Bʼaga languages: Difference between revisions
Glottolog classified it as independent family |
No edit summary |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
[[Category:Komuz languages]] |
[[Category:Komuz languages]] |
||
[[Category:Gumuz languages| ]] |
|||
[[Category:Language families]] |
[[Category:Language families]] |
Revision as of 01:07, 21 April 2018
Gumuz | |
---|---|
B'aga | |
Geographic distribution | border of Ethiopia and Sudan |
Ethnicity | Gumuz |
Linguistic classification | Nilo-Saharan?
|
Subdivisions | |
Language codes | |
Glottolog | gumu1250 |
Gumuz is a small language family spoken along the border of Ethiopia and Sudan. It has been tentatively classified within the Nilo-Saharan family, perhaps closest to the Koman languages.
Languages
There are three or four Gumuz languages. Grammatical forms are distinct between Northern Gumuz and Southern Gumuz.[1] Yaso is at least a divergent dialect, perhaps distinct enough to count as a separate language. Daats'iin, discovered in 2013, is closest to Southern Gumuz.
Classification
Dimmendaal (2008) notes that mounting grammatical evidence has made the Nilo-Saharan proposal as a whole more sound since Greenberg proposed it in 1963, but that such evidence has not been forthcoming for Songhay, Koman, and Gumuz: "very few of the more widespread nominal and verbal morphological markers of Nilo-Saharan are attested in the Coman languages plus Gumuz ... Their genetic status remains debatable, mainly due to lack of more extensive data." (2008:843) And later, "In summarizing the current state of knowledge, ... the following language families or phyla can be identified — ... Mande, Songhai, Ubangian, Kadu, and the Coman languages plus Gumuz." (2008:844)
This "Coman plus Gumuz" is what Greenberg (1963) had subsumed under Koman and what Bender (1989) had called Komuz, a broader family consisting of Gumuz and the Koman languages. However, Bender (2000) separated Gumuz as at least a distinct branch of Nilo-Saharan, and suggested that it might even be a language isolate. Dimmendaal (2000), who tentatively included Koman within Nilo-Saharan, excluded Gumuz as an isolate, as it did not share the tripartite singulative–collective–plurative number system characteristic of the rest of the Nilo-Saharan language families. Ahland (2010, 2012), however, reports that with better attestation, Gumuz does indeed appear to be Nilo-Saharan, and perhaps closest to Koman. It has grammatical forms that resemble what might be expected from an ancestral proto-Nilo-Saharan language. Gumuz may thus help elucidate the family, which is extremely diverse and has been difficult to substantiate.
Notes
- ^ Ahland, Colleen Anne. 2004. "Linguistic variation within Gumuz: a study of the relationship between historical change and intelligibility." M.A. thesis. University of Texas at Arlington.
References
- Ahland, Colleen Anne. "The Classification of Gumuz and Koman Languages",[1] presented at the Language Isolates in Africa workshop, Lyons, December 4, 2010
- Lionel Bender, 2000. "Nilo-Saharan". In Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse (eds.), African Languages: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
- Dimmendaal, Gerrit J., 2000. "Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo- Saharan languages". Anthrolopological Linguistics 42:214-261.
- Gerrit Dimmendaal, 2008. "Language Ecology and Linguistic Diversity on the African Continent", Language and Linguistics Compass 2/5:842.