User talk:KhanQadriRazvi

Welcome

Hello, KhanQadriRazvi, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:KhanQadriRazvi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:KhanQadriRazvi/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, KhanQadriRazvi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa, from its old location at User:KhanQadriRazvi/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style guideline about Islamic honorifics that should be followed to maintain a neutral point of view and consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style by adding honorifics, as you did in Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa, disturbs uniformity among articles and should only be done with a special reason. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sagotreespirit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 13:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hi KhanQadriRazvi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Barelvi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:25, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Grand Mufti of India, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. In addition to being unsummarised the edit was marked as WP:MINOR. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Template:Z33

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Asjad Raza Khan while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. It is fairly obvious that this edit,[1] was by you. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Asjad Raza Khan, you may be blocked from editing. If you believe the article has the wrong name, and that all reliable sources refer to him by the wrong name, you should raise this on the article talk page.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Please stop you marking your edits as minor, when you are adding new links to articles at Template:Barelvi.[2][3] You have been told about this before. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Faizan E Tajush Shariah Foundation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Faizan E Tajush Shariah Foundation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:36, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KhanQadriRazvi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Faizan E Tajush Shariah Foundation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!^{Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS).} 05:18, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi KhanQadriRazvi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, how to write, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mufti Zia ul Mustafa Azami Qadri Amjadi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mufti Zia ul Mustafa Azami Qadri Amjadi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Salaam. You are doing good work. An article dedicated to Allama Ziaul Mustafa sahab is really required. ScholarM (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, But it’s very hard to gather information from net, because Barelvi Ulemas are strict follower of Shariat, so newspaper are writing article about them in very very less amount, that the reason we are not getting any newspaper article about them, and Wikipedia not accepting the book which is written about them, I don't no why, we know about Barelvi ulemas only from one source that is book which is written about them, but Wikipedia want newspaper link mostly which is very difficult to find.KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 03:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)To be very clear my best understanding is, offline verifiable book resources, if independently published, and acceptable, links do not need to be online. Many resources for the honorable Irish steam locomotives I write are for offline books, and have survived WP:AFDs with those WP:RS. That said pragmatically such books/offline need to be fully available to all and on the [4] site with an oclc= or have a isbn number. They also much not be self published. And can be other issues. Read and re-read Wikipedia:Notability, WP:RS, WP:V and the excellent WP:THREE. Now to be very clear while I commend ScholarM's words of encouragement I am very concerned given the state and quantity of stuff both of you are having rejected or otherwise giving problems under a topic area that is under discretionary sanctions. Should the problem rate continue it will indicate either you have a lack of WP:COMPETENCY to contribute the English Wikipedia or are being disruptive. For example if you regularly put articles to mainspace that are rejected without going via WP:AFC then I personally would be see that as disruptive and should ultimately lead to blocking. Please indicate a full citation of the book you have having problems with using Template:Cite book or otherwise and I'll try to give a (non-authoritative) opinion on it. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Qadri Razvi, as told by Djm-leighpark there is no need of news paper articles always. You can cite offline books with ISBN numbers from independent publishers are also enough. For Example- Book by Imam Ahmed Raza Academy South Africa Durban or From Farid Book Depo etc. The lnaguage is also not a bar. Please read again Wikipedia:Notability, WP:RS, WP:V. Hope you can improve Wikipedia articles for readers. ScholarM (talk) 10:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

please go through this links

1. https://ur.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B6%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%A1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B7%D9%81%D9%B0%DB%8C
2. https://pnb.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B6%DB%8C%D8%A7%D8%A1_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B7%D9%81%D9%B0%DB%8C
3. https://archive.org/details/the-chain-of-light-vol.-2/page/230/mode/2up
4. http://alihya.org.uk/the-sword-of-raza-muhaddith-e-kabeer/
5. https://www.themuslim500.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/TheMuslim500-2016-low.pdf (page no- 118)
6. https://www.jagran.com/news/national-asaduddin-owaisi-ar-rahman-among-worlds-top-500-most-influential-muslims-12987869.html

thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

These are not enough RS. You need to find urdu and Arabic articles/books written about him if the material is not available in English. The content must be neutral through third party source. ScholarM (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft, as you have been told before. Your article title is incorrect, it shouldn't include honorifics or title, like "mufti". I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the subject or his organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what he claims or interviewing him. Your text didn't have a single ref, and if we can't confirm what you say from independent third-party sources, he can't meet our notability criteria, and the article won't survive. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: the blessed home... famous all over the world by the same name... chose him as one of his blessed students and gave him very special attention, teaching him and instructing him with complete attention... His students reside all over the world... a list was compiled which reached over 30’000 students... Every year Allama Sahib is invited to over 30 institutes... and so on, it's a fan page, not an encyclopaedia article.
• the article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, even in translation, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial and text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. I didn't check for copyright since it was such obvious promo
• If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. Also, if you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:KhanQadriRazvi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=KhanQadriRazvi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Respond

Neither am I an employee of anyone, nor I am a paid user, I write this article because I think people should know about them, because Barelvi Ulemas are strict follower of Shariat, No news papers want to write articles about them, or write such small amounts, that no one knows that there is an article about them in newspaper. That is why we do not find any article about them in any newspaper. This is the reason that people does not find any article in the newspaper about them and people does not know them, I write what I want to write from books which are not available to everyone because its nots published by any famous publisher, Or it could be don't want to read such a thick and big book, This is my reason for writing an article in Wikipedia, that people should know about them in less time, yes there may be some grammertical mistakes in my article that you can correct it. KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 08:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

I believe this is a reasonable statement of claim of no conflict of interest. However I am concerned you recent edits and comments to Akhtar Raza Khan may indicate a non-neutral approach to editing.Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020 (2)

Your recent editing history at Akhtar Raza Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
In addition to to WP:3RR that page is also under discretionary sanctions. Please note as far as I can tell, and I am not authoritative, the image you have been repeatedly removing is acceptable under Wikipedia:Non-free content and should not have be removed from the article on that basis. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

     I, am feeling very angry after seeing the image of Akhtar Raza Khan  in the article, how can someone share the image of my spiritual father? Without any permission. If I, uploaded your father pic in anywhere which you not want to share,  if I, uploaded it then how you feel that time after seeing that image on that place. KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

• Please note also that Wikipedia is not censored. We do not leave out photographs or other images of subjects just because of religious taboos. That said, there is wrapper code that can be put around certain images so that users who wish to observe Islamic imagery taboos may opt out of seeing them. Please reply here if you would like me to see if that code can be added to the image of Akhtar Raza Khan. —C.Fred (talk) 16:13, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

   I, want is that no one get his image through the Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is easily available for all, yes if you can hide the image, so no one can get easily  his (Akhtar Raza Khan) image, then you can hide it. Thanks  KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at File:AkhtarRazaKhan(Image).jpg. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:48, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your seemingly disruptive editing. The thread is Possible chronic and intractable behavioral problem. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss it. I have no problem with the discussion. I would like to clarify on this. I'm fine, I don't have any problem. I am a person of calm behaviour, yes I, having some objection regarding the picture of Akhtar Raza Khan, without permission of concerning person, how can you upload someone picture. Now let's talk about Grand Mufti of India, Within two person Wikipedia (according to article) has accepted one person as Grand Mufti of India and left another person, Which is not looking fair, though newspaper write both of them, So, I, just suggested that Article where both person name is written as a Grand Mufti of India.Yes, I am accepting that might be my article tone is not a neutral, It will take some time how to write a neutral article. but I will learn. Thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Regarding the image: it is not Wikipedia's policy to ask permission before obtaining an image. It's better if the image is under a free license, but there are certain circumstances when a non-free image is acceptable. One of them is in the biography of a deceased person, when it is no longer possible to take a new, free picture of them. —C.Fred (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Even if he was alive, he will never gave a photo.Because photography is Forbidden (Haram) in Islam, He followed it strictly. That is why I, am speaking to remove his photo, I don't know why you guys don't understanding that. KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not censored. We do not omit pictures or any other information because of a religious taboo. (Remember, if we did, it would be forbidden to spell out the name of All*h, because it is forbidden (Chillul Hashem) to desecrate the name of G*d, and to allow His name written out to be deleted when the screen is redrawn is deemed a desecration.)

That being said, the fact that he did not allow photos limits the possibility of obtaining a free photo—and actually makes it easier to use a non-free image under the non-free content criteria. —C.Fred (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

In Wikipedia many articles are without a picture, if this article will be without a picture then what is the problem? is photo necessary for the article?, if it is necessary, then delete all the articles that which are without the picture. And one thing I, am not saying to remove the picture of everyone, the person who consider that photography is forbidden (Haram) and does not allowing to click the photo, then don't upload picture of that person, For example, many Sunni Ullama clicking pictures of themselves, so I, am not asking to remove their picture because they are clicking picture themselves, who are against the photography please don't upload their pictures, I, hope that maybe I explained my point to you.Thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Zia ul Mustafa

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Zia ul Mustafa has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/details/the-chain-of-light-vol.-2/page/230/mode/2up. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review —C.Fred (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

You deleted the page, I, don't have any problem regarding deletion of page, I will write again, and I will try to write article in neutral tone next time.Thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 05:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamat Raza-E-Mustafa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Global and Active (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, KhanQadriRazvi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Jama'at Raza-e-Mustafa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Editing based on 'orders from the head office' is almost a dictionary definition of a conflict of interest, regardless of whether you are being paid or not. You should disclose - on your user page what your connection is with your subject(s) and refrain from editing (or moving) the article directly. Propose changes on the talk page.

You don't have to use one of the templates on your user page. It would be sufficient to make a simple statement in your own words about your relationship to your subject. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

I, already explained, that "Neither am I an employee of anyone, nor I am a paid user" Now question is about mine relation with subject and 'Editing based on' "orders from the head office"

Answer : I'm the member of this organisation, and I didn't say anytime that "head office order me to write article about organisation" I said this "head office using this spelling" so there is much difference between both statement. Thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 04:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

While these disclosures ought to go on your user page, your declaration here should be sufficient. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm not interested for doing this. Thanks KhanQadriRazvi (talk) 04:18, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Mahanama Aala Hazrat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mahanama Aala Hazrat, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 06:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jamat Raza -E- Mustafa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)