User talk:Eleganceful: Difference between revisions
Notice: Conflict of interest. |
General note: G11. |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1734859594) < 13150000 | [[Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices|{{PAGENAME}}]] | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 09:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1734859594) < 13150000 | [[Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices|{{PAGENAME}}]] | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> [[User:Spiderone|<span style="color: #996600">Spiderone</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Spiderone|<span style="color:brown">(Talk to Spider)</span>]]</sup> 09:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
||
== December 2024 == |
|||
<br /> |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="background:#F5FFFC; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> |
|||
Hello, Eleganceful. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest<b> [[free content]] </b>encyclopedia. A page you created [[:Draft:Eleganceful]] has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G11|section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. |
|||
This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from [[WP:RS|reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject]]."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably [[WP:RS|reliable]] sources that are entirely [[WP:INDEPENDENT |independent]] of the [subject] and that devote [[WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. [[WP:REFBEGIN|Referencing for beginners]] explains how. Now, [[WP:NPOV|neutrally summarize]] what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at [[WP:YFA|Your first article]]."<small> --[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ATeahouse&diff=1231575206&oldid=1231551736 per Cullen328]</small>" [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for advertising|Advertising]] and using Wikipedia as a "[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a soapbox|soapbox]]" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. |
|||
Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located '''[[Wikipedia:Identifying blatant advertising#Typical signs of blatant advertising|here]]''' and '''[[User:Deepfriedokra/promo|here]]''', however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a [[WP:PAID|paid editor]] or has some other [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]]. Please review these policies, including the [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations|FAQ page on organizations]] to determine if this applies to you. |
|||
Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn. |
|||
Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. [[WP:G11|It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.]] and [[WP:RESUME|CV/resumé]]'s are by their nature promotional. |
|||
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet [[WP:N|notability guidelines]] with [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] that are [[WP:IS|unconnected with the subject]] and providing [[WP:V|verifiable information]]. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see [[ Wikipedia:Citing sources|this page on citing sources]] and [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)]]. [[Template:cite|This page]] has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template <nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki> at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the [[WP:WIZ|Article Wizard]] can help you. The [[WP:TWA|new user tutorial]] can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk]] and on [https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#wikipedia-en-help IRC chat] [[Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure]] is a useful tutorial. |
|||
New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. [[Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask]] contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. |
|||
<b>This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation. </b> |
|||
[[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 09:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- User:Deepfriedokra/g11 --> |
|||
</div> [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 09:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:27, 22 December 2024
Welcome!
Hi Eleganceful! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Eleganceful
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Eleganceful, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Eleganceful. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:26, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
Hello, Eleganceful. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created Draft:Eleganceful has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.
This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably reliable sources that are entirely independent of the [subject] and that devote significant coverage to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. Referencing for beginners explains how. Now, neutrally summarize what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at Your first article." --per Cullen328" Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted.
Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.
Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.
Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.
New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.
This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)