Talk:Unicorn Overlord: Difference between revisions
ProtoDrake (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:ProtoDrake|ProtoDrake]] ([[User talk:ProtoDrake|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Video games|status=|note=|shortdesc=2024 video game}} |
{{GA nominee|17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:ProtoDrake|ProtoDrake]] ([[User talk:ProtoDrake|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Video games|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=2024 video game}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
||
{{WikiProject Video games |class=C|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Video games |class=C|importance=Low}} |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|1=https://www.gamerbraves.com/exclusive-unicorn-overlord-producer-calls-the-game-a-spiritual-successor-to-dragons-crown-in-a-way-it-was-originally-intended-for-ps-vita/ |
|1=https://www.gamerbraves.com/exclusive-unicorn-overlord-producer-calls-the-game-a-spiritual-successor-to-dragons-crown-in-a-way-it-was-originally-intended-for-ps-vita/ |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Talk:Unicorn Overlord/GA1}} |
|||
Revision as of 13:22, 26 April 2024
 | Unicorn Overlord is currently a Video games good article nominee. Nominated by ProtoDrake (talk) at 17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: 2024 video game |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Unicorn Overlord/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
@ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) Sorry for the wait, here's the review.
Six GA Criteria
1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.
Lead
-Looks good
Gameplay
-"The arrangement of character parties on a grid influencing their abilities and combat efficiency." Could you elaborate on the wording on this?
- Rewrote to be clearer.
Synopsis
-Looks good
Development
-What are the angels? They aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article.
- Put in a bit of exploration/explanation in the story section, so hopefully
Release
-Looks good
Reception
-"When mentioned, the voice acting and music also met with general praise" Needs a typo fix but I'd also axe the "when mentioned."
- Done.
Overall
-Looking pretty good. Just patch up the few things above and this is good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Pokelego999: I hope I've addressed everything above suitably. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Looks good. Happy to pass. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)