Jump to content

User talk:DutchHistoryNerdWW2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
unblock: ReplyThat's not adequate as it opens the door for you to WP:close paraphrase and think it's OK.. Please do better
unblock: Reply
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
Line 470: Line 470:


:That's not adequate as it opens the door for you to [[WP:close paraphrase]] and think it's OK. Please do better. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 09:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
:That's not adequate as it opens the door for you to [[WP:close paraphrase]] and think it's OK. Please do better. [[User:Deepfriedokra|-- Deepfriedokra]] ([[User talk:Deepfriedokra|talk]]) 09:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
::i Will do better trust, i used to edit existing pages i did try to write in my own words its ofcourse hard. i promise u ill try with my texts and not copied from a website. [[User:DutchHistoryNerdWW2|BasedWihelm]] ([[User talk:DutchHistoryNerdWW2#top|talk]]) 13:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:42, 11 March 2024

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tilburg (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tilburg (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Tilburg (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiger tank 222 (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tiger tank 222 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tiger1.info/event-page/222-abandoned. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Ferien (talk) 21:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Konstantin Sakharov (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mikhail Hanzhin moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mikhail Hanzhin. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and to support the article contents better. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikhail Hanzhin (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:14, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hi, I've just declined a number of your drafts, all for the same reason – lack of referencing. Please note that everything you write must be supported by citations to reliable published sources; in fact, when you're writing an article, you should only ever summarise (in your own words) what such sources have said, and by citing the sources you are telling us which source said what. Please see WP:REFB for more advice. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to your edit to the Battle of Mons article where you changed the result in the infobox based only on your personal views, and the Battle of the Mons pocket article where you added a totally irrelevant self-created photo. Please stop this unconstructive style of editing, or you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Nick-D (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Block is for adding an image to the Battle of Zeeland article that you'd added to Commons under an obviously false claim that you were the copyright owner, as well as the problematic editing noted above. Nick-D (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Breda

Hi. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is for you to add the tag to indicate the page is still under construction (if it is). This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Breda moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Breda. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and Nowhere near enough references. Huge sections of unreferenced information. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 17:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pixelplanet.fun (April 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Breda (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Twinkle1990 (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Battle of Breda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.waroverholland.nl/index.php?page=part-i-the-south (34.6%) and http://www.waroverholland.nl/index.php?page=west-brabant (27.0%). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Twinkle1990 (talk) 09:51, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle Of Tilburg

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle Of Tilburg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Den Bosch

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Den Bosch, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Konstantin Sakharov

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Konstantin Sakharov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mikhail Hanzhin

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mikhail Hanzhin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tilburg in the second world war, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dutch Tanks and Armoured Cars during WW2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pixelplanet.fun

Information icon Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pixelplanet.fun, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle Of Tilburg

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle Of Tilburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Tilburg

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Tilburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Den Bosch

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Den Bosch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Incident of Shusha (2023) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://english.alarabiya.net/News/world/2023/09/19/Six-killed-in-Karabakh-mine-blasts-Azerbaijan-says. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikishovel (talk) 20:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Konstantin Sakharov

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Konstantin Sakharov".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:19, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mikhail Hanzhin

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mikhail Hanzhin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tilburg in the second world war".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pixelplanet.fun

Hello, DutchHistoryNerdWW2. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pixelplanet.fun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dutch Occupation Of London moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dutch Occupation Of London. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 12:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dutch Occupation Of London (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. KylieTastic (talk) 13:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dutch occupation of London has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dutch occupation of London. Thanks! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ruud Buitelaar were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 03:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uprising of Brussels (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missing bibliography on Ten Crucial Days Campaign

Hi, you recently moved Ten Crucial Days Campaign out of draft space and the article has inline citations to works that aren't listed in any bibliography and don't allow the text to be verified, contrary to WP:V. Would you be able to add those works to the newly created subsection in the references section to bring the article up to mainspace standard? Thanks, microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:20, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed some citations that I believe to be correct based on last name and year, taken from American Revolutionary War and George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River. Can you confirm these are correct? microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ten Crucial Days Campaign, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sullivan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Battle of Baarle Nassau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.polishwargraves.nl/lom/bana.htm and https://www.liberationroute.com/pois/666/the-28-days-of-baarle. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 00:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI notice - Persistent addition of copyrighted content, continued disruptive editing following previous block

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 00:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Incident of Larache (1776) (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ruud Buitelaar were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Incident of Larache (1776) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Incident of Larache (1776). Thanks! Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 02:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

DutchHistoryNerdWW2 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i understand why i was blocked ill try to make pages with my own words and not copied straight from the website. i also will try to see if any image on the internet has free to use or 0 copyright, thank you.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i understand why i was blocked ill try to make pages with my own words and not copied straight from the website. i also will try to see if any image on the internet has free to use or 0 copyright, thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i understand why i was blocked ill try to make pages with my own words and not copied straight from the website. i also will try to see if any image on the internet has free to use or 0 copyright, thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i understand why i was blocked ill try to make pages with my own words and not copied straight from the website. i also will try to see if any image on the internet has free to use or 0 copyright, thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

BasedWihelm (talk) 07:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not adequate as it opens the door for you to WP:close paraphrase and think it's OK. Please do better. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i Will do better trust, i used to edit existing pages i did try to write in my own words its ofcourse hard. i promise u ill try with my texts and not copied from a website. BasedWihelm (talk) 13:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]