User talk:Calebb

* Click here to leave me a new message

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Calebb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Very unreasonable block - potentially used by Nakon to push his personal agenda (please council Nakon on appropriate use of admin privileges!) I have only made two very NPOV edits in the talk section of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. There are definitely no harrassing or personal attacks in these very short, concise recommendations to improve the article. Remember, it is very easy to lose a valuable contributing member due to rogue admins using their powers for personal reasons.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Very unreasonable block - potentially used by Nakon to push his personal agenda (please council Nakon on appropriate use of admin privileges!) I have only made two very NPOV edits in the talk section of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. There are definitely no harrassing or personal attacks in these very short, concise recommendations to improve the article. Remember, it is very easy to lose a valuable contributing member due to rogue admins using their powers for personal reasons. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Very unreasonable block - potentially used by Nakon to push his personal agenda (please council Nakon on appropriate use of admin privileges!) I have only made two very NPOV edits in the talk section of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. There are definitely no harrassing or personal attacks in these very short, concise recommendations to improve the article. Remember, it is very easy to lose a valuable contributing member due to rogue admins using their powers for personal reasons. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Very unreasonable block - potentially used by Nakon to push his personal agenda (please council Nakon on appropriate use of admin privileges!) I have only made two very NPOV edits in the talk section of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. There are definitely no harrassing or personal attacks in these very short, concise recommendations to improve the article. Remember, it is very easy to lose a valuable contributing member due to rogue admins using their powers for personal reasons. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

CalebBenefiel (talk) 07:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)