User talk:Savidan: Difference between revisions
DYKadminBot (talk | contribs) Giving DYK credit for Pope Sergius I on behalf of [[User:|]] |
dyk problem |
||
Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#September 18 2009|September 18, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Pope Sergius I]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]])</sub> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
|On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#September 18 2009|September 18, 2009]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know?]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Pope Sergius I]]''''', which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page <sub>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]])</sub> and add it to [[WP:DYKSTATS|DYKSTATS]] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know? talk page]]. |
||
|} [[WP:DYK|Wikiproject: Did you know?]] 21:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
|} [[WP:DYK|Wikiproject: Did you know?]] 21:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
||
==DYK nomination of Pope John VI== |
|||
[[Image:Symbol question.svg|25px]] Hello! Your submission of [[Pope John VI]] at the [[Template talk:DYK|Did You Know nominations page]] has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath '''{{T:TDYK|Pope John VI|your nomination's entry}}''' and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> [[user:Javert|<font style="color:#4682b4">'''Javért'''</font>]] <sup>[[user talk:Javert|<font style="color:#50C878">'''☆'''</font>]]</sup> 02:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:54, 21 September 2009
Archives |
---|
|
DYK for Cardinal protector of England
SoWhy 02:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Reorganization of occupied dioceses during World War II
Royalbroil 20:14, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Galeotto della Rovere
Good Day, Is there a problem with uploading this image to Commons? I would like to use it on the Afrikaans wiki. If not on commons how can I use it on the Afrikaans wiki. Thanks for you help. Hansjoseph (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- If you determine that the images are sufficiently "free" to meet the Commons' copyright policy, please feel free to upload them to Commons. I personally choose to focus my efforts on the English Wikipedia due to time limitations, and that is the only reason I haven't uploaded it to commons myself. As I am not the copyright holder, you do not need my permission. Savidan 13:31, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Catholic clergy involvement with the Ustaše
Wikiproject: Did you know 14:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Pope Pius XII's 1942 Christmas address
WP:DYK 02:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Three Popes and the Jews
Royalbroil 14:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Information conflict
We appear to have a conflict of facts in our articles. Foreign relations of Pope Pius XII states: "Harada was accepted by Pius XII on May 31, 1942.", citing a New York Times. "Tokyo Envoy Received by Pope", while Ken Harada states: "as officially received on May 9, 1942.", citing Pierre Blett's "Pius XII and the Second World War: According to the Archives of the Vatican", which we both utilize as a source. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
GA Reassessment of Papal election, 1268–1271
I have done a GA Reassessment of the Papal election, 1268–1271 article as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to nearly meet the GA Criteria. It is lacking in a couple of places and I have outlined my concerns here. I have placed the article on hold for a week and I am notifying you as the primary editor of the hold. If you have questions please contact me on my talk page and I will be happy to discuss the review. H1nkles (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Query: DYK for Alperin v. Vatican Bank
Hello! Your submission of Alperin v. Vatican Bank at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:50, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Papee
You are very welcome. BTW good job with the article. Tymek (talk) 04:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Alperin v. Vatican Bank
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Conversion of Jews to Catholicism during the Holocaust
Hello! Your submission of Conversion of Jews to Catholicism during the Holocaust at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Otto4711 (talk) 17:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Foreign relations of Pope Pius XII
Wikiproject: Did you know? 02:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Diego von Bergen
Wikiproject: Did you know? 02:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Assata Shakur
I have reverted your reversions and opened a discussion of them on the Talk page of the Assata Shakur article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.213.239 (talk) 20:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Kazimierz Papée
WP:DYK 08:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:FOUR award for Cardinal-nephew
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on Cardinal-nephew. |
Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 15:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:FOUR
Thanks for the nominations at WP:FOUR. We hope to keep the backlog down by having each nominator second one of the other nominations for each nomination that he makes. If you get a chance please come by and award some nominations.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't see anything to that effect when I was there, but I'm more than happy to. Savidan 00:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:WP:FOUR
Thank you for the award. It was a totaly unexpected surprise. Tony the Marine (talk) 07:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
GA reassessment for Papal conclave, 1492
I have conducted a reassessment of this article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Papal conclave, 1492/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. You are being notified as you have been a major contributor to the article. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 13:49, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Re:Stepinac
Hello Savidan, my apologies for the belated response and thanks for your recognition of my efforts in the article. :) I am unfortunately not in possession of any significant source on Stepinac himself, I am far more knowledgeable in the history of Yugoslavia itself than Church-related information. My source was also not on Stepinac himself, but rather about the nature of the forced conversions that took place with respect to Stepinac's statement that they were "all in good faith" (rather silly, that :). As I do not have sources, I've restricted my edits on that article to fixing what I believe is a big problem: a lack of neutral wording and an NPOV in general. Besides that, I've also gotten to making general improvements in the article (a more appropriate infobox/succession box, native language name, etc...).
The main cause of the problem is that the man is a controversial figure. Some circles in Croatia literally worship the fellow and, as he had been beatified, refuse to acknowledge anything "negative" about him. The article was originally written in an anti-Yugoslav, Croatian nationalist tone (I am Croatian :), rife with bias in his favor. For instance, "Yugoslav army" became "Tito's communists", "Yugoslav court system" became the "communist Belgrade court", Yugoslav judicial authorities were simply "the communists", President Josip Broz Tito became "communist dictator Tito", etc. you get it... --DIREKTOR (TALK) 19:57, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- I understand what you mean, facts need sources, but what I'm talking about is the wording. While the facts were mostly correct (though many are unsourced), the phrasing of the article was (and probably still is) quite a bit biased. I shall endeavor to keep the text neutral, and yes, that also means keeping away from the other side as well. :) --DIREKTOR (TALK) 20:03, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it seems that we've got a problem with The existence of a familial relationship is disputed on that list. Any idea?? CarlosPn (talk) 10:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've temporarily replaced this file with till something better will be found CarlosPn (talk) 10:20, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Removal of references
Why do you make edits like this?[1] Its hard for me to see the value of importing text from elsewhere on Wikipedia and then nuking the references. Savidan 16:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- This version shows that the references ph36 doesn't show up properly on the article. I figured that the material was already covered in Phayer, 2000, p. 37. and that it didn't necessarily need to be added. See the previous column called media bias in the United States where the same thing happens with another ref called StephenZunesFPIC [2] ADM (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Alleged plot to kidnap Pope Pius XII
NW (Talk) 17:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apocalypse War
Evidently this was never listed in the deletion log. I closed it today. You are free to nominate individual articles but be aware that mass AfDs tend to attract their own 'keep' votes regardless of content. Also note that there is considerable variation between articles you listed. Some (like Horus Heresy) have seen deletion debates before and are borderline. Others are obviously notable, and still others obviously not notable. Just a heads up. Protonk (talk) 04:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Hilarius Breitinger
Wikiproject: Did you know? 11:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Pope Constantine
Mifter (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of William Kunstler
Hello! Your submission of William Kunstler at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 06:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Re: Pope Pius XII -> Pius XII
I did a history merge on the Pope Pius XII article, so that all edits are in one place. I'm not trying to change the naming conventions for popes - IMO they're fine as they are. Graham87 14:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:FOUR award for Tomb of Antipope John XXIII
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on Tomb of Antipope John XXIII. |
--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Four Award | ||
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work all through on Funerary Monument to Sir John Hawkwood. |
--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lateran Council of 649
Wikiproject: Did you know? 12:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pope Sisinnius
Hello! Your submission of Pope Sisinnius at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Materialscientist (talk) 05:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Request for Participation in Wikipedia Research
Savidan,
Your Request for Adminship (RfA) process was reviewed and studied by our research team at Carnegie Mellon University early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.
In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a survey we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The survey will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not instrusive in the Wikipedia community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Wikipedia community.
This survey is part of an ongoing research project by students and faculty at the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science and headed by Professor Robert Kraut.
Thank you!
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free comment on my talk page.
CMUResearcher (talk) 19:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Vatican in faction
Hi, this battle seems to be won, but can you think of any additions to Category:Films set in the Vatican and Category:Vatican in fiction? Johnbod (talk) 04:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Pope Sergius I
Wikiproject: Did you know? 21:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pope John VI
Hello! Your submission of Pope John VI at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Javért ☆ 02:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)