User talk:109.151.75.173: Difference between revisions
Niteshift36 (talk | contribs) →January 2014: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]]. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person{{spaces|1}}on [[:Frank Dux]], but that you didn’t support your changes with a [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|citation to a reliable source]], so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|how we write about living people]], so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Niteshift36|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-biog1 --> [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 14:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]]. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person{{spaces|1}}on [[:Frank Dux]], but that you didn’t support your changes with a [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|citation to a reliable source]], so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|how we write about living people]], so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Niteshift36|my talk page]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-biog1 --> [[User:Niteshift36|Niteshift36]] ([[User talk:Niteshift36|talk]]) 14:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Response== |
|||
Hi - while I understand and respect the strict governance of living person's pages and the potential of desecration, rest assured the source is not "unreliable" - the original article's lighthearted tone regarding procurement of the leaked Dux fight footage was changed to more accurately reflect the situation. There is no doubt whatsoever of the authenticity of the information - which I have verified across a wide range of people in the Asian and American martial arts communities. |
|||
I trust that the content can be reinserted to reflect the new developments; it would be a gross injustice to have a section doubting this individual's legitimacy, YET disallow the inclusion of a journalist's work that has, to many, vindicated him. |
|||
Thus, the content I added was legitimate, and I trust there should be no issue with its inclusion - even if in edited form. Thank you kindly. |
|||
Revision as of 11:43, 16 January 2014
January 2014
Hello, I'm Niteshift36. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Frank Dux, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Response
Hi - while I understand and respect the strict governance of living person's pages and the potential of desecration, rest assured the source is not "unreliable" - the original article's lighthearted tone regarding procurement of the leaked Dux fight footage was changed to more accurately reflect the situation. There is no doubt whatsoever of the authenticity of the information - which I have verified across a wide range of people in the Asian and American martial arts communities.
I trust that the content can be reinserted to reflect the new developments; it would be a gross injustice to have a section doubting this individual's legitimacy, YET disallow the inclusion of a journalist's work that has, to many, vindicated him.
Thus, the content I added was legitimate, and I trust there should be no issue with its inclusion - even if in edited form. Thank you kindly.