Gyrator–capacitor model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:17, 6 October 2019

The gyrator–capacitor model^[1] is a lumped-element model for magnetic fields, similar to magnetic circuits, but based on using elements analogous to capacitors (see magnetic capacitance) rather than elements analogous to resistors (see magnetic reluctance) to represent the magnetic flux path. Windings are represented as gyrators, interfacing between the electrical circuit and the magnetic model.

The primary advantage of the gyrator–capacitor model compared to the magnetic reluctance model is that the model preserves the correct values of energy flow, storage and dissipation. The gyrator–capacitor model is an example of a group of analogies that preserve energy flow across energy domains by making power conjugate pairs of variables in the various domains analogous.

Summary of analogy between magnetic circuits and electrical circuits

The following table summarizes the mathematical analogy between electrical circuit theory and magnetic circuit theory.

Analogy between 'magnetic circuits' and electrical circuits
Magnetic			Electric
Name	Symbol	Units	Name	Symbol	Units
Magnetomotive force (MMF)	${\mathcal {F}}=\int \mathbf {H} \cdot \operatorname {d} \mathbf {l}$	ampere-turn	Electromotive force (EMF)	${\mathcal {E}}=\int \mathbf {E} \cdot \operatorname {d} \mathbf {l}$	volt
Magnetic field	H	ampere/meter = newton/weber	Electric field	E	volt/meter = newton/coulomb
Magnetic flux	$\Phi$	weber	Electric charge	Q	Coulomb
Flux rate of change	${\dot {\Phi }}$	weber/second = volt	Electric current	${\mathcal {}}I$	coulomb/second =ampere
Magnetic admittance	${\mathcal {}}Y_{M}(\omega )={\frac {{\dot {\Phi }}(\omega )}{{\mathcal {F}}(\omega )}}$	ohm	Admittance	${\mathcal {}}Y_{E}(\omega )={\frac {I(\omega )}{V(\omega )}}$	1/ohm = mho = siemens
Magnetic conductance	$G_{M}=\operatorname {Re} (Y_{M}(\omega ))$	ohm	Electric conductance	$G_{E}=\operatorname {Re} (Y_{E}(\omega ))$	1/ohm = mho = siemens
Permeance	${\mathcal {P}}={\frac {\operatorname {Im} (Y_{E}(\omega ))}{\omega }}$	Henry	Capacitance	$C={\frac {\operatorname {Im} (Y_{E}(\omega ))}{\omega }}$	Farad

Magnetic impedance

Magnetic complex impedance

Magnetic complex impedance is equal to the relationship of the complex effective or amplitude value of a sinusoidal magnetic tension on the passive magnetic circuit or its element, and accordingly the complex effective or amplitude value of a sinusoidal magnetic current in this circuit or in this element.

Magnetic complex impedance [1, 2] is measured in units – [ ${\frac {1}{\Omega }}$ ] and determined by the formula:

$Z_{M}={\frac {\dot {N}}{{\dot {I}}_{M}}}={\frac {{\dot {N}}_{m}}{{\dot {I}}_{M}m}}=z_{M}e^{j\phi }$

where $z_{M}={\frac {N}{I_{M}}}={\frac {N_{m}}{I_{Mm}}}$ is the relationship of the effective or amplitude value of a magnetic tension and accordingly of the effective or amplitude magnetic current is called full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance). The full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance) is equal to the modulus of the complex magnetic impedance. The argument of a complex magnetic impedance is equal to the difference of the phases of the magnetic tension and magnetic current $\phi =\beta -\alpha$ . Complex magnetic impedance can be presented in following form:

$Z_{M}=z_{M}e^{j\phi }=z_{M}\cos \phi +jz_{M}\sin \phi =r_{M}+jx_{M}$

where $r_{M}=z_{M}\cos \phi$ is the real part of the complex magnetic impedance, called the effective magnetic resistance; $x_{M}=z_{M}\sin \phi$ is the imaginary part of the complex magnetic impedance, called the reactive magnetic resistance. The full magnetic resistance (magnetic impedance) is equal

$z_{M}={\sqrt {r_{M}^{2}+x_{M}^{2}}}$ , $\phi =\arctan {\frac {x_{M}}{r_{M}}}$

Magnetic impedance (SI unit: Ω⁻¹) is the ratio of a sinusoidal magnetomotive force ${\mathcal {F}}$ to a sinusoidal magnetic current ${\dot {\Phi }}$ in a gyrator–capacitor model. Analogous to electrical impedance, magnetic impedance is likewise a complex variable.

Z_{\mathrm {M} }={\frac {\mathcal {F}}{\dot {\Phi }}}

Magnetic impedance is also called the full magnetic resistance. It is derived from:

r_{\mathrm {M} }=z_{\mathrm {M} }\cos \phi

, the effective magnetic resistance (real)

x_{\mathrm {M} }=z_{\mathrm {M} }\sin \phi

, the reactive magnetic resistance (imaginary)

The phase angle $\phi$ of the magnetic impedance is equal to:

\phi =\arctan {\frac {x_{\mathrm {M} }}{r_{\mathrm {M} }}}

Magnetic effective resistance

Magnetic effective resistance (SI unit: Ω⁻¹) is the real component of complex magnetic impedance. This causes a magnetic circuit to lose magnetic potential energy.^[2]^[3] Active power in a magnetic circuit equals the product of magnetic effective resistance $r_{\mathrm {M} }$ and magnetic current squared $I_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}$ .

$P=r_{\mathrm {M} }I_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}$

The magnetic effective resistance on a complex plane appears as the side of the resistance triangle for magnetic circuit of an alternating current. The effective magnetic resistance is bounding with the effective magnetic conductance $g_{\mathrm {M} }$ by the expression

g_{\mathrm {M} }={\frac {r_{\mathrm {M} }}{z_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}}}

where $z_{\mathrm {M} }$ is the full magnetic impedance of a magnetic circuit.

Active power in a magnetic circuit equals the product of magnetic effective resistance $r_{\mathrm {M} }$ and magnetic current squared $I_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}$ .

$P=r_{\mathrm {M} }I_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}$

The magnetic effective resistance on a complex plane appears as the side of the resistance triangle for magnetic circuit of an alternating current. The effective magnetic resistance is bounding with the effective magnetic conductance $g_{\mathrm {M} }$ by the expression

g_{\mathrm {M} }={\frac {r_{\mathrm {M} }}{z_{\mathrm {M} }^{2}}}

where $z_{\mathrm {M} }$ is the full magnetic impedance of a magnetic circuit.

Magnetic reactance

Magnetic reactance is the parameter of a passive magnetic circuit or an element of the circuit, which is equal to the square root of the difference of squares of the magnetic complex impedance and magnetic effective resistance to a magnetic current, taken with the sign plus, if the magnetic current lags behind the magnetic tension in phase, and with the sign minus, if the magnetic current leads the magnetic tension in phase.

Magnetic reactance ^[2]^[4]^[3] is the component of magnetic complex impedance of the alternating current circuit, which produces the phase shift between a magnetic current and magnetic tension in the circuit. It is measured in units of ${\tfrac {1}{\Omega }}$ and is denoted by $x$ (or $X$ ). It may be inductive $x_{L}=\omega L_{M}$ or capacitive $x_{C}={\tfrac {1}{\omega C_{M}}}$ , where $\omega$ is the angular frequency of a magnetic current, $L_{M}$ is the magnetic inductivity of a circuit, $C_{M}$ is the magnetic capacitivity of a circuit. The magnetic reactance of an undeveloped circuit with the inductivity and the capacitivity, which are connected in series, is equal: $x=x_{L}-x_{C}=\omega L_{M}-{\frac {1}{\omega C_{M}}}$ . If $x_{L}=x_{C}$ , then the net reactance $x=0$ and resonance takes place in the circuit. In the general case $x={\sqrt {z^{2}-r^{2}}}$ . When an energy loss is absent ( $r=0$ ), $x=z$ . The angle of the phase shift in a magnetic circuit $\phi =\arctan {\frac {x}{r}}$ . On a complex plane, the magnetic reactance appears as the side of the resistance triangle for circuit of an alternating current.

Magnetic capacitivity

Magnetic capacitivity (SI unit: H), denoted as $C_{\mathrm {M} }$ , is an extensive property and is defined as:

$C_{\mathrm {M} }=\mu _{\mathrm {r} }\mu _{0}{\frac {S}{l}}$

Where: $\mu _{\mathrm {r} }\mu _{0}=\mu$ is the magnetic permeability, $S$ is the element cross-section, and $l$ is the element length.

For phasor analysis, the magnetic permeability^[5] and the magnetic capacitivity are complex values.^[5]^[4]

Magnetic capacitivity is also equal to magnetic flux divided by the difference of magnetic potential across the element.

$C_{\mathrm {M} }={\frac {\Phi }{\phi _{\mathrm {M1} }-\phi _{\mathrm {M2} }}}$

Where:

\phi _{\mathrm {M1} }-\phi _{\mathrm {M2} }

is the difference of the magnetic potentials.

The notion of magnetic capacitivity is employed in the gyrator–capacitor model in a way analogous to capacitance in electrical circuits.

Magnetic inductance

In a magnetic circuit, magnetic inductance (inductive magnetic reactance) is the analogy to inductance in an electrical circuit. In the SI system, it is measured in units of -Ω⁻¹. This model makes magnetomotive force (mmf) the analog of electromotive force in electrical circuits, and time rate of change of magnetic flux the analog of electric current.

For phasor analysis the magnetic inductive reactance is:

x_{\mathrm {L} }=\omega L_{\mathrm {M} }

Where:

L_{\mathrm {M} }

is the magnetic inductivity (SI unit: s·Ω⁻¹)

\omega

is the angular frequency of the magnetic circuit

In the complex form it is a positive imaginary number:

jx_{\mathrm {L} }=j\omega L_{\mathrm {M} }

The magnetic potential energy sustained by magnetic inductivity varies with the frequency of oscillations in electric fields. The average power in a given period is equal to zero. Due to its dependence on frequency, magnetic inductance is mainly observable in magnetic circuits which operate at VHF and/or UHF frequencies.

The notion of magnetic inductivity is employed in analysis and computation of circuit behavior in the gyrator–capacitor model in a way analogous to inductance in electrical circuits.

References

^ D.C. Hamill (1993). "Lumped equivalent circuits of magnetic components: the gyrator-capacitor approach". IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 8 (2): 97–103. Bibcode:1993ITPE....8...97H. doi:10.1109/63.223957.
^ ^a ^b Pohl, R. W. (1960). Elektrizitätslehre (in German). Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
^ ^a ^b Küpfmüller K. Einführung in die theoretische Elektrotechnik, Springer-Verlag, 1959.
^ ^a ^b Popov, V. P. (1985). The Principles of Theory of Circuits (in Russian). M.: Higher School.
^ ^a ^b Arkadiew W. Eine Theorie des elektromagnetischen Feldes in den ferromagnetischen Metallen. – Phys. Zs., H. 14, No 19, 1913, S. 928-934.

[1] D.C. Hamill (1993). "Lumped equivalent circuits of magnetic components: the gyrator-capacitor approach". IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 8 (2): 97–103. Bibcode:1993ITPE....8...97H. doi:10.1109/63.223957.

[Pohl-2] Pohl, R. W. (1960). Elektrizitätslehre (in German). Berlin-Gottingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

[Küpfmüller-3] Küpfmüller K. Einführung in die theoretische Elektrotechnik, Springer-Verlag, 1959.

[Popov-4] Popov, V. P. (1985). The Principles of Theory of Circuits (in Russian). M.: Higher School.

[Arkadiew-5] Arkadiew W. Eine Theorie des elektromagnetischen Feldes in den ferromagnetischen Metallen. – Phys. Zs., H. 14, No 19, 1913, S. 928-934.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 |[[ampere|coulomb/second =ampere]]
 |-
+|Magnetic admittance
-|
 |<math>\mathcal {}Y_M(\omega)=\frac{\dot \Phi(\omega)}{\mathcal{F}(\omega)} </math>
 |[[ohm]]
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 |1/[[ohm]] = [[mho]] = [[siemens (unit)|siemens]]
 |-
+|Magnetic conductance
-|
+|<math>G_M =  \operatorname{Re}(Y_M(\omega))</math>
-|
+|[[ohm]]
-|
 |
 |[[Electric conductance]]
 |<math>G_E =  \operatorname{Re}(Y_E(\omega))</math>
+|1/[[ohm]] = [[mho]] = [[siemens (unit)|siemens]]
-|
-|-
-|
-|
-|
-|
-|
-|<math>B_E =  \operatorname{Im}(Y_E(\omega))</math>
-|
 |-
-|[[Permeance]]||<math> \mathcal{P} = \frac{\mathrm{d}\Phi}{\mathrm{d}\mathcal{F}}</math>||[[Henry (unit)|henry]]||  ||[[Capacitance]]||<math>C_E =  \frac{\operatorname{Im}(Y_E(\omega))}{\omega}</math>
+|[[Permeance]]||<math>\mathcal{P} =  \frac{\operatorname{Im}(Y_E(\omega))}{\omega}</math>||[[Henry (unit)|Henry]]||  ||[[Capacitance]]||<math>C =  \frac{\operatorname{Im}(Y_E(\omega))}{\omega}</math>
 |[[Farad]]
 |}