Jump to content

Stalin: Passage to Revolution: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reviews: wikilink
Filled in 1 bare reference(s) with reFill 2
Line 22: Line 22:
Kees Boterbloem's review acknowledged Suny's extensive knowledge but criticized what the reviewer saw as the book's excessive length, occasional tangents, unclear editing, and lack of a separate bibliography. Boterbloem appreciated Suny's insights into Stalin's early life and rise to power but felts that the book could have been more tightly edited for clarity and focus.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Boterbloem |first=Kees |date=2020-10-01 |title=Stalin: passage to revolution: by Ronald Grigor Suny, Princeton, NJ, Princeton UP, 2020, xix, 859 pp., $39.95 (hardback), ISBN: 9780691182032 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00182370.2020.1889246 |journal=The Historian |language=en |volume=82 |issue=4 |pages=523–527 |doi=10.1080/00182370.2020.1889246 |issn=0018-2370}}</ref>
Kees Boterbloem's review acknowledged Suny's extensive knowledge but criticized what the reviewer saw as the book's excessive length, occasional tangents, unclear editing, and lack of a separate bibliography. Boterbloem appreciated Suny's insights into Stalin's early life and rise to power but felts that the book could have been more tightly edited for clarity and focus.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Boterbloem |first=Kees |date=2020-10-01 |title=Stalin: passage to revolution: by Ronald Grigor Suny, Princeton, NJ, Princeton UP, 2020, xix, 859 pp., $39.95 (hardback), ISBN: 9780691182032 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00182370.2020.1889246 |journal=The Historian |language=en |volume=82 |issue=4 |pages=523–527 |doi=10.1080/00182370.2020.1889246 |issn=0018-2370}}</ref>


Chris Beausang's review praised Suny's meticulous examination of Stalin's formative years, particularly his involvement in the regional sections of the Russian Social Democratic and Labour Party and his intellectual development. Beausang appreciated Suny's avoidance of simplistic explanations, such as psychologistic approaches, and his thorough analysis of Marxist ideology and its influence on Stalin's early activism. Beausang went on to highlight Suny's clear depiction of the distinct characteristics of industrial centers like Tiflis, Baku, and Batumi, as well as his elucidation of the Bolshevik position on the national question and Stalin's role in shaping it. Beausang expressed confidence in Suny's ability to delve into other aspects of Stalin's life and hopes for future projects despite potential challenges in accessing primary documents.<ref>https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/20837_stalin-passage-to-revolution-by-ronald-grigot-suny-reviewed-by-chris-beausang/</ref>
Chris Beausang's review praised Suny's meticulous examination of Stalin's formative years, particularly his involvement in the regional sections of the Russian Social Democratic and Labour Party and his intellectual development. Beausang appreciated Suny's avoidance of simplistic explanations, such as psychologistic approaches, and his thorough analysis of Marxist ideology and its influence on Stalin's early activism. Beausang went on to highlight Suny's clear depiction of the distinct characteristics of industrial centers like Tiflis, Baku, and Batumi, as well as his elucidation of the Bolshevik position on the national question and Stalin's role in shaping it. Beausang expressed confidence in Suny's ability to delve into other aspects of Stalin's life and hopes for future projects despite potential challenges in accessing primary documents.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/20837_stalin-passage-to-revolution-by-ronald-grigot-suny-reviewed-by-chris-beausang/|title=‘Stalin: Passage to Revolution’ by Ronald Grigot Suny reviewed by Chris Beausang – Marx & Philosophy Society}}</ref>


In his review of the book for the [[The Washington Post|Washington Post]], [[Robert Service (historian)|Robert Service]] lauded Suny's detailed research and deep understanding of Georgian history and the early years of Stalin's life. Service praised Suny for challenging conventional narratives about Stalin's intelligence and political acumen, presenting him as a dedicated Marxist intellectual and leader. However, Service critiqued the book's conclusion for offering a somewhat tired analysis of Stalin in 1917 and for failing to fully explore the political partnership between Lenin and Stalin. Service also expressed disappointment in the book's inability to fully explain why Stalin, after his rise to power, unleashed [[Great Purge|the Great Terror]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-10-30 |title=Review {{!}} Did Stalin’s rise to power foretell the butchery that came next? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/did-stalins-rise-to-power-foretell-the-butchery-that-came-next/2020/10/29/57c7cf16-1233-11eb-ad6f-36c93e6e94fb_story.html |work=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref>
In his review of the book for the [[The Washington Post|Washington Post]], [[Robert Service (historian)|Robert Service]] lauded Suny's detailed research and deep understanding of Georgian history and the early years of Stalin's life. Service praised Suny for challenging conventional narratives about Stalin's intelligence and political acumen, presenting him as a dedicated Marxist intellectual and leader. However, Service critiqued the book's conclusion for offering a somewhat tired analysis of Stalin in 1917 and for failing to fully explore the political partnership between Lenin and Stalin. Service also expressed disappointment in the book's inability to fully explain why Stalin, after his rise to power, unleashed [[Great Purge|the Great Terror]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2020-10-30 |title=Review {{!}} Did Stalin’s rise to power foretell the butchery that came next? |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/did-stalins-rise-to-power-foretell-the-butchery-that-came-next/2020/10/29/57c7cf16-1233-11eb-ad6f-36c93e6e94fb_story.html |work=Washington Post |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref>

Revision as of 23:43, 19 March 2024

Stalin: Passage to Revolution
Cover
AuthorRonald Grigor Suny
LanguageEnglish
SubjectJoseph Stalin
GenreNonfiction
PublisherStanford University Press
Publication date
October 6, 2020
Pages896
AwardsDeutscher Memorial Prize (2021)
ISBN9780691182032

Stalin: Passage to Revolution is a 2020 new autobiography of Joseph Stalin by American historian, political scientist and academic Ronald Grigor Suny.[1]

Summary

The biography delves into Joseph Stalin's formative years, exploring his transformation from a poverty-stricken, idealistic youth to a cunning and formidable figure in Russian history. Suny examines Stalin's early life in the Caucasus, tracing his evolution from a Georgian nationalist to a ruthless political operative within the Bolshevik movement. Drawing on new archival evidence, Suny portrays Stalin's journey through turbulent times, from his involvement in underground activism to his ascent within Bolshevik ranks. The book highlights Stalin's ideological shifts, his engagement in debates of his era, and his abandonment of religious faith in pursuit of power.[1]

Reviews

Barbara C. Allen praised the book for its meticulous exploration of Stalin's ideological formation. She commended Suny for his in-depth analysis of Stalin's strengths and weaknesses as a Marxist organizer, agitator, and politician, particularly emphasizing his insightful coverage of Stalin's relationships and his adept weaving of personal and political dynamics. Allen appreciated Suny's attention to detail in recreating historical contexts, such as Stalin's time in Baku and Saint Petersburg, highlighting the book's thoroughness in portraying the shaping influences on Stalin's political persona.[2]

Kees Boterbloem's review acknowledged Suny's extensive knowledge but criticized what the reviewer saw as the book's excessive length, occasional tangents, unclear editing, and lack of a separate bibliography. Boterbloem appreciated Suny's insights into Stalin's early life and rise to power but felts that the book could have been more tightly edited for clarity and focus.[3]

Chris Beausang's review praised Suny's meticulous examination of Stalin's formative years, particularly his involvement in the regional sections of the Russian Social Democratic and Labour Party and his intellectual development. Beausang appreciated Suny's avoidance of simplistic explanations, such as psychologistic approaches, and his thorough analysis of Marxist ideology and its influence on Stalin's early activism. Beausang went on to highlight Suny's clear depiction of the distinct characteristics of industrial centers like Tiflis, Baku, and Batumi, as well as his elucidation of the Bolshevik position on the national question and Stalin's role in shaping it. Beausang expressed confidence in Suny's ability to delve into other aspects of Stalin's life and hopes for future projects despite potential challenges in accessing primary documents.[4]

In his review of the book for the Washington Post, Robert Service lauded Suny's detailed research and deep understanding of Georgian history and the early years of Stalin's life. Service praised Suny for challenging conventional narratives about Stalin's intelligence and political acumen, presenting him as a dedicated Marxist intellectual and leader. However, Service critiqued the book's conclusion for offering a somewhat tired analysis of Stalin in 1917 and for failing to fully explore the political partnership between Lenin and Stalin. Service also expressed disappointment in the book's inability to fully explain why Stalin, after his rise to power, unleashed the Great Terror.[5]

References