Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xuanchuan: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:47, 27 April 2024

Xuanchuan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see the need for this article to stand alone, the current article could well be merged back into propaganda in China in several parts, some of which could be split out and put into Wiktionary. So I think it would be better to merge into Propaganda in China#Terminology. ときさきくるみ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 01:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Social science and China. ときさきくるみ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 01:54, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Especially if you are the one to do the merger - you are a good and careful editor. JArthur1984 (talk) 17:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose owing to unnecessary wordiness. Merging Propaganda in China (7726 words) and Xuanchuan (1560 words) would result in 9286 words, which exceeds the Article size guidelines. Keahapana (talk) 20:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keahapana: This is not a major problem, and given that a lot of the content is in fact duplicated and a significant portion of the xuanchuan content is unsourced, it is entirely possible to trim it down to meet the standard. ときさきくるみ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 05:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Propaganda in China#Terminology per Tokisaki Kurumi. This is just the Chinese word for "propaganda", and the sources listed are all discussion of propaganda in China rather than the word specifically. We are well served by a breif discussion at Propaganda in China#Terminology and mentions in other relevant articles. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :::@[[User:Keahapana|Keahapana]]: This is not a major problem, and given that a lot of the content is in fact duplicated and a significant portion of the ''xuanchuan'' content is unsourced, it is entirely possible to trim it down to meet the standard. [[User talk:Tokisaki Kurumi|<span style="color:#D6585C">ときさき</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Tokisaki Kurumi|<span style="color:#FFD710">くるみ</span>]]<sup> ''[[w:Moon hoax|not because they are easy]], [[w:Apollo 1#Fire|but because they are hard]]''</sup> 05:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 :<p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Explicit|<span style="color:#000000">✗</span>]][[User talk:Explicit|<span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span>]] 04:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:XfD relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Xuanchuan]]</noinclude></p>
+*'''Merge''' to [[Propaganda in China#Terminology]] per Tokisaki Kurumi.  This is just the Chinese word for "propaganda", and the sources listed are all discussion of propaganda in China rather than the word specifically.  We are well served by a breif discussion at [[Propaganda in China#Terminology]] and mentions in other relevant articles.  [[User:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] ([[User talk:Eluchil404|talk]]) 23:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)