Jump to content

User talk:Lokyz: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs)
m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Lokyz/Archive Nov 2007
Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs)
m Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Lokyz/Archive Nov 2007
Line 3: Line 3:
==The article Baltic languages are under attack==
==The article Baltic languages are under attack==
[[Baltic languages]]
[[Baltic languages]]

=="Federal part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth"==
I think I know what you mean to convey, in the "[[Ignacy Domeyko]]" article, when speaking of the [[Grand Duchy of Lithuania]] having been a "[[federal]] part of the [[Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth]]" — that Lithuania retained its national identity and was not merely part of a homogenized [[superstate]]. I fear, though, that many readers will be confused by the expression "federal," since in countries like the [[United States]] and [[Germany]] "federal" merely contrasts with "[[U.S. state|state]]" or "''[[States of Germany|land]]''."

Perhaps a better way can be found of expressing your thought. [[User:Nihil novi|Nihil novi]] 19:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
:Yes, actually I ''had'' been thinking of "confederated." This expression, while perhaps not entirely unambiguous, would, I think, convey your thought better. [[User:Nihil novi|Nihil novi]] 19:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see [[Talk:Polish-Lithuanian_Commonwealth#Federation_or_confederation.3F]]. Bottom line is neither modern definitions of federation or confederation apply to well.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|&nbsp;Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&nbsp;]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;">&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</font>]]</span></sub> 18:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:04, 11 November 2007

The article Baltic languages are under attack

Baltic languages