Talk:Democratic republic: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:19, 12 December 2013

Politics Stub‑class Top‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor on 8 March 2013.

Hey,

What happened to the page? I need a disambiguation or something. These words are very politicized and I needs some clarity:

Democratic republic constitutional democracy Constitutional republic federal republic

These seem to be all bandied about.

-Grok70 or Sam_gunn (i'll figure out my user name later.)

While I am not an editor of this article, I don't understand the objection. Are you saying that you believe that the terms used in the article are "too politicized" on a political subject matter? Or are you saying that you believe the terminology in the article is used to imply political agenda(s) or bias? As to the first, governments are political by nature. This would be like saying that scientific terms are too scientific for an article on or about Science. As to the second, I don't personally agree that this article has any bias toward any particular political agenda. But if you disagree on the neutrality of the article, that certainly would be worth discussing. 165.138.95.59 (talk) 17:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 07:56, 9 March 2013 edit BryanG (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,566 edits {{Old prod full}} ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:19, 12 December 2013 edit undo 165.138.95.59 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:

	-Grok70 or Sam_gunn (i'll figure out my user name later.)		-Grok70 or Sam_gunn (i'll figure out my user name later.)

			While I am not an editor of this article, I don't understand the objection. ''Are you saying that you believe that the terms used in the article are "too politicized" on a political subject matter?'' Or '''are you saying that you believe the terminology in the article is used to imply political agenda(s) or bias?''' As to the first, governments are political by nature. This would be like saying that scientific terms are too scientific for an article on or about Science. As to the second, I don't personally agree that this article has any bias toward any particular political agenda. But if you disagree on the neutrality of the article, that certainly would be worth discussing. [[Special:Contributions/165.138.95.59\|165.138.95.59]] ([[User talk:165.138.95.59\|talk]]) 17:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC)