Talk:Preuss School: Difference between revisions
Nominated article for GA |
OhanaUnited (talk | contribs) GA review |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Are you a Preuss School student? == |
== Are you a Preuss School student? == |
||
Welcome! If you are a Preuss School student, your contributions to this article are needed! Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal home page. More information can be found at [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome, newcomers]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]. Thanks! [[User:Rewster|Rewster]] 02:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC) |
Welcome! If you are a Preuss School student, your contributions to this article are needed! Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal home page. More information can be found at [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome, newcomers]] and [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]]. Thanks! [[User:Rewster|Rewster]] 02:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC) |
||
== GA review == |
|||
1. Well Written {{tick}} |
|||
2. Factually accurate {{tick}} |
|||
3. Broad in its coverage {{tick}} |
|||
4. Neutral point of view {{tick}} |
|||
5. Stability {{tick}} |
|||
Some persistent vandalism occured around 1 month ago, but this shouldn't be a problem. |
|||
6. Images {{tick}} |
|||
GA review passes. [[User:OhanaUnited|<span style="background-color:#DDDDFF; font-weight:bold"><font color="#0000FF">OhanaUnited</font></span>]] 14:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:04, 1 June 2007
Preuss School is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at 2007-05-12 Please use the This article is not categorized by subtopic. Please edit the |
California Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
nice comment Rewster Victuallers 14:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Are you a Preuss School student?
Welcome! If you are a Preuss School student, your contributions to this article are needed! Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a personal home page. More information can be found at Welcome, newcomers and What Wikipedia is not. Thanks! Rewster 02:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
GA review
1. Well Written
2. Factually accurate
3. Broad in its coverage
4. Neutral point of view
5. Stability Some persistent vandalism occured around 1 month ago, but this shouldn't be a problem.
6. Images
GA review passes. OhanaUnited 14:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)