Jump to content

Talk:Fu Wuji/GA1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
reserve review
 
+
Line 6: Line 6:


<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->

{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
|-
! height=50 | [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|GA]] review<br>{{small|(see [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|here]] for what the criteria are, and [[WP:GACN|here]] for what they are not)}}
|-
|
#It is '''reasonably well written'''.
#:a ''(prose, spelling, and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|}}<br/> b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|word choice]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Embedded list|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]''', as shown by a [[WP:GAN/I#R3|source spot-check]].
#:a ''(references)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(citations to [[WP:RS|reliable sources]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>c ''([[Wikipedia:No original research|OR]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>d ''([[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyvio]] and [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
#It is '''broad in its coverage'''.
#:a ''(major aspects)'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(focused)'': {{GAList/check|}}
#It follows the '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] policy'''.
#:''Fair representation without bias'': {{GAList/check|}}
#It is '''stable'''.
#:''No edit wars, etc.'': {{GAList/check|}}
#It is illustrated by '''[[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''', where possible and appropriate.
#:a ''(images are tagged and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Non-free_use_rationale_guideline|fair use rationales]])'': {{GAList/check|}} <br/>b ''(appropriate use with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]])'': {{GAList/check|}}
|-
| style="text-align:center;" |
'''Overall''':<br/>
''Pass/Fail'': {{GAList/check|}}<!-- Template:GAReview -->
|-
|-
! height=30|[[File:Symbol_support_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_wait.svg|15px]] · [[File:Symbol_neutral_vote.svg|15px]]
|-
|}

Revision as of 15:33, 3 July 2024

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 15:32, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·