User talk:Pulpfiction621

My favourite things to do on the Encyclopedia are to add portals to pages and other WikiGnome antics to assist in facilitating sending people down the Wiki-wormhole. I also enjoy reverting vandalism, adding to pages, and other acts that slowly add and improve to the wealth of knowledge on Wikipedia! On my recent contributions to Great Chinese Famine Hello, I would like to start a discussion with you about my recent edition on the page of Great Chinese Famine. More specifically on the description of this item. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine#/media/File:People's_commune_canteen.jpg I have read the characters on the walls in this photo and the phrase "Eat free, work hard." it was originally captioned with does not reflect what it was meant by the characters on the wall. A more accurate translation would be to mean that the workers(farmers) works for free by only eating basic food and take no personal gain, and that they should focus on farming(work). This is from my knowledge of Chinese (which is my mother tongue). I do not know what reference the original editor had when he/she wrote the caption, but it is not reflective of what is written on the wall. Please let me know of your opinions. Rocky Darockymn (talk) 15:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Those are fantastic points. I will self revert. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 15:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Pulpfiction621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I noticed my account was randomly banned for “sockpuppetry” with “Th78Blue”. I looked at my edit history to see where this user and I have interacted recently and it’s only been to unrevert some edits of mine that had been previously reverted. Otherwise, I haven’t interacted with him/her/them that much at all. This is just so surprising given how much hard work and effort I have put into the Encyclopedia (nearly 10,000 edits) all for it to be undone because somebody believes that me and some other person are working in cahoots, despite the fact that all I’ve been able to find suggests he/she/them basically agreed with SOME of my edits a few times in the past and vice versa.

When I revert vandalism from random people whose only goal is to write “pee pee or poo poo” jokes on serious pages, I still give them due process of four warnings before reporting them to the admin. Yet, despite my hard work and countless hours of free labor contributing to Wikipedia, I am greeted today with an indefinite ban because another user liked my edits. I am incredibly disappointed, and expected more from a community that I respect so highly.

That being said, I would still like my account to be reinstated given the countless hours I have put into it and the fact that I still deeply believe in Wikipedia’s mission. When I’m reinstated, I will prominently place a warning on my userpage cautioning other users from interacting with me, unless they wish to risk claims of “sockpuppetry” or “meat puppetry”, or some other term that I end up learning as I continue to work on Wikipedia. My only goal now is to focus on my work improving the encyclopedia and I don’t want random users preventing me from doing that. Thank you. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I noticed my account was randomly banned for “sockpuppetry” with “Th78Blue”. I looked at my edit history to see where this user and I have interacted recently and it’s only been to unrevert some edits of mine that had been previously reverted. Otherwise, I haven’t interacted with him/her/them that much at all. This is just so surprising given how much hard work and effort I have put into the Encyclopedia (nearly 10,000 edits) all for it to be undone because somebody believes that me and some other person are working in cahoots, despite the fact that all I’ve been able to find suggests he/she/them basically agreed with SOME of my edits a few times in the past and vice versa. :When I revert vandalism from random people whose only goal is to write “pee pee or poo poo” jokes on serious pages, I still give them due process of four warnings before reporting them to the admin. Yet, despite my hard work and countless hours of free labor contributing to Wikipedia, I am greeted today with an indefinite ban because another user liked my edits. I am incredibly disappointed, and expected more from a community that I respect so highly. :That being said, I would still like my account to be reinstated given the countless hours I have put into it and the fact that I still deeply believe in Wikipedia’s mission. When I’m reinstated, I will prominently place a warning on my userpage cautioning other users from interacting with me, unless they wish to risk claims of “sockpuppetry” or “meat puppetry”, or some other term that I end up learning as I continue to work on Wikipedia. My only goal now is to focus on my work improving the encyclopedia and I don’t want random users preventing me from doing that. Thank you. [[User:Pulpfiction621|Pulpfiction621]] ([[User talk:Pulpfiction621#top|talk]]) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I noticed my account was randomly banned for “sockpuppetry” with “Th78Blue”. I looked at my edit history to see where this user and I have interacted recently and it’s only been to unrevert some edits of mine that had been previously reverted. Otherwise, I haven’t interacted with him/her/them that much at all. This is just so surprising given how much hard work and effort I have put into the Encyclopedia (nearly 10,000 edits) all for it to be undone because somebody believes that me and some other person are working in cahoots, despite the fact that all I’ve been able to find suggests he/she/them basically agreed with SOME of my edits a few times in the past and vice versa. :When I revert vandalism from random people whose only goal is to write “pee pee or poo poo” jokes on serious pages, I still give them due process of four warnings before reporting them to the admin. Yet, despite my hard work and countless hours of free labor contributing to Wikipedia, I am greeted today with an indefinite ban because another user liked my edits. I am incredibly disappointed, and expected more from a community that I respect so highly. :That being said, I would still like my account to be reinstated given the countless hours I have put into it and the fact that I still deeply believe in Wikipedia’s mission. When I’m reinstated, I will prominently place a warning on my userpage cautioning other users from interacting with me, unless they wish to risk claims of “sockpuppetry” or “meat puppetry”, or some other term that I end up learning as I continue to work on Wikipedia. My only goal now is to focus on my work improving the encyclopedia and I don’t want random users preventing me from doing that. Thank you. [[User:Pulpfiction621|Pulpfiction621]] ([[User talk:Pulpfiction621#top|talk]]) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I noticed my account was randomly banned for “sockpuppetry” with “Th78Blue”. I looked at my edit history to see where this user and I have interacted recently and it’s only been to unrevert some edits of mine that had been previously reverted. Otherwise, I haven’t interacted with him/her/them that much at all. This is just so surprising given how much hard work and effort I have put into the Encyclopedia (nearly 10,000 edits) all for it to be undone because somebody believes that me and some other person are working in cahoots, despite the fact that all I’ve been able to find suggests he/she/them basically agreed with SOME of my edits a few times in the past and vice versa. :When I revert vandalism from random people whose only goal is to write “pee pee or poo poo” jokes on serious pages, I still give them due process of four warnings before reporting them to the admin. Yet, despite my hard work and countless hours of free labor contributing to Wikipedia, I am greeted today with an indefinite ban because another user liked my edits. I am incredibly disappointed, and expected more from a community that I respect so highly. :That being said, I would still like my account to be reinstated given the countless hours I have put into it and the fact that I still deeply believe in Wikipedia’s mission. When I’m reinstated, I will prominently place a warning on my userpage cautioning other users from interacting with me, unless they wish to risk claims of “sockpuppetry” or “meat puppetry”, or some other term that I end up learning as I continue to work on Wikipedia. My only goal now is to focus on my work improving the encyclopedia and I don’t want random users preventing me from doing that. Thank you. [[User:Pulpfiction621|Pulpfiction621]] ([[User talk:Pulpfiction621#top|talk]]) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Pulpfiction621 (talk) 23:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)