User talk:Pokrajac: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:12, 30 September 2005

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 21:23, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Ceda Jovanovic

Please take a look at that paragraph at Cedomir Jovanovic. I modified it to make it clear that he was only accused of being part of mafia. I am not sure what did you think was POV about it. The contacts were confirmed by Ceda himself, but actual involvement was denied. --Dejan Cabrilo 16:18, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Pokrajac, I do speak Serbian, but this is English wikipedia after all, and it is reasonable to assume that non-Serbian speakers will read our talk pages at one point or another. I didn't want to be rude or anything. So, what's up? --Dejan Cabrilo 18:01, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

uncredited image

The image Image:Savabg.JPG that you uploaded on 24 Dec 2004 does not have any information on it's source. Please would you add the appripriate credit and tag as per wikipedia's copyright tagging policy. Thanks, JeremyA 02:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Srpska glava

This is Wikipedia not The Goverment of Serbia--Hipi Zhdripi 21:21, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You probably dont know nothing about content of UN resolution 1244. But, this is de jure situation. De facto should be described inside of document. --M. Pokrajac 21:33, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It s not the truth, it s just a interpretation from the serbian governnment, to tell them popullation, that they are loosing nothing. It´s the same thing, like with UCK. Their point of view, they should put in the article " Republic of Kosovo", but not here.I`ve written an article with the subject "Kosovo and Metohija". Both subjects are one the wrong place here, they can be only in " History of Kosovo "In the article "Kosovo" is just place for present information, not for the past or future. No speculation, no propaganda, just facts .Nowhere you let a place for ACTUELL , CORRECT information from Kosovo. Do you acept UNMIK yes/no?--Hipi Zhdripi 21:44, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you are wrong. Acording the UN resolution 1244, Kosovo is part of FR Yugoslavia. Since, FRY is now Serbia and Montenegro, Kosovo is in it (and in Serbia, too). Please, read resolution 1244, and do changes in article Kosovo than. Unfortunately, you must respect this situation. UNMIK is ofcourse UN administrating service in Serbian Kosovo still. Perhaps, Kosovo should be independent state in future... It is not now! Just see 2nd page of resolution. Than you shell see the words: Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region, as set out in the Helsinki Final Act and annex 2. --M. Pokrajac 21:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See this page! Now, best regards, --M. Pokrajac 21:56, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

S/RES/1244 (1999)

Page 4

(c) Organizing and overseeing the development of provisional institutions

for democratic and autonomous self-government pending a political settlement, including the holding of elections;

(d) Transferring, as these institutions are established, its

administrative responsibilities while overseeing and supporting the consolidation of Kosovo’s local provisional institutions and other peacebuilding activities;

(e) Facilitating a political process designed to determine Kosovo’s future status, taking into account the Rambouillet accords (S/1999/648);
(f) In a final stage, overseeing the transfer of authority from Kosovo’s

provisional institutions to institutions established under a political settlement;

PAST, PRESENT = UNMIK, FUTURE. Do you acept UNMIK yes/no?---Hipi Zhdripi 23:48, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

self-government has no Kosovo Disctrik, ect...??????????????????????--Hipi Zhdripi 23:55, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a prophet ? Wikipedia isn`t a religion-book. I`ll not continue this discussion with you. My friend, you have a problem with UNMIK, not with me. Before you don`t say, that you accept UNMIK, we can`t go on. You aren`t able to accept the present.--Hipi Zhdripi 00:08, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can`t issue your standards. Once again: Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the other States of the region, as set out in the Helsinki Final Act and annex 2 Sorry. --M. Pokrajac 00:05, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend, you can`t read English... I wrote: UNMIK is ofcourse UN administrating service in Serbian Kosovo still. Perhaps, Kosovo should be independent state in future... . I accept UNMIK. Everybody accept UNMIK in Serbian Kosovo ofcourse. If you can not understand English, I`ll not gonna discuss whit you. What means "Srpska glava"? --M. Pokrajac 11:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo

Are you sure it is not a content dispute rather than vandalism? (See Wikipedia:Vandalism). I think it would be best to follow the steps at Dispute resolution if you can not form any agreement on the article's talk page. Please request protection if the dispute continues rather than reverting too often. Angela . 13:35, May 2, 2005 (UTC)

Ma nemoj mi pricati, da se desio neki vandalizam u vezi sa Kosovom? Dobrodosao na Vikipediju :)) Nemam ideju sta uraditi, ovo sto Angela predlaze je moguc korak ali covek ne govori bas dobro engleski pa bi tesko islo.

A taj defetizam, "dok se ne ozvaniči nezavisnost Kosova i Metohije", da nisam vise cuo! ;) Nikola 15:21, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Balasevic.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Balasevic.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 00:22, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

That would make it non-free. You might want to claim it as fairuse, but that is doubtful. Better to find a free image. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 01:57, May 27, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Zjoksimovic.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Zjoksimovic.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Image:Zcolic2.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Zcolic2.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Serbian portal

As the amount of material somehow connected with Serbs and Serbia on Wikipedia grows, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to form a SCG/Serb portal, so that all the articles about famous Serbs, Serb history, the Serb republic etc are more closely interlinked. This would also provide the casual reader with a easy to use encyclopaedia of everything they could wish to know about RS, SCG, the Serb diaspora etc. Јес' да је Србија мала и да је мало Срба али ипак има Палестински портал, Doctor Who портал, зато нема разлога да и ми ово не покренемо. At this stage I'm just gauging the amount of interest out there for this. If you support this idea, and want to help out, then just drop by my talk page -- estavisti 20:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: vandalism protections

Initially I didn't want to protect any pages, but this abuser is really persistent and wastes time. Please voice your opinion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/ARD and Jwalker so that you're on record. We need to show due diligence before banning someone. --Joy [shallot] 13:03, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Rakovica's

The reason why I removed the links "See Rakovica (disambiguation page)" is because it's unlikely that someone will accidentally stumble upon a page called "Rakovica, Bosnia and Herzegovina" (for example) and then be confused because they were looking for some other one. If they just searched for Rakovica they would get to the disambiguation page and this is a non-issue. --Joy [shallot] 23:21, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Template for discussion ...}} with {{subst:Template for discussion ...}}.

Image:Bg sava-danube.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Bg sava-danube.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

User Categorization

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro for instructions. -Alekk 23:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 | style="font-size: 80%" | [[:Image:Bg sava-danube.jpg]] has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion]]. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.
 |}
+== User Categorization ==
+You were listed on the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Serbia and Montenegro]] page as living in or being associated with Serbia and Montenegro. As part of the [[Wikipedia:User categorisation]] project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit [[:Category:Wikipedians in Serbia and Montenegro]] for instructions. -[[User:Alekk|Alekk]] 23:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)