Jump to content

Test (law): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Canada: added tests to section
→‎Canada: added tests to section
Line 36: Line 36:
*[[Meiorin_case#Meiorin_test|Meioran test]]
*[[Meiorin_case#Meiorin_test|Meioran test]]
*[[Law_v._Canada_(Minister_of_Employment_and_Immigration)|Law Test]]
*[[Law_v._Canada_(Minister_of_Employment_and_Immigration)|Law Test]]
*Multiple Access test
*[[General_Motors_v._City_National_Leasing|Necessarily incidental doctrine]]
*[[General_Motors_v._City_National_Leasing|Necessarily incidental doctrine]]
*[[Oakes_test#Oakes_test|Oakes test]]
*[[Oakes_test#Oakes_test|Oakes test]]
Line 41: Line 42:
*[[Patently unreasonable|Patent unreasonableness test]]
*[[Patently unreasonable|Patent unreasonableness test]]
*[[Pith_and_substance|Pith and substance test]] (see also [[R._v._Morgentaler_(1993)|R. v. Morgentaler]])
*[[Pith_and_substance|Pith and substance test]] (see also [[R._v._Morgentaler_(1993)|R. v. Morgentaler]])
*Multiple Access test
*Provincial Inability test
*Purpose and form test
*Purpose and form test
*[[Real_and_substantial_connection|Real and Substantial Connection test]]
*[[Real_and_substantial_connection|Real and Substantial Connection test]]

Revision as of 22:34, 12 October 2012

Legal tests are various kinds of commonly applied methods of evaluation used to resolve matters of jurisprudence.[1] In the context of a trial, a hearing, discovery, or other kinds of legal proceedings, the resolution of certain questions of fact or law may hinge on the application of one or more legal tests.

Legal tests are often formulated from the logical analysis of a judicial decision or a court order where it appears that a finder of fact or the court made a particular decision after contemplating a well-defined set of circumstances. It is assumed that evaluating any given set of circumstances under a legal test will lead to an unambiguous and repeatable result.

International law

Common law

Canada

United Kingdom

United States

Notes and references

  1. ^ Cane, Peter (2002). Responsibility in Law and Morality. Hart Publishing. ISBN 1-84113-321-3.