Jump to content

Talk:William Rowan Hamilton: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
VWA (talk | contribs)
119 edits
→Quaternions: new section
Ordy823 (talk | contribs)
11 edits
No edit summary
Line 91: Line 91:


In the article [[Quaternion]] it is stated about [[Olinde Rodrigues]] and the discovery of the quaternions: "Important precursors to this work included Euler's four-square identity (1748) and Olinde Rodrigues' parameterization of general rotations by four parameters (1840), but neither of these writers treated the four-parameter rotations as an algebra.[7][8] Carl Friedrich Gauss had also discovered quaternions in 1819, but this work was not published until 1900.[9][10]" That seems to me much more nuanced than the remark in this article: "The other great contribution Hamilton made to mathematical science was his discovery of quaternions in 1843.[12] However, in 1840, Benjamin Olinde Rodrigues had already reached a result that amounted to their discovery in all but name.[13]" Since I am not a mathematician I will not alter the text, but give the comparison for consideration. [[User:VWA|VWA]] ([[User talk:VWA|talk]]) 12:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
In the article [[Quaternion]] it is stated about [[Olinde Rodrigues]] and the discovery of the quaternions: "Important precursors to this work included Euler's four-square identity (1748) and Olinde Rodrigues' parameterization of general rotations by four parameters (1840), but neither of these writers treated the four-parameter rotations as an algebra.[7][8] Carl Friedrich Gauss had also discovered quaternions in 1819, but this work was not published until 1900.[9][10]" That seems to me much more nuanced than the remark in this article: "The other great contribution Hamilton made to mathematical science was his discovery of quaternions in 1843.[12] However, in 1840, Benjamin Olinde Rodrigues had already reached a result that amounted to their discovery in all but name.[13]" Since I am not a mathematician I will not alter the text, but give the comparison for consideration. [[User:VWA|VWA]] ([[User talk:VWA|talk]]) 12:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

===
Hello,

Apologies, as I don't understand how to edit wiki talk articles, but I wanted to add my opinion here.

I was reading the "Personal Life" section, and I read this: "Hamilton's married life turned out to be difficult and unhappy as Bayly proved to be pious, shy, timid, and chronically ill."

My own personal feelings is that this too subjective to be in an encyclopedia, especially since the article referenced is focused mainly on mathematics, and not personal love lifes.

I felt a little bad for hamilton, here, and I feel that characterizing his marriage as "unhappy" goes too far.

Thanks, please discuss.
-Ordy~

Revision as of 07:18, 12 August 2018

Template:Vital article

Quote query

"He was subsequently educated by James Hamilton (curate of Trim), his uncle and an Anglican priest." - does this mean he was educated by his uncle, James Hamilton, who was an Anglican priest, or does it mean that he was educated by three people, James Hamilton, an unnamed uncle, and an unnamed Anglican priest??? 84.66.32.134 15:30, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Alternative version of article

The article below seems not to belong on a "talk" page but to be simply an alternative version of a subject article. While it might make sense to merge those things that aren't already in the referenced article into that one, why was this put here? - BRG 16:35, 7 Nov 2003 (UTC)

The article below is the chapter on Hamilton from: Alexander Macfarlane, Lectures on ten British mathematicians of the nineteenth century, 1916, pp 34-49. Internet Archive: Lectures on ten British mathematicians. It should indeed not be repeated here. Perhaps it could be added as a reference in the article since Macfarlane seems to have been one of the first to leave the suggestion that later in life Hamilton had become an alcoholic, even without literally saying that, see p. 46 of Macfarlane's chapter. VWA (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted the copy from Macfarlane's chapter since it can be read on the Internet Archive using the link given above. VWA (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

needs work

This entry needs a lot of work. For example:

In 1827, Hamilton presented a theory that provided a single function that brings together mechanics, optics and mathematics. It helped in establishing the wave theory of light. He proposed for it when he first predicted its existence in the third supplement to his "Systems of Rays," read in 1832.

What does proposed for it mean? Predicted the existence of WHAT??

For some reason there is a brief discussion of the incredibly important `Hamiltonian' approach to classical mechanics at the end of the section on quaternions. The Hamiltonian approach is vastly more important than the quaternions - and I say this as a huge fan of the quaternions. It should be treated together with his other work on dynamics.

Mathematician

Although Hamilton had of course a huge influence on physics, he was a mathematician and without exception referred to his own work as mathematics. VWA (talk) 08:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it into: mathematician, astronomer and mathematical physicist. That in his days Hamilton was certainly also seen as an astronomer can for instance be seen by this quote from the second volume of Graves' biography, regarding the 1842 meeting of the British Association in Manchester: "The Athenaeum mentions that peculiar interest was excited by the presence of the three great astronomers, Bessel, Herschel, and Hamilton, who were seen seated together on the platform." https://archive.org/stream/lifeofsirwilliam02grav#page/386/mode/2up VWA (talk) 23:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on William Rowan Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Competition against Zerah Colburn

My source, Math & Mathematicians: The History of Math Discoveries Around the World (ISBN 0-7876-3813-7) states that the competition between William Rowan Hamilton and Zerah Colburn occurred in 1818 when Hamilton was 13. Is that correct? Thank you, Vincentupsdellred (talk) 17:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

The new entry (Dec 2017) on Hamilton's private life needs editing. Hamilton was not rejected by Catherine Disney and he certainly did not propose to Aubrey de Vere. Moreover, the entry comes from one source which does not seem to claim to be an original biographic one. I cannot cite from our own work in which we give a far more positive view on the private lives of Hamilton and his wife and discuss where this extremely negative view came from, https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2017.1400821, and therefore I would like to ask someone who thinks we have a point, or not, to consider editing this entry. VWA (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

no Declined Please see the edit request template box above for more information about your request. Regards, Spintendo ᔦᔭ 22:54, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quaternions

In the article Quaternion it is stated about Olinde Rodrigues and the discovery of the quaternions: "Important precursors to this work included Euler's four-square identity (1748) and Olinde Rodrigues' parameterization of general rotations by four parameters (1840), but neither of these writers treated the four-parameter rotations as an algebra.[7][8] Carl Friedrich Gauss had also discovered quaternions in 1819, but this work was not published until 1900.[9][10]" That seems to me much more nuanced than the remark in this article: "The other great contribution Hamilton made to mathematical science was his discovery of quaternions in 1843.[12] However, in 1840, Benjamin Olinde Rodrigues had already reached a result that amounted to their discovery in all but name.[13]" Since I am not a mathematician I will not alter the text, but give the comparison for consideration. VWA (talk) 12:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

=

Hello,

Apologies, as I don't understand how to edit wiki talk articles, but I wanted to add my opinion here.

I was reading the "Personal Life" section, and I read this: "Hamilton's married life turned out to be difficult and unhappy as Bayly proved to be pious, shy, timid, and chronically ill."

My own personal feelings is that this too subjective to be in an encyclopedia, especially since the article referenced is focused mainly on mathematics, and not personal love lifes.

I felt a little bad for hamilton, here, and I feel that characterizing his marriage as "unhappy" goes too far.

Thanks, please discuss. -Ordy~

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:William_Rowan_Hamilton&oldid=854562029"