Jump to content

User talk:Contino: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs)
m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:


(R) is unneeded. Please don't place it again. '''[[User:Grsz11|<span style="color:black;">Grsz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Grsz11|<b><span style="color:red;">11</span></b>]]</sup>''' 00:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
(R) is unneeded. Please don't place it again. '''[[User:Grsz11|<span style="color:black;">Grsz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Grsz11|<b><span style="color:red;">11</span></b>]]</sup>''' 00:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

== Proposed Deletion ==
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Ron Mamiya]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Ron Mamiya]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Ron Mamiya|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:AnthroMimus|AnthroMimus]] ([[User talk:AnthroMimus|talk]]) 16:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:18, 26 May 2023

Talkback

Hello, Contino. You have new messages at Smallman12q's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Smallman12q (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

test

resolved
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

This is a test. Testing...

Learned this kind of box at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Barack_Obama#Need_to_define_what_is_included_in_article_.28Proposal_of_30_March_2009.29

I was just restating in layman's terms Wikipedia policy, that important points should be included and certainly have higher priority than trivial details (which, if too trivial have so low priority that they are not included in an article).

This met with fantastic opposition...but what were they opposing? Grsz11 even went on record as "Oppose" and Tvoz was very much against the discussion.

I hope it was not being argumentative just for argument's sake (which is disruptive). I hope it was not opposition against basic Wikipedia principles.

If they didn't want to participate in the discussion, they could have kept silent. There are countless other discussions in Wikipedia that most people choose not to participate in.

Anyway, Grsz11 has marked the issue as resolved and has taught me how to make a box in the process.


Goldfish

(R) is unneeded. Please don't place it again. Grsz11 00:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion

==  Proposed deletion of Ron Mamiya ==
Notice

The article Ron Mamiya has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AnthroMimus (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]