User talk:Madvirgin: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Retired}} |
|||
[[User:Madvirgin|Madvirgin]] ([[User talk:Madvirgin#top|talk]]) 22:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
[[User:Madvirgin|Madvirgin]] ([[User talk:Madvirgin#top|talk]]) 22:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 09:41, 3 July 2012
Madvirgin (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rockstar (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Karthik Nadar (talk) 16:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
You don't have any experience for moving a page, so please refrain from doing so again without discussing in article talkpage. Karthik Nadar (talk) 16:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Navagatharkku Swagatham
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Navagatharkku Swagatham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George Ponderevo (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Naughty Professor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Janardhanan
- Tini Tom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pattalam
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
hai bullleting reviews will increase readability....and ppl are using wikipedia to read articles and if its not readable then what is the use.....?Vinayachandranlovedr (talk) 04:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)