User talk:Gwernol: Difference between revisions
m Reverted edits by 208.54.94.28 (talk) to last version by MiszaBot III |
|||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
Meter gauge -> [[Metre gauge]], can you move that too, per [[Talk:Meter gauge]]. So people at WpMoveRequest have less work. [[User:TrackConnect|TrackConnect]] ([[User talk:TrackConnect|talk]]) 16:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
Meter gauge -> [[Metre gauge]], can you move that too, per [[Talk:Meter gauge]]. So people at WpMoveRequest have less work. [[User:TrackConnect|TrackConnect]] ([[User talk:TrackConnect|talk]]) 16:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) |
||
== COI and AFD == |
|||
I wont bother to join Wikipedia to delete your "vanity spam cruft", Dan. I am not a banned user (still got the evidence for that, despite the months of unremitting cyberattacks) but on principle, I will not join. I *will* provide sufficient evident to assure that your the hypocrisy behind your abusive attacks for COI against others whilst applying alternative rules to yourself is known. If you erase it here, I'll make a new site, and post it to other places where persons can come and view it. Jig's up Dan. And *please* do come on my machine, use whatever tracking tools possible via Apple.com and G... I need some more forensics. I think you are on-board with the fact that the attacks are serious matters in continental Europe, and the United States, as well as being copied to the UK authorities. So please, do come on my computer - or arrange for some hackers to do it (the FBI-SSA CD told me that was how it was done, but he just didn't tell me who and how - I'm sure that this can all be brought out if needed. Just give us all the material to make that possible). |
|||
:: Oh, and p.s. Your three spam cruft articles are going to go. Booksmart was subsumed by Adobe's new products. You are not notable, Dan. Wikipedia is not to be used for self-advertising. Your hypocrisy was never ok. Neither the bullying. |
|||
:: Please come on my computer - I need more forensics. Or send over some kiddie hackers. We can catch them, and have them squeal on you. If they come from some small country somewhere I can have a regional office of my former employer help to procure evidence and testimony. With great pleasure. If not the U.S. Government. At this point, everyone is *embarassed* to pieces by you guys. And then there's those subpoenas of G..... [[Special:Contributions/208.54.94.28|208.54.94.28]] ([[User talk:208.54.94.28|talk]]) 19:27, 27 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:46, 27 July 2008
Hello. Welcome to my Talk page. Feel free to leave a comment at the bottom of the page. Please sign your comments by putting ~~~~ at the end. Thanks, Gwernol.
Archives
- /Archive 1 April 2005 through early March 2006
- /Archive 2 March 2006
- /Archive 3 April 2006
- /Archive 4 First half of May 2006
- /Archive 5 Second half of May 2006
- /Archive 6 First half of June 2006
- /Archive 7 Second half of June 2006
- /Archive 8 First half of July 2006
- /Archive 9 Second half of July 2006
- /Archive 10 First half of August 2006
- /Archive 11 Second half of August 2006
- /Archive 12 First half of September 2006
- /Archive 13 Second half of September 2006
- /Archive 14 First half of October 2006
- /Archive 15 Second half of October 2006
- /Archive 16 First half of November 2006
- /Archive 17 Second half of November 2006
- /Archive 18 December 2006
- /Archive 19 January 2007
- /Archive 20 February 2007
- /Archive 21 March 2007
- /Archive 22 April-December 2007
This page now automatically archived every 5 days by MizaBot III. The following archives were automatically created:
RETARDED! The Movie!
That article was for an actual film, I see no reason for it's removal.SUPERSHIPTIME (talk) 18:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Happy First Day of Spring!
Template:Saleisha Hello Gwernol,
Can you please replace Saliesha's picture with a more appropriate one. Or at the very best just remove the old one. Keep it clean.
Thank You
a saber type
Well technically it's not an actual "fan-film", considering that it's going to be a quite huge production, costing a great deal of money. It's an independent film, based off of descriptions of events that I found on this site, that also had no references. The weapon itself is loosely based off of a weapon that was briefly mentioned in a book that I read a long while back, which was only mentioned once as "A lightsaber, with a hilt of extraordinary length, and a short blade." Other than calling it, "The Mincris", there was no other mention of it after that. I just gave it a name since it's used in my film. But the part about the blue prints being found in a Sith tomb, along with a holocron was actually from that book.
But thank you for sending me what I had written.
[EDIT] Ah, I found some reference from official lucas arts published work that I can actually remember the name for.. Darth Nihl used a variation of this weapon. It was referred to as a "Lightsaber Cane", which I guess is why I forgot about him. The name "The Mincris" is what was on the holocron in the other book that I had read.
So... Yeah, Here's my visual proof of the weapon. http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/6/68/Nihlprofile.jpg
...
I just got sent two messages regarding vandalism for something I didn't write. You accused me of adding my birthday to the wiki entry for the date of Jan. 13. Seeing as how my birthday doesn't fall on that day, I suggest you and yours stop accusing me of something I clearly wasn't responsible for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.68.250.213 (talk • contribs)
Retr0
If a posting on the world wide web, by whatever means, can be considered for libel it must therefore be considered as 'published'. I am not into the minutiae of wikipedia but denying work published on the www, anywhere, is the wiki ideal being corrupted. Any knowledge once published, anywhere must be considered as new knowledge and consequently fit for inclusion in any encyclopedia, otherwise what is the point?
I accept the point about publishing 'original work' but not work on a web site whose contents are available to the world.
OK, I accept the knuckle rap for vandalism, just trying it on.
Made my rant on the [verifiability] page.
Hope you had a chance to check out the narrow gauge movies on my web page. Abbey Light Railway
Now off for two weeks in sunny Spain.
Why
I want to know why you keep sending me messages about me vandalizing Wikipedia. Ok, so I DID do something wrong on ###### but I wasn't lying about the Prostitution in Los Angeles, California since I used to live there I would know about that stuff. So please, please do not get me for stuff that you don't have facts about. Personally, I think you're TRYING to get me banned. Please don't do it unless you have good reason. I DID NOT THREATEN YOU!!!! You threatened me. I'm using freedom of speech and you can't ban me for that. Do what you like but I can get you banned just as well for threatening but I didn't threaten you, do some background research and TRY AND FIND WHERE I THREATENED YOU!! You won't find it! -Poison12346
VERY IMPRESSED
i LIKE YOU. bUT REALLY, WHAT THE PROB. iT IS NOT A CATERGORY? Master Redyva (talk)
- Hey. User:64.183.19.6 vandalised Iron Maiden. Do you want to drop him a note? I undid the edit. Master Redyva (talk)
edits on CA service desk page
Greetings Gwernol,
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I am writing you regarding the Wiki page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CA_Unicenter_Service_Desk.
I have been the user adding the external link titled 4utechnologies.com. We also run the world’s largest free forum of Unicenter Service Desk users. Users can go there and find solutions free of charge.
While 4uTechnologies is a consulting company, we are partnered on many different levels with CA, inc. Of course CA, Inc. is aware that 4uTechnologies has partnered with them for many years. We have a strategic partnership with education, services and we are a distributor for this software called Unicenter Service Desk.
I understand there has been a report about us (4uTech), yet this is not from CA, Inc. it is from a past employee “gityerfix”. This employee has sought to remove all our important information on Wikipedia.
If CA, INC. would request us to remove our external link, we of course, as their partner would be more than happy to do so. I feel 4uTechnologies; Inc. has been a part of Unicenter Service Desk history.
Thank you in advance for your attention and understanding on this matter.
eric@4uTechnologies.com CEO / President SJF /EJZ
I am trying to improve the definition of health and the corresponding Wikipedia entry. However, a bot and more recently you, have incorrectly reverted my changes, regarding them as vandalism. Please let me know if I am doing something inappropriate. The definition of health has not been changed since 1948 (there was an incorrect statement in the entry I found) and we will be celebrating its ratification by the United Nations on June 24. I believe that Wikipedia could play a key role in motivating the world community to think about how to define such an important aspect of our lives, and to do it as a global collective effort.
If you want to discuss this further, please contact me at ajadad@ehealthinnovation. org
Lordlactose: Inquiry
When I placed the link of my you tube eugenic video under the article about eugenics you deleted it. How come this link is allowed to be there. http://www.prometheism.net/ -- Lordlactose (talk) 14:42, June 24, 2008 (UTC)
domestic sheep
One link doesn't work, I'm trying to get them in alpa order, add a link to merino and and to the merino stud association, I know I hav mead e lot of mistakes but could you pleas let me finish.
Could you read the content of http://www.aasrp.org/ please, I get a backorder this domain, in other words they have let their domain laps. Is [dead link ] still the right thing to do? Actually it's a pretty bad page, when you close your browser it brings up a lot of rubbish. I will leave it for you to sort out I'm going t bed.
The --> was because I forgot how to put in a comment.
Signature
I've given Skeletal a new sig. Time to run it by you.Fairfieldfencer FFF 16:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello Gwernol. I see you have blocked the above user. Great. But now there's one IP account which I suspect belongs to him -- 99.229.75.229 (talk · contribs). This IP user keeps editing this userpage, and his general edits are practically the same and on the same articles. I'm therefore almost sure that it is the same person. I've been suspecting that for quite some time. What do you think? Regards, Shahid • Talk2me 20:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Could you kindly tell me how a warning not to try to perform autofellatio is not "neutral"? I believe that the act is quite risky, and couldcause severe pain and minor back injury. I would know, as it gave me a sore back for a week, and I don't want others to make the same mistake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.198.158.216 (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
...for reverting the vandalism to my user page. →Christian.И 06:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Why am I leaving Wikipedia?
Gwernol, take a good look at my user page! I believe it documents that fact that I have been a long time contributor of good articles related to my many years of engineering experience.
So why have I decided to leave Wikipedia? Because I have grown weary of the revisions made by unexperienced people who think they know a subject when they really don't know it. I am also weary of people who make revisions because they "know better than anyone else". In particular, the actions of one young postgrad student who calls himself Headbomb with whom it is impossible to reason because of his firm belief that he is infallible ... and that he and only he "knows better than anyone else". His attitude has finally been the last straw in making my decision to leave Wikipedia. I am simply tired of trying to reason with the likes of Headbomb.
Goodbye to all the friends I did make here in the past two and a half years or so. mbeychok (talk) 06:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. StaticGull Talk 12:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks a lot for reverting vandalism made to my user page. Chamal Talk 13:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Ken Livingstone and being blocked
I realize that what I entered in the article regarding Ken Livingstone was technically true, it did not belong in the article. Why though would it warrant a one week block? It should simply have been an error with a warning.--Comradesandalio (talk) 23:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Can you give examples please? You warned me about Livingstone. I also got one warning on the article on Rob Knox. But as I soon as I got that "warning", you blocked me already.--Comradesandalio (talk) 23:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
Gwernol, I am sorry for causing disruption. I will not cause them anymore. Thank you. RS1900 11:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Brown
I don't see how it is clear that she is not DPM. I'm not saying she is officially in the post, I'm saying that she is his right hand. HOw else to you say that but an acting note? When he's gone, she does PM Questions and if he dies, she become acting PM. Unless and until he formally names someone DPM, she de facto is. Therequiembellishere (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, but if we never including acting officeholders, we'd have a lot of blank and false sections on our boxes. David Paterson has the same thing, albeit in a less constructive way than it once was. Therequiembellishere (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Promperu
Dear Gwernol,
My name is Christopher Hooper. I am the photographer who was sponsored by PROMPERU to capture Machu Picchu with my full screen 360 x 360 photography. This can be verified by contacting the office of Vladimir Kochera, the former Peruvian embassador to the US directly in Washington DC. This one tour is part of a much larger project designed to digitally preserve all of the ancient ruins of the world. We are currently constructing the same thing for Chichen Itza. This time with the sponsorship of the Mexican archeological department INAH and the Departmente de Tourismo de Yucatan.
These tours after completed are given in donation to the respective tourism bureau for their own promotional needs. These sponsorships are not easy to get, and many people, including government officials, in all related countries came together to ensure the very best imagery. By closing the parks for these special photoshoots and accessing areas that people will never be able access in real life, we have truly captured the essence of these important places.
Because they are donated, they are funded in part by a simple Google adsense campaign. A far cry from "promotional in nature" it barely pays for the cost of production, but it does help.
This contribution was made to the Machu Picchu catagory because millions of your users will never have the oportunity to travel to Machu Picchu, most of them simply want to learn about this truly important place. We have recieved countless thank you letters from visitors who felt like they were really there because it was shot with this very new full screen 360 x 360 technology.
I understand that it is your job to assure that the listed contact is valid and true and I thank you for this. This content is important and needs to be shared with the thousands of students, travelers, and interested parties who use it and enjoy it.
Of course I ask you to feel free to edit the copy however you deem necessary, but most importantly, please include it.
Thank you for your time.
You may find out more about my photography by visiting my gallery here > http://www.VRWorldGallery.com
I can supply you with countless referrals as to my credentials and skills if need be.
Best regards,
Christopher Hooper 17:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)~~
AN notice
FYI, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Question - Ban for multiple sockpuppeteer. Garion96 (talk) 23:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
aboout iptv thing
Since that cabal case has already been opened, shouldn't go there and reject the mediation, or request that it's closed? --Enric Naval (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Using your admin right in editorial conflicts
Could you please follow established deleting policy? TrackConnect (talk) 15:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- i did move again, pls revert me TrackConnect (talk) 15:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I mean, this leads to no good solution. Pls revert my second move. TrackConnect (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- yes, move it back to Cape gauge. I even got to know it first under that name. That's probably the wide spread name for it (no source for that, but I don't contest that). TrackConnect (talk) 16:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I mean, this leads to no good solution. Pls revert my second move. TrackConnect (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Meter gauge
Meter gauge -> Metre gauge, can you move that too, per Talk:Meter gauge. So people at WpMoveRequest have less work. TrackConnect (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)