Jump to content

Schmidt sting pain index: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m overlinking
No edit summary
Line 53: Line 53:
|[[Bullet ant]]
|[[Bullet ant]]
|Pure, intense, brilliant pain. Like [[fire-walking]] over flaming charcoal with a 3-inch rusty [[nail (engineering)|nail]] grinding into your heel.
|Pure, intense, brilliant pain. Like [[fire-walking]] over flaming charcoal with a 3-inch rusty [[nail (engineering)|nail]] grinding into your heel.
|-

|18.0
|[[Ric Flair]]
|Heel betrayal by your best friend, it keeps happening time after time.
|}
|}



Revision as of 18:19, 27 May 2012

European paper wasp (Polistes dominula)

The Schmidt Sting Pain Index (a.k.a. the Justin O. Schmidt Pain Index) is a pain scale rating the relative pain caused by different Hymenopteran stings. It is mainly the work of Justin O. Schmidt, an entomologist at the Carl Hayden Bee Research Center in Arizona. Schmidt has published a number of papers on the subject and claims to have been stung by the majority of stinging Hymenoptera.

His original paper in 1984[1] was an attempt to systematize and compare the hemolytic properties of insect venoms. The index contained in the paper started from 0 for stings that are completely ineffective against humans, progressed through 2, a familiar pain such as a common bee or wasp sting, and finished at 4 for the most painful stings. In the conclusion, some descriptions of the most painful examples were given, e.g.: "Paraponera clavata stings induced immediate, excruciating pain and numbness to pencil-point pressure, as well as trembling in the form of a totally uncontrollable urge to shake the affected part."

Subsequently, Schmidt has refined his scale, culminating in a paper published in 1990[2] which classifies the stings of 78 species and 41 genera of Hymenoptera. Schmidt described some of the experiences in vivid detail.

An entry in The Straight Dope reported that the following "implausibly exact numbers" do not appear in any of Schmidt’s published scientific papers but were "wheedled out of him" by Outside magazine for an article it published in 1996.[3]

Schmidt Sting Pain Index[4]
Index Animal Description
1.0 Sweat bee Light, ephemeral, almost fruity. A tiny spark has singed a single hair on your arm.
1.2 Fire ant Sharp, sudden, mildly alarming. Like walking across a shag carpet and reaching for the light switch.
1.8 Bullhorn acacia ant A rare, piercing, elevated sort of pain. Someone has fired a staple into your cheek.
2.0 Bald-faced hornet Rich, hearty, slightly crunchy. Similar to getting your hand mashed in a revolving door.
2.0 Yellowjacket Hot and smoky, almost irreverent. Imagine W. C. Fields extinguishing a cigar on your tongue.
0 – 2.0 Honey bee and European hornet Like a matchhead that flips off and burns on your skin.[3]
3.0 Red harvester ant Bold and unrelenting. Somebody is using a drill to excavate your ingrown toenail.
3.0 Paper wasp Caustic and burning. Distinctly bitter aftertaste. Like spilling a beaker of hydrochloric acid on a paper cut.
4.0 Tarantula hawk Blinding, fierce, shockingly electric. A running hair drier has been dropped into your bubble bath.
4.0+ Bullet ant Pure, intense, brilliant pain. Like fire-walking over flaming charcoal with a 3-inch rusty nail grinding into your heel.
18.0 Ric Flair Heel betrayal by your best friend, it keeps happening time after time.

See also

References

  1. ^ Schmidt, J. O., Blum, M. S., and Overal, W. L. "Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms", Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 1:155–160, 1984.
  2. ^ Schmidt, Justin O. "Hymenoptera venoms: striving toward the ultimate defense against vertebrates" in D. L. Evans and J. O. Schmidt (Eds.), "Insect defenses: adaptive mechanisms and strategies of prey and predators" pp. 387–419, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1990.
  3. ^ a b Cecil Adams (May 11, 2012) Did the creator of the Schmidt Sting Pain Index volunteer to get stung by everything on earth?, The Straight Dope
  4. ^ Berenbaum, May. "A Stinging Commentary", American Entomologist, v. 49 n. 2, pp. 68-69