 10; Archive 11;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:54, 2 January 2007

User:Kungfuadam/Status

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than (7) days are automatically archived to User talk:Kungfuadam/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

I will respond to messages here so please temporarily put my talk page on your watch list. This will prevent discombobulation of messages.

How do I view an article that got deleted

Hi,

I noticed that you deleted an article on performance transparency [1]]

Is there any way to see the deleted article, the purge function seems not to work. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards Ed.

Padmavati

Why are my changes being reverted?

Saddam Hussein article

nothing wrong with my edit Rossinicholas 03:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BKWSU

Can you please explain the speedy deletion of the BKWSU pages?

You state "(copyvio [2])"

Noting your use of the copyvio|URL tag. Can you please establish what evidence you used, or have been given, to support the parties claim of ownership? The topic content is clearly referenced to academic papers.

Thank you. Bkwsu proposal page 03:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a blatant copy and paste from this website. Also, Wikipedia is not a place to post original research. Wikipedia's copyright policy prohibits copying and pasting from websites, even if it is your own. Wikipedia is not a mirror.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How or where were you alerted about this? What point of view are you coming from?

I ask this because another contributor, an active BKWSU member, has been engaging in editwarring and has been using a number tricks to try and block my contributions, e.g. sockpuppet accounts to places blocks and lock article, bogus vandalism charges. I agree that a some of the article was cruft. It was actually a sandbox to try and resolve issues.

I am concerned that you have willfuly misled and that this individual is still up to his tricks.

Bkwsu proposal page 01:15, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adam, I'd like to quote Wikipedia:Request_for_immediate_removal_of_copyright_violation

Important notes

Facts cannot be copyrighted, only their expression. [One] cannot claim copyright on some Wikipedia article just because it happens to cite the same facts as a text or page that [one] wrote; [one] may only claim if the text in the article was lifted from [one's] work.' This is not policy, it is the law.

Now, excuse me but this page was in no imaginable way "blatant copy and paste", original research or mirroring, so can we please resolve this matter? What went on here, how were you alerted to such a specific item?

Thank you. 195.82.106.244 06:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toyota template

Mr Kung-fu Adam

I am wanting to create a bottom of the page template for Toyota cars, like ones for US states. where one can click any other state on the template, instead of going down to the Category page for US states. How is this done? Angry Aspie 16:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go to User:Kungfuadam/Template:Toyota cars and edit it to your liking. I took this from another Toyota template. When you are ready to make it live, let me know, and I will move it to the Template space. You can go ahead and edit this template to make it appropriate to what you need.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 18:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot. I have edited the template & it's ready to go up. Angry Aspie 19:19, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO- can you please fix the auto generation infobox on the Toyota Camry Hybrid page? Angry Aspie 19:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took it out because I don't know how to fix it. You can fiddle with it in the history of the page.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 23:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

White people

Dear Kungfuadam, see the discussion page before you revert things. You seem to have no problems with contributions like Wog, in the Australias section of the article. Is there some kind of double standard here? Veritas et Severitas 22:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan: Talk

You had recently erased my talk contribution under Trying "too hard". It has valid points countering some claims made by Pakistani Knight. Please specify the reasons for doing so and if there are any rule breaches,what acceptable form it may be submitted in. 59.183.18.64 22:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)Vader1941[reply]

Dani Wassner

Why was the "Dani Wassner" page deleted? I posted to the talk page reasons it should stay.

Bslistquestion 15:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC) BSlist[reply]

BreadFish deletion

Hey there!

I noticed you cited csd g11 as the reason for the deletion of the BreadFish page. I'm curious as to what qualified the page for deletion given that the pages for related subjects - Fusebox, Mach-II, and Tartan - remain.

I'm also curious as to what criteria the stub for Tartan (a page composed entirely of two sentences: "The Tartan Framework is a 'command-driven' service framework for ColdFusion. It was developed by Paul Kenney.") meets that the page for BreadFish did not.

If the article needs to be rewritten to become more encyclopedic, please don't hesitate to let me know.

Thanks!

-- Russlebo 17:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I restored it, but someone else might nominate it for deletion.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 19:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great! If you could let me know a bit about what exactly is questionable or direct me to a good resource, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.-- Russlebo 19:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Olsen

Can you not delete my article about Greg Olsen the football player.--Bucs10 20:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Bucs10[reply]

Thanks

thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage... it's been a while. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 75: / Line 75: @@
 :::''Important notes''
-:::'''''Facts cannot be copyrighted, only their expression'''. [One] cannot claim copyright on some Wikipedia article just because it happens to cite the same facts as a text or page that [one] wrote; [one] may only claim if the text in the article was lifted from [one's] work.''' This is not policy, it is the law.
+:::'''''Facts cannot be copyrighted, only their expression'''''. ''[One] cannot claim copyright on some Wikipedia article just because it happens to cite the same facts as a text or page that [one] wrote; [one] may only claim if the text in the article was lifted from [one's] work.''' This is not policy, it is the law.
 :::Now, excuse me but this page was in no imaginable way "blatant copy and paste", original research or mirroring, so can we please resolve this matter? What went on here, how were you alerted to such a specific item?