Talk:Toolchain: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
DanielPharos (talk | contribs) Added assessment |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I'm not sure, but it's a useful concept, in software and in the history of civilization. You can't have metal tools without a forge of some kind, and you can't have a compiler without a bootstrap machine language. --[[User:BlueNight|BlueNight]] ([[User talk:BlueNight|talk]]) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC) |
:I'm not sure, but it's a useful concept, in software and in the history of civilization. You can't have metal tools without a forge of some kind, and you can't have a compiler without a bootstrap machine language. --[[User:BlueNight|BlueNight]] ([[User talk:BlueNight|talk]]) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC) |
||
I have nevr heard of this term either. I would agree that it's a GNU-related term. |
|||
RayGhost-Use way as no way; Use limitation as no limitation 18:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:32, 12 July 2015
Software: Computing Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Origin of the word?
Any idea when this term came into use? To me it seems somewhat recent and coming from the GNU world. Anyone know? Billgordon1099 04:43, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, but it's a useful concept, in software and in the history of civilization. You can't have metal tools without a forge of some kind, and you can't have a compiler without a bootstrap machine language. --BlueNight (talk) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
I have nevr heard of this term either. I would agree that it's a GNU-related term.
RayGhost-Use way as no way; Use limitation as no limitation 18:32, 12 July 2015 (UTC)