Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boghos torosian: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Boghos+torosian%22&btnG=Search 0 Google hits] for his name. Makes an odd claim to notability, but no [[WP:V|verifiability]] [[User:Porqin|Porqin]] 13:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22Boghos+torosian%22&btnG=Search 0 Google hits] for his name. Makes an odd claim to notability, but no [[WP:V|verifiability]] [[User:Porqin|Porqin]] 13:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong delete in current form''' if it doesn't change from the unsourced, original research, NPOV "inspiration" type language, I can't endorse it remaining on wikipedia. If it got reworded I'd be saying just delete for original research, and unverifiable. [[User:Ikanreed|i kan reed]] 13:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Strong delete in current form''' if it doesn't change from the unsourced, original research, NPOV "inspiration" type language, I can't endorse it remaining on wikipedia. If it got reworded I'd be saying just delete for original research, and unverifiable. [[User:Ikanreed|i kan reed]] 13:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' unless [[WP:V|verifiable]] [[WP:RS|sources]] can be [[WP:CITE|cited]]. The [[WP:NPOV|POV]] can be reworded, but I'm mostly concerned about [[WP:V|unverfiable]] claims and a lack of Ghits. That makes me suspicious of a [[WP:HOAX|hoax]]. [[User:Scorpiondollprincess|Scorpiondollprincess]] 14:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:11, 10 August 2006
0 Google hits for his name. Makes an odd claim to notability, but no verifiability Porqin 13:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete in current form if it doesn't change from the unsourced, original research, NPOV "inspiration" type language, I can't endorse it remaining on wikipedia. If it got reworded I'd be saying just delete for original research, and unverifiable. i kan reed 13:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete unless verifiable sources can be cited. The POV can be reworded, but I'm mostly concerned about unverfiable claims and a lack of Ghits. That makes me suspicious of a hoax. Scorpiondollprincess 14:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)