User talk:7arazred: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
←Replaced content with ' {{unblock | I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to ...' |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=|link=]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|abuse of editing privileges]]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. ([[User talk:Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">talk→</font>]]<span style="border:1px solid black;">''' [[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]] '''</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|<font style="font-variant:small-caps">←track</font>]]) 10:04, 2 November 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
|||
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=193.111.221.60 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Disruptive editing|Disruptive editing]]</nowiki> | 3=Bwilkins | decline=You are blocked directly; you will need to explain your actions and give a reason for unblocking. [[User:Kuru|<span style="font-family:Segoe print; color:#cd853f; text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru</span>]] [[User talk:Kuru|<span style="color:#f5deb3">''(talk)''</span>]] 20:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|reason=At first, the Expire Date was 1 December, then it just changed to 2 December, and then again to 3 December, so it's unfair to me, since I should have been unblocked on 1 December|decline=Not so. You are blocked indefinitely; that does not mean for ever, it means until you can satisfy the community that unblocking you will benefit the encyclopedia. Your call.--<font color="Red">[[User:Anthony Bradbury|'''Anthony Bradbury''']]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]]</font></sup> 20:49, 3 December 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Yes, it so, because it said EXPIRE DATE: 1 DECEMBER 2......so, I SHOULD BE, and how can I show people that I would benifit the encyclopedia, if I am BLOCKED, and can only edit my page... :( I do want to benifit, but can't..... [[User:7arazred|7arazred]] ([[User talk:7arazred#top|talk]]) 20:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC) | decline=Does not address the reasons of the block. The days you're quoting are simply the autoblock, you are blocked indefinitively, this block will not be lifted until such time as you can address the reasons that led to your block and how your behavior has since changed. Asking repeatedly for unblock without providing any reasoning as to why you should be unblocked is not helpful. Regards, <i><b>[[User:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">Snowolf</font>]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Snowolf|<font color = "darkmagenta">How can I help?</font>]]</small></sup></b></i> 21:01, 3 December 2011 (UTC)}} |
|||
:Note: there are two different blocks to consider. The IP address {{useranon|193.111.221.60}} was blocked for 1 month commencing 17:48, 2 November 2011 but {{user|7arazred}} was blocked indefinitely at 10:02, 2 November 2011. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#d30000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 20:59, 3 December 2011 (UTC) |
|||
{{unblock | I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :)}} |
{{unblock | I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :)}} |
||
Revision as of 18:31, 4 December 2011
7arazred (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= I am sorry for the disruptive editing that I did...... I understand now that I shouldn't keep re-nominating an article that I think deserves to be an Good Article if I think so, and I re-nominated the Article (Revolution Software) so much, without barely improving it, and I am sorry. I will try to benifit to Wikipedia as much as I can, and I won't cause trublle anymore. :) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}