Jump to content

User:Giano: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Seems one is not even allowed to pass through and make an odd comment, if it says 'retired'
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
:*:Interestingly(?) enough, you are the one salient example I was speaking of; the one case I know of of someone who became a stern critic as a ''result'' of having been wronged. &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 20:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
:::::Oh I remember your concern well: Odd isn't it how this quote is removed from your contributuons record ~ I wish I had such magical friends [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coren&diff=prev&oldid=395949075#Personal_attacks]. [[User:Giano|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano|talk]]) 22:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC):
:::::::"*Giano, your paranoid delusions are taking a turn for the worse. I'm hoping this blows over soon before you cover yourself with ridicule, because your contributions (especially in architecture) are valuable; but you are quickly expending what little credibility you have left by insisting that the windmills are giants. The only place there is a conspiracy is in your own overactive imagination. You're being confused by a consuming grudge over an imagined slight to the point of twisting everything that happens into self-fulfilling confirmation of your delusion. And, to prove the point, you'll now deem me part of that conspiracy (if I wasn't already) for pointing this out.
:::::::Take a break away from Wikipedia for a few months and do something else to clear your head, or go and discuss things with a health professional. "Truly I was born to be an example of misfortune, and a target at which the arrows of adversary are aimed." — Coren (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC)"

*I have restored (it was removed overnight [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AJimbo_Wales&diff=521741601&oldid=521741365]) this comment above by Corent to my post as it's an exampled of how a sitting Arb (as Coren was at the time) can attack an editor, without rebuke from his peers) and then have the comment removed from his contributions, while at the same time condemning incivility and bullying. This is a prime example of the way that Wikipedia is run and it concerns many and it needs to change. [[User:Giano|Giano]] ([[User talk:Giano|talk]]) 07:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:55, 7 November 2012

  • Interestingly(?) enough, you are the one salient example I was speaking of; the one case I know of of someone who became a stern critic as a result of having been wronged. — Coren (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh I remember your concern well: Odd isn't it how this quote is removed from your contributuons record ~ I wish I had such magical friends [1]. Giano (talk) 22:37, 6 November 2012 (UTC):
"*Giano, your paranoid delusions are taking a turn for the worse. I'm hoping this blows over soon before you cover yourself with ridicule, because your contributions (especially in architecture) are valuable; but you are quickly expending what little credibility you have left by insisting that the windmills are giants. The only place there is a conspiracy is in your own overactive imagination. You're being confused by a consuming grudge over an imagined slight to the point of twisting everything that happens into self-fulfilling confirmation of your delusion. And, to prove the point, you'll now deem me part of that conspiracy (if I wasn't already) for pointing this out.
Take a break away from Wikipedia for a few months and do something else to clear your head, or go and discuss things with a health professional. "Truly I was born to be an example of misfortune, and a target at which the arrows of adversary are aimed." — Coren (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2010 (UTC)"
  • I have restored (it was removed overnight [2]) this comment above by Corent to my post as it's an exampled of how a sitting Arb (as Coren was at the time) can attack an editor, without rebuke from his peers) and then have the comment removed from his contributions, while at the same time condemning incivility and bullying. This is a prime example of the way that Wikipedia is run and it concerns many and it needs to change. Giano (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)