User talk:Janagewen

Dear readers of mine, I would practice German from now, and plan to write more and more on Computer science. If you are interested in what I have ever written on Wikipedia.org English, you might see me on Wikipedia.org German in not very far future. People say good is always good, and time will tell this unfair treatment to me is only the loss of what they done, not belonging to me. Gold would always differentiate itself from yellow soil, and I have to say Sorry to Wikipedia.org Engilsh, goodbye! Janagewen (talk) 07:42, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

What's more, I suggested my revision of .net framework on many other languages of Wikipedia.org, let us see would it be chosen as a reference in the future. I just forget that I have also written something on computer science on Wikipedia.org Chinese, too. If you are interested in practicing Chinese, there you could see me. It is just the beginning of my experience on Wikipedia.org rather than English.

Any administrators or some relative ones, please do not modify this page for reserve your respect for yourself! I have to say that world is unfair, and unfair is great! But birth and death is the fair! Janagewen (talk) 08:18, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Let Us Hear What Other Editors on Wikipedia.org English Commented on My Talks Removed

"Reverted good faith edits by Janagewen: Rvt misuser of talk page. It is for communication with other editors. Use a sandbox for your work, and actually communicate civilly with other editors. Otherwise leave here" from user BullRangifer.

"Removed article crap on talkpage - Please consider creating a sandbox" from user Davey2010

OK, if you are interested that what it is, see the history please. Janagewen (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Janagewen

User:Janagewen, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Janagewen and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Janagewen during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:10, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 06:19, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Janagewen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I post many useful information on many talk pages, for example, x86-64's talk page, .net framework template, talk on AMD Bulldozer, correct explanation on 52-bit of PAE, corrections on Sun Solaris, and many more...see my contribution. So their reason to block me indefinitely is totally defenitively a shit! But please don't get me wrong, that does not mean I want to be unblocked. I just express several people on Wikipedia.org done to me is unfair. But they have done to me, making me lose the faith in Wikipedia.org English, I am very sorry! Janagewen (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I post many useful information on many talk pages, for example, x86-64's talk page, .net framework template, talk on AMD Bulldozer, correct explanation on 52-bit of PAE, corrections on Sun Solaris, and many more...see my contribution. So their reason to block me indefinitely is totally defenitively a shit! But please don't get me wrong, that does not mean I want to be unblocked. I just express several people on Wikipedia.org done to me is unfair. But they have done to me, making me lose the faith in Wikipedia.org English, I am very sorry! [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen#top|talk]]) 06:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I post many useful information on many talk pages, for example, x86-64's talk page, .net framework template, talk on AMD Bulldozer, correct explanation on 52-bit of PAE, corrections on Sun Solaris, and many more...see my contribution. So their reason to block me indefinitely is totally defenitively a shit! But please don't get me wrong, that does not mean I want to be unblocked. I just express several people on Wikipedia.org done to me is unfair. But they have done to me, making me lose the faith in Wikipedia.org English, I am very sorry! [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen#top|talk]]) 06:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I post many useful information on many talk pages, for example, x86-64's talk page, .net framework template, talk on AMD Bulldozer, correct explanation on 52-bit of PAE, corrections on Sun Solaris, and many more...see my contribution. So their reason to block me indefinitely is totally defenitively a shit! But please don't get me wrong, that does not mean I want to be unblocked. I just express several people on Wikipedia.org done to me is unfair. But they have done to me, making me lose the faith in Wikipedia.org English, I am very sorry! [[User:Janagewen|Janagewen]] ([[User talk:Janagewen#top|talk]]) 06:55, 23 November 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}