Jump to content

Procedural defense: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Remove blatantly speculative POV ("Such defenses tend to be unpopular with the public...")
m Stub-sorting. You can help!
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
In [[jurisprudence]], '''procedural defenses''' are a form of [[defense (legal)|defense]], via which a [[party (law)|party]] argues that they should not be held [[liability|liable]] for for a legal charge or claim brought against them. The term has applications in both [[criminal law]] and [[civil law]] in [[common law]] jurisdictions.
In [[jurisprudence]], '''procedural defenses''' are a form of [[defense (legal)|defense]], via which a [[party (law)|party]] argues that they should not be held [[liability|liable]] for for a legal charge or claim brought against them. The term has applications in both [[criminal law]] and [[civil law]] in [[common law]] jurisdictions.
{{CrimPro}}
{{CrimPro}}
Line 14: Line 13:
* [[legal technicality]]
* [[legal technicality]]
[[Category:Criminal defenses]]
[[Category:Criminal defenses]]

{{law-stub}}

Revision as of 18:23, 22 May 2006

In jurisprudence, procedural defenses are a form of defense, via which a party argues that they should not be held liable for for a legal charge or claim brought against them. The term has applications in both criminal law and civil law in common law jurisdictions.

In the United States, procedural defenses include:

See also