User talk:Gdandsnahb: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Rv the block must be intact while it is still in effect |
Gdandsnahb (talk | contribs) RV: In accordance with WP:VERIFIABILITY, this information is unreliable/unverifiable. Accuracy comes first! :) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you take issue with activity from this account, post hyperlinks to the policies allegedly breached. --[[User:Gdandsnahb|Gdandsnahb]] ([[User talk:Gdandsnahb#top|talk]]) 04:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== November 2012 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''5 days''' for repeating the same behavior (inserting unsourced information) that got you blocked last time. Now, I see that you tried to make an unblock request then, but you formatted it improperly, which is why no one saw it. But your rationale there is not sufficient: Wikpedia requires that the information be verifiable. If it's verifiable on the BA website, then provide a link to that website. If you can't, then the info can't be included. Otherwise, how can a reader know that it's accurate? We have to provide sources, it's the only way that WP works. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 13:58, 14 November 2012 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|reason=I stopped editing the page after your block and warning. UNBLOCK ME. --[[User:Gdandsnahb|Gdandsnahb]] ([[User talk:Gdandsnahb#top|talk]]) 16:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC) [[User:Gdandsnahb|Gdandsnahb]] ([[User talk:Gdandsnahb#top|talk]]) 16:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)|decline=You stopped editing because of the block, not because of the warning, and your unblock request does not address the reason for your block. Are you prepared to follow wikipedia policy in the future in relation to adding valid references, even if your personal opinion is that you need not do so?--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 16:22, 14 November 2012 (UTC)}} |
|||
Revision as of 04:38, 19 November 2012
If you take issue with activity from this account, post hyperlinks to the policies allegedly breached. --Gdandsnahb (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2012 (UTC)