Wikipedia talk:Content assessment: Difference between revisions
Robynfeather (talk | contribs) |
Protegmatic (talk | contribs) →beged-kefet rating?: Reply |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
The article on the Hebrew concept of [[Begadkefat]] seems to fulfil everything required of a B-Class article, except that it's quite short. It seems to be comprehensive within the topic, but I'm not sure if I can put it as B-Class yet. Thoughts? [[User:Robynfeather|Robynfeather]] ([[User talk:Robynfeather|talk]]) 17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
The article on the Hebrew concept of [[Begadkefat]] seems to fulfil everything required of a B-Class article, except that it's quite short. It seems to be comprehensive within the topic, but I'm not sure if I can put it as B-Class yet. Thoughts? [[User:Robynfeather|Robynfeather]] ([[User talk:Robynfeather|talk]]) 17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:That article needs more references in my opinion [[User:Protegmatic|Protegmatic]] ([[User talk:Protegmatic|talk]]) 13:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:00, 13 July 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Content assessment page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Sugarhill Ddot -2024
Pls can someone help in assessing the article Sugarhill Ddot? Thank You. 2RDD (talk) 13:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Stub 48JCL (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you 158.62.88.23 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
B-class when citations are wrong?
Visa Requirements for US citizens has a B rating, but I keep finding citations completely irrelevant to the detail they claim to be supporting. 伟思礼 (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @伟思礼: There is no such article. In any case, if you feel that an article's rating is inconsistent with its content, you should bring that matter up at the talk page of the article itself. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 09:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Redrose64 Visa requirements for United States citizens 48JCL (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think that was what the dude above was trying to say. 48JCL (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Chemical structure is incorrect.
In the chemotherapy article there is an incorrect structure for the reaction of a nitrogen mustard compound with guanine. The correct structure is available at A. Polavarpu, et al., "The Mechanism of Guanine Alkylation by Nitrogen Mustards: A Computational Study," Journal of Organic Chemistry, 77 (14), 5914-5921, 2012. 66.111.123.176 (talk) 22:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Your comment is off-topic for this page, which is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Wikipedia:Content assessment. Please express your concerns at the talk page for the specific article concerned. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Redirects with unneeded importance parameters
A redirect page needn't have an importance parameter, but many do. For example, User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/Project/New Zealand has 2,190 such redirects. Is there an automated tool that can remove importance parameters from all redirect pages for an individual project? Or is there another way to tidy this up, say by programmatically collating them in the NA column without the work of removing the importance parameter? Thanks. Nurg (talk) 08:50, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Yes we could automatically rate these as NA and ignore the specified importance (as long as there was consensus for this). Then there would be no need to remove them all — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
beged-kefet rating?
The article on the Hebrew concept of Begadkefat seems to fulfil everything required of a B-Class article, except that it's quite short. It seems to be comprehensive within the topic, but I'm not sure if I can put it as B-Class yet. Thoughts? Robynfeather (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- That article needs more references in my opinion Protegmatic (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC)